| Literature DB >> 29216201 |
Till F Kaireit1,2, Sajoscha A Sorrentino1, Julius Renne1,2, Christian Schoenfeld1,2, Andreas Voskrebenzev1,2, Marcel Gutberlet1,2, Angela Schulz3, Peter M Jakob4, Gesine Hansen2,3, Frank Wacker1,2, Tobias Welte2,5, Burkhard Tümmler2,3, Jens Vogel-Claussen1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To test quantitative functional lung MRI techniques in young adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) compared to healthy volunteers and to monitor immediate treatment effects of a single inhalation of hypertonic saline in comparison to clinical routine pulmonary function tests.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29216201 PMCID: PMC5720731 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187483
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Patient cohort (CONSORT flow chart).
Please note: For the control group a second visit of 4 patients of the treatment group were included resulting in 20 visits of 16 patients.
Fig 2Study protocol.
Pulmonary function testing (spirometry and multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBW)) were performed 60 to 90 minutes prior to the pre treatment scan / 1st scan. MRI was performed as follows: first, morphological images were assessed followed by phase contrast angiography (PCA) in the ascending aorta. Afterwards T1 mapping breathing room air and again after six minutes of 100% oxygen wash-in time was acquired. Regional Fractional Lung Ventilation MRI (FV) was then acquired under normoxic conditions. Then for assessment of pulmonary parenchymal perfusion, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI was carried out followed by a morphological sequence post i.v. contrast. Afterwards inhalation treatment with hypertonic saline (HTS, treatment group) or no treatment (control group) was performed and the PFT (30 minutes after treatment) and MRI (2 h after treatment) were repeated. Healthy volunteers underwent one scan using the same functional lung MRI protocol, except for DCE-MRI and phase-contrast MRI.
Subject demographics.
| Characteristic | CF treatment | CF control | Healthy volunteers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 14 | 6 | 12 | |
| No. of excluded participants | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| Reason for exclusion | Examination not completed | |||
| Sex | ||||
| No. of male subjects | 2 | 1 | 7 | |
| No. of female subjects | 8 | 5 | 5 | |
| Age (y) | 14.5 (12.75–16.75) | 14.5 (13.25–16.25) | 25.5 (22.25–35.25) | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 18.2 (16.7–20.0) | 17.8 (16.0–18.1) | 21.3 (20.0–26.0) | |
| FEV1 (% predicted) | 85.0 (63.5–96.5) | 79.0 (58.8–91.3) | ||
| LCI | 11.5 (10.4–14.3) | 11.3 (7.8–16.8) | ||
Unless otherwise indicated data are median with 25th and 75th percentiles in parenthesis; FEV1—forced expiratory volume in 1 second, LCI–lung clearance index.
Comparison of CF patients to healthy volunteers.
| Variable | CF (n = 12) | Healthy volunteers (n = 12) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac output (l/min) | 5.8 (5.2–6.5) | - | ||
| Median T1 room air (ms) | ||||
| whole lung | 1186 (1104–1215) | 1253 (1211–1281) | ||
| upper lobes | 1151 (1104–1151) | 1257 (1213–1282) | ||
| lower lobes | 1207 (1112–1238) | 1247 (1214–1283) | ||
| ratio UL/LL | 0.98 (0.92–1.01) | 1.00 (0.99–1.02) | 0.061 | |
| Median T1 oxygen (ms) | ||||
| whole lung | 1030 (1010–1077) | 1099 (1057–1119) | ||
| upper lobes | 1025 (1000–1070) | 1098 (1060–1126) | ||
| lower lobes | 1036 (1016–1080) | 1093 (1059–1120) | ||
| ratio UL/LL | 0.99 (0.95–1.00) | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | ||
| Delta T1 (ms) | ||||
| whole lung | 138.0 (94.0–161.0) | 149.0 (148.0–181.0) | 0.102 | |
| upper lobes | 125.0 (104.0–151.0) | 154.0 (143.5–173.3) | ||
| lower lobes | 154.0 (96.0–171.0) | 151.5 (142.5–179.3) | 0.255 | |
| ratio UL/LL | 0.94 (0.70–1.15) | 1.02 (0.89–1.08) | 0.689 | |
| QCD of T1 room air (ms) | ||||
| whole lung | 0.044 (0.036–0.059) | 0.029 (0.025–0.036) | ||
| upper lobes | 0.041 (0.032–0.054) | 0.029 (0.026–0.034) | ||
| lower lobes | 0.044 (0.036–0.058) | 0.028 (0.024–0.038) | ||
| ratio UL/LL | 0.93 (0.77–1.13) | 1.03 (0.88–1.11) | 0.442 | |
| QCD of T1 oxygen (ms) | ||||
| whole lung | 0.041 (0.036–0.047) | 0.033 (0.025–0.041) | ||
| upper lobes | 0.042 (0.035–0.045) | 0.028 (0.023–0.040) | ||
| lower lobes | 0.041 (0.034–0.053) | 0.037 (0.026–0.043) | 0.207 | |
| ratio UL/LL | 1.03 (0.82–1.08) | 0.89 (0.75–0.93) | 0.079 | |
| QCD of Delta T1 | ||||
| whole lung | 0.372 (0.308–0.504) | 0.277 (0.202–0.379) | 0.132 | |
| upper lobes | 0.369 (0.296–0.530) | 0.256 (0.187–0.365) | 0.091 | |
| lower lobes | 0.367 (0.289–0.506) | 0.306 (0.222–0.401) | 0.117 | |
| ratio UL/LL | 0.85 (0.77–1.58) | 0.90 (0.84–0.96) | 0.976 | |
| Median FV | ||||
| whole lung | 0.132 (0.105–0.191) | 0.181 (0.168–0.233) | ||
| upper lobes | 0.118 (0.074–0.181) | 0.178 (0.157–0.231) | ||
| lower lobes | 0.173 (0.127–0.184) | 0.193 (0.170–0.226) | 0.204 | |
| ratio UL/LL | 0.77 (0.43–1.14) | 0.97 (0.86–1.05) | ||
| QCD of FV | ||||
| whole lung | 0.476 (0.360–0.631) | 0.320 (0.289–0.355) | ||
| upper lobes | 0.507 (0.381–0.666) | 0.317 (0.292–0.352) | ||
| lower lobes | 0.398 (0.306–0.444) | 0.307 (0.257–0.372) | 0.078 | |
| ratio UL/LL | 1.26 (1.15–1.54) | 1.02 (0.86–1.20) | ||
Unless otherwise indicated data are median with 25th and 75th percentiles in parenthesis; UL—upper lobes, LL—lower lobes, QCD–quartile coefficient of dispersion. FV–fractional ventilation. P values calculated by a 2-sided Wilcoxon test.
Fig 3Comparison of a healthy volunteer and a CF patient.
First row: healthy volunteer, second row: pre treatment, third row: post treatment; A: room air T1 map, oxygen enhanced T1 map and delta T1 map; B: Calculated perfusion map by using a pixel-by-pixel deconvolution analysis; C: Fractional ventilation map. Regarding the healthy volunteer values are homogeneously distributed throughout the whole lungs. In comparison to that in the CF patient values are lower and more heterogeneous distributed. Hypoventilated and hypoperfused areas can be seen in all three methods, most prominent in the right upper lobe. After treatment an improvement of ventilation and perfusion is not observed.
Receiver operating characteristics analysis.
| Variable | Cut point | Specificity | Sensitivity | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median T1 room air (ms) | 1200 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.89 | |
| Median T1 room oxygen (ms) | 1053 | 0.92 | 0.73 | 0.87 | |
| Delta T1 (ms) | 138 | 0.92 | 0.55 | 0.71 | |
| QCD of Delta T1 | 0.481 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.69 | |
| QCD of T1 room air | 0.038 | 0.92 | 0.73 | 0.88 | |
| QCD of T1 oxygen | 0.039 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.77 | |
| Median FV | 0.169 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.82 | |
| QCD of FV | 0.351 | 0.75 | 0.91 | 0.89 | |
Cut points and area under the curve (AUC) were determined for balanced sensitivity and specificity. FV—fractional ventilation; QCD—quartile coefficient of dispersion.
Fig 4Receiver operator characteristic analysis (ROC).
Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis with clinical diagnosis as the criterion showed the ability of functional MRI to discriminate young adults with CF from healthy volunteers. A: Room air T1 (cut point: 1200 ms; area under the curve (AUC) 0.89); B: Quartile coefficient of dispersion of fractional ventilation (cut point 0.351; AUC 0.89).
Functional lung MRI of the CF patient cohort pre and post hypertonic saline treatment vs CF controls.
| HTS treatment (n = 10) | Control (n = 6) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Pre | Post | 1st scan | 2nd scan | ||||
| Cardiac Output (l/min) | 5.9 (5.0–6.7) | 6.0 (5.1–7.1) | 0.49 | 5.6 (5.2–6.6) | 5.2 (4.9–6.3) | 0.09 | ||
| Median PBF (ml/100 ml/min) | ||||||||
| whole lung | 77.3 (53.5–97.6) | 67.7 (55.3–101.9) | 0.49 | 88.2 (76.9–111.8) | 79.6 (53.6–108.2) | 0.22 | ||
| upper lobes | 56.4 (43.0–92.5) | 55.0 (44.9–98.6) | 81.7 (53.9–101.4) | 67.1 (44.0–101.2) | 0.44 | |||
| lower lobes | 99.3 (58.1–120.7) | 86.9 (63.8–123.8) | 107.0 (86.4–130.7) | 94.5 (77.4–116.7) | 0.22 | |||
| ratio (upper/lower) | 0.70 (0.54–0.87) | 0.69 (0.56–0.92) | 0.38 | 0.70 (0.52–0.98) | 0.78 (0.57–0.96) | 0.56 | ||
| Median PBF/cardiac output (ml/100 ml/min/l/min) | ||||||||
| whole lung | 12.60 (9.39–18.32) | 11.08 (8.39–19.23) | 0.63 | 15.61 (12.54–21.62) | 15.25 (8.81–19.71) | 0.84 | ||
| upper lobes | 9.95 (7.16–17.21) | 9.19 (6.68–18.61) | 1.00 | 14.87 (8.79–19.03) | 12.82 (8.30–18.34) | 1.00 | ||
| lower lobes | 15.37 (10.89–20.72) | 12.83 (9.92–22.72) | 0.70 | 18.06 (13.57–25.34) | 17.25 (11.05–22.69) | 0.84 | ||
| Median T1 room air (ms) | ||||||||
| whole lung | 1155 (1098–1202) | 1103 (1062–1161) | 1214 (1084–1231) | 1090 (949–1216) | ||||
| upper lobes | 1112 (1097–1192) | 1091 (1054–1129) | 1169 (1086–1225) | 1087 (938–1174) | 0.06 | |||
| lower lobes | 1197 (1103–1211) | 1125 (1168–1177) | 0.05 | 1226 (1081–1253) | 1091 (958–1223) | 0.06 | ||
| Median T1 oxygen (ms) | ||||||||
| whole lung | 1026 (1004–1064) | 993 (978–1023) | 1053 (1041–1096) | 995 (879–1066) | 0.13 | |||
| upper lobes | 1021 (997–1054) | 998 (963–1020) | 0.05 | 1032 (1029–1097) | 989 (876–1052) | 0.13 | ||
| lower lobes | 1036 (1015–1077) | 1024 (978–1031) | 1077 (1050–1094) | 1006 (883–1082) | 0.13 | |||
| Delta T1 (ms) | ||||||||
| whole lung | 130.0 (92.5–152.0) | 117.0 (87.0–145.5) | 0.29 | 161.0 (99.0–165.5) | 125.0 (72.0–150.5) | 0.13 | ||
| upper lobes | 117.0 (95.5–143.0) | 114.0 (87.0–121.5) | 0.23 | 125.0 (97.8–160.5) | 126.0 (87.5–140.0) | 0.31 | ||
| lower lobes | 135.0 (88.5–165.5) | 115.0 (83.0–147.0) | 0.57 | 154.0 (98.0–172.0) | 122.0 (50.0–155.5) | 0.13 | ||
| Median FV | ||||||||
| whole lung | 0.132 (0.099–0.180) | 0.129 (0.111–0.190) | 0.77 | 0.142 (0.128–0.166) | 0.157 (0.134–0.182) | 0.56 | ||
| upper lobes | 0.118 (0.066–0.164) | 0.117 (0.084–0.186) | 0.32 | 0.156 (0.138–0.176) | 0.69 | |||
| lower lobes | 0.177 (0.117–0.196) | 0.158 (0.141–0.201) | 0.63 | 0.157 (0.119–0.175) | 0.170 (0.132–0.192) | 0.44 | ||
| Global score (72 pts.) | 15 (5–25) | 17 (9–26) | 0.81 | 16 (7–30) | 16 (3–31) | 1.00 | ||
| Mean scores | ||||||||
| score of upper lobes (12 pts.) | 3.5 (1.0–5.3) | 3.0 (2.3–5.6) | 0.53 | 4.3 (2.1–6.0) | 3.3 (0.4–5.8) | 0.25 | ||
| score of lower lobes (12 pts.) | 1.5 (1.0–3.5) | 2.5 (1.9–3.9) | 0.19 | 2.3 (0.4–5.3) | 3.0 (1.1–5.5) | 0.50 | ||
| Pulmonary function tests | ||||||||
| FEV1 (%) | 85.0 (63.5–96.5) | 72.5 (54.3–90.8) | 0.06 | 79.0 (58.8–91.2) | - | |||
| LCI | 11.5 (10.4–14.3) | 12.2 (10.3–14.8) | 0.22 | 11.3 (7.8–16.8) | 11.7 (8.4–19.0) | 0.22 | ||
Unless otherwise indicated data are median with 25th and 75th percentiles in parenthesis
*: values are indicated as ml blood flow / 100 ml lung parenchyma / minute, adjusted for cardiac output: ml blood flow / 100 ml lung parenchyma / minute / l/min cardiac output respectively
†: (Left upper lobe + right upper lobe)/2 (each item 12 pts.)
‡: (Left upper lobe + Right upper lobe)/2.
Fig 5Incidentally discovered consolidation in the right upper lobe in a CF patient.
A: T2-weighted; B: Fractional ventilation map; C: Calculated perfusion map; D: Room air T1 map; E: Oxygen enhanced T1 map; F: Delta T1 map.