| Literature DB >> 29214760 |
Yoshiko Takayama1,2, Takashi Tanaka2,3, Koko Oikawa1, Naoki Fukano1, Mieko Goto2, Takashi Takahashi4.
Abstract
Guidelines recommend that clinical laboratories perform phenotypic tests (nitrocefin-based test and penicillin 10-U [P10] or 1-U [P1] zone edge tests) to detect penicillinase in Staphylococcus aureus isolates. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of blaZ encoding penicillinase and perform various phenotypic tests in S. aureus isolates from Japan. We prospectively collected 200 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates from June 2015 to January 2016 and performed six phenotypic tests (nitrocefin-based test, P10 zone edge test/P10 diffusion test, penicillin 2-U [P2] zone edge test/P2 diffusion test, and cloverleaf test) on each sample. We confirmed the presence of blaZ (two blaZ-positive isolates) using PCR. Using blaZ PCR as a standard, we observed a low sensitivity (50%) and positive predictive value (PPV, 50%) of the nitrocefin-based test, low PPV (18.2%) of the P10 zone edge test, low sensitivity (50%) of the P10 diffusion test, low PPV (50% and 22.2%) of the P2 zone edge test and P2 diffusion test, respectively, and low sensitivity (50%) of the cloverleaf test. These data suggest a low performance (sensitivity and PPV) of these six phenotypic tests because of the low prevalence (1%) of blaZ in S. aureus isolates from Japan. © The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine.Entities:
Keywords: Japan; Penicillinase; Phenotypic tests; Staphylococcus aureus; blaZ
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29214760 PMCID: PMC5736675 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.2.155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Lab Med ISSN: 2234-3806 Impact factor: 3.464
Relationship between results of phenotypic penicillinase tests and blaZ PCR as the standard
| Isolate No. | Time of isolation (year/month) | Source | Nitrocefin-based test | P2 zone inhibition test (mm)* | P2 zone edge test | P10 zone inhibition test (mm)† | P10 zone edge test | Cloverleaf test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2015/Jun | Pus | - | 24 (R) | Fuzzy | 44 (S) | Fuzzy | - | - | - |
| 3 | 2015/Jun | Sputum | - | 25 (R) | Fuzzy | 40 (S) | Fuzzy | - | - | - |
| 6 | 2015/Jun | Skin | - | 25 (R) | Fuzzy | 44 (S) | Fuzzy | - | - | - |
| 8 | 2015/Jun | Periunguinal region | - | 25 (R) | Fuzzy | 42 (S) | Fuzzy | - | - | - |
| 10 | 2015/Jun | Sputum | - | 25 (R) | Fuzzy | 39 (S) | Fuzzy | - | - | - |
| 16 | 2015/Jul | Pus | - | 25 (R) | Fuzzy | 44 (S) | Fuzzy | - | - | - |
| 28 | 2015/Jul | Sputum | - | 25 (R) | Sharp | 32 (S) | Sharp | - | + | + |
| 31 | 2015/Jul | Pus | - | 31 (S) | Fuzzy | 44 (S) | Sharp | - | - | - |
| 33 | 2015/Jul | Sputum | + | 15 (R) | Sharp | 20 (R) | Sharp | + | + | + |
| 63 | 2015/Jul | Decubitus | - | 31 (S) | Fuzzy | 37 (S) | Sharp | - | - | - |
| 65 | 2015/Jul | Sputum | - | 31 (S) | Fuzzy | 37 (S) | Sharp | - | - | - |
| 79 | 2015/Aug | Ear discharge | - | 31 (S) | Sharp | 34 (S) | Sharp | - | - | - |
| 85 | 2015/Sep | Stool | - | 32 (S) | Sharp | 37 (S) | Sharp | - | - | - |
| 88 | 2015/Sep | Blood | - | 40 (S) | Fuzzy | 46 (S) | Sharp | - | - | - |
| 93 | 2015/Sep | Sputum | - | 31 (S) | Fuzzy | 36 (S) | Sharp | - | - | - |
| 95 | 2015/Sep | Blood | - | 31 (S) | Fuzzy | 37 (S) | Sharp | - | - | - |
| 121 | 2015/Oct | Pus | - | 32 (S) | Fuzzy | 40 (S) | Sharp | - | - | - |
| 178 | 2015/Dec | Sputum | - | 22 (R) | Fuzzy | 31 (S) | Fuzzy | - | - | - |
| 187 | 2015/Dec | Skin | + | 30 (S) | Fuzzy | 42 (S) | Fuzzy | - | - | - |
| ATCC 25923 | NA | NA | - | 28 (S) | Fuzzy | 34 (S) | Fuzzy | NA | - | - |
| ATCC 29213 | NA | NA | + | 17 (R) | Sharp | 19 (R) | Sharp | + | + | + |
ATCC 25923 and ATCC 29213 were applied as penicillinase-negative and -positive controls, respectively.
*P2 zone diameters were interpreted according to the EUCAST criteria (isolates with P1 diameter of ≤25 mm were considered resistant) [11], and its interpretations are given in parentheses; †P10 zone diameters were interpreted according to the CLSI criteria (isolates with P10 diameter of ≤28 mm were considered resistant) [11], and its interpretations are given in parentheses.
Abbreviations: R, resistant; S, susceptible; NA, not applicable; +, positive; −, negative.
Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of penicillinase tests using blaZ PCR as the standard
| Penicillinase test | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrocefin-based test | 50 | 99.5 | 50 | 99.5 |
| P2 zone diameter interpretation* | 100 | 96.5 | 22.2 | 100 |
| P2 zone edge test | 100 | 99 | 50 | 100 |
| P10 zone diameter interpretation† | 50 | 100 | 100 | 99.5 |
| P10 zone edge test | 100 | 95.5 | 18.2 | 100 |
| Cloverleaf test | 50 | 100 | 100 | 99.5 |
*P2 zone diameters were interpreted according to the EUCAST criteria (isolates with a P1 diameter of ≤25 mm were considered resistant) [11]; †P10 zone diameters were interpreted according to the CLSI criteria (isolates with a P10 diameter of ≤28 mm were considered resistant) [11].
Prevalence of blaZ among Staphylococcus aureus isolates in previous reports and the current study
| Year of report (reference) | Country of isolation (total N of collected isolates) | Percentage (%) of | Primer set used to amplify | Amplicon size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 [ | Germany (197) | 14.2 | stau- | 421 |
| 2011 [ | Japan (450) | 2.7 | stau- | 421 |
| 2012 [ | United States (105) | 9.5 | stau- | 421, 377, & 674 |
| 2014 [ | Australia (157) | 24.2 | blaZ-F/blaZ-R | 326 |
| 2014 [ | Japan (170) | 3.5 | ND | ND |
| 2017 [ | Switzerland (215) | 40.9 | 418 & 533 | |
| This report | Japan (200) | 1 | stau- | 421 & 674 |
Abbreviation: ND, not described.