Kelvin Choi1, Naomi Taylor2, Jean Forster2. 1. 1 Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD, USA. 2. 2 Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the sources of tobacco coupons and their influence on susceptibility to snus use. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort Study. SUBJECTS: A population-based sample of US Midwest young adults in 2011 to 2012 and 2012 to 2013 (aged 22-28; n = 2384). MEASURES: Exposure to coupons for various tobacco products through various sources in the past 6 months, susceptibility to snus use. ANALYSIS: Multiple logistic regressions. RESULTS: During the 6 months prior to 2012 to 2013 survey, 11% of the sample received coupons for cigarettes, 5% received coupons for snus, 3% received coupons for other smokeless tobacco products, and <1% received coupons for little cigars. Direct mail was the most commonly cited source of cigarette and snus coupons. Tobacco product packaging provided the highest number of tobacco coupons for current and former smokers. Participants without a 4-year college education (compared to those who had a 4-year college education) were more likely to have received coupons for cigarettes and snus and received more coupons for both products ( P < .05). Racial/ethnic minority young adults (vs non-Hispanic white) received more cigarette and snus coupons ( P < .05). Receiving snus coupons was positively associated with susceptibility to snus use ( P < .05). CONCLUSION: Tobacco companies are successful in reaching young adults using coupons for various tobacco products. Snus coupons may influence snus use, similar to how cigarette coupons influence smoking.
PURPOSE: To examine the sources of tobacco coupons and their influence on susceptibility to snus use. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort Study. SUBJECTS: A population-based sample of US Midwest young adults in 2011 to 2012 and 2012 to 2013 (aged 22-28; n = 2384). MEASURES: Exposure to coupons for various tobacco products through various sources in the past 6 months, susceptibility to snus use. ANALYSIS: Multiple logistic regressions. RESULTS: During the 6 months prior to 2012 to 2013 survey, 11% of the sample received coupons for cigarettes, 5% received coupons for snus, 3% received coupons for other smokeless tobacco products, and <1% received coupons for little cigars. Direct mail was the most commonly cited source of cigarette and snus coupons. Tobacco product packaging provided the highest number of tobacco coupons for current and former smokers. Participants without a 4-year college education (compared to those who had a 4-year college education) were more likely to have received coupons for cigarettes and snus and received more coupons for both products ( P < .05). Racial/ethnic minority young adults (vs non-Hispanic white) received more cigarette and snus coupons ( P < .05). Receiving snus coupons was positively associated with susceptibility to snus use ( P < .05). CONCLUSION:Tobacco companies are successful in reaching young adults using coupons for various tobacco products. Snus coupons may influence snus use, similar to how cigarette coupons influence smoking.
Entities:
Keywords:
snus; susceptibility; tobacco marketing; young adults
Authors: Alex C Liber; Luz María Sánchez-Romero; Christopher J Cadham; Zhe Yuan; Yameng Li; Hayoung Oh; Steven Cook; Kenneth E Warner; Lisa Henriksen; Ritesh Mistry; Rafael Meza; Nancy L Fleischer; David T Levy Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-10-17 Impact factor: 5.825
Authors: Brittney Keller-Hamilton; Elise M Stevens; Amelia V Wedel; Devin T LaPolt; Alexis Miranda; Theodore L Wagener; Joanne G Patterson Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2021-12-09
Authors: Shyanika W Rose; Allison M Glasser; Yitong Zhou; Tess Boley Cruz; Amy M Cohn; Brianna A Lienemann; M Justin Byron; Li-Ling Huang; Helen I Meissner; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Jennifer B Unger Journal: Tob Control Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 6.953