Literature DB >> 29215778

Declines in moth populations stress the need for conserving dark nights.

Frank van Langevelde1, Marijke Braamburg-Annegarn1,2, Martinus E Huigens2, Rob Groendijk2, Olivier Poitevin2, Jurriën R van Deijk2, Willem N Ellis3, Roy H A van Grunsven2,4,5, Rob de Vos6, Rutger A Vos6, Markus Franzén7,8, Michiel F WallisDeVries2,5.   

Abstract

Given the global continuous rise, artificial light at night is often considered a driving force behind moth population declines. Although negative effects on individuals have been shown, there is no evidence for effects on population sizes to date. Therefore, we compared population trends of Dutch macromoth fauna over the period 1985-2015 between moth species that differ in phototaxis and adult circadian rhythm. We found that moth species that show positive phototaxis or are nocturnally active have stronger negative population trends than species that are not attracted to light or are diurnal species. Our results indicate that artificial light at night is an important factor in explaining declines in moth populations in regions with high artificial night sky brightness. Our study supports efforts to reduce the impacts of artificial light at night by promoting lamps that do not attract insects and reduce overall levels of illumination in rural areas to reverse declines of moth populations.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  Lepidoptera; artificial light at night; ecological traits; ecology of the night; light pollution; phototaxis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29215778     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  9 in total

1.  A window to the world of global insect declines: Moth biodiversity trends are complex and heterogeneous.

Authors:  David L Wagner; Richard Fox; Danielle M Salcido; Lee A Dyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Costs and benefits of "insect friendly" artificial lights are taxon specific.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Caroline T Dressler; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Artificial light at night as an environmental pollutant: An integrative approach across taxa, biological functions, and scientific disciplines.

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2018-10

4.  Wavelength-dependent effects of artificial light at night on phytoplankton growth and community structure.

Authors:  Christina Diamantopoulou; Eleni Christoforou; Davide M Dominoni; Eirini Kaiserli; Jakub Czyzewski; Nosrat Mirzai; Sofie Spatharis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 5.  The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Integrated molecular and behavioural data reveal deep circadian disruption in response to artificial light at night in male Great tits (Parus major).

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Maaike de Jong; Kees van Oers; Peter O'Shaughnessy; Gavin J Blackburn; Els Atema; A Christa Mateman; Pietro B D'Amelio; Lisa Trost; Michelle Bellingham; Jessica Clark; Marcel E Visser; Barbara Helm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The rising moon promotes mate finding in moths.

Authors:  Mona Storms; Jacqueline Degen; Aryan Jakhar; Oliver Mitesser; Andreas Jechow; Franz Hölker; Tobias Degen; Thomas Hovestadt
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-04-28

8.  Towards Insect-Friendly Road Lighting-A Transdisciplinary Multi-Stakeholder Approach Involving Citizen Scientists.

Authors:  Sibylle Schroer; Kat Austen; Nicola Moczek; Gregor Kalinkat; Andreas Jechow; Stefan Heller; Johanna Reinhard; Sophia Dehn; Charis I Wuthenow; Martin Post-Stapelfeldt; Roy H A van Grunsven; Catherine Pérez Vega; Heike Schumacher; Leena Kaanaa; Birte Saathoff; Stephan Völker; Franz Hölker
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  A nearly complete database on the records and ecology of the rarest boreal tiger moth from 1840s to 2020.

Authors:  Ivan N Bolotov; Mikhail Yu Gofarov; Evgeny S Koshkin; Vyacheslav V Gorbach; Yury I Bakhaev; Oleg E Berlov; Sergey Yu Gordeev; Yulia S Kolosova; Alexander V Kondakov; Alexey V Korshunov; Grigory S Potapov; Sergey Yu Sinev; Spiridon S Sleptsov; Vitaly M Spitsyn; Evgeny G Strelnikov; Andrey V Timchenko; Risto Haverinen; Kari Nupponen; Hannu Saarenmaa
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 8.501

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.