Literature DB >> 24452169

Performance of phenotypic tests for detection of penicillinase in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Australia.

Lito E Papanicolas1, Jan M Bell, Ivan Bastian.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that chromogenic cephalosporin tests are inferior to disc zone edge tests in detecting penicillinase in Staphylococcus aureus isolates, resulting in a change to CLSI and EUCAST guidelines in 2012. We sought to confirm these findings using Australian isolates and compare the performance of the CLSI and EUCAST methods, which use different disc strengths, penicillin at 10 units (P10) and 1 unit (P1), respectively. Using blaZ PCR as the reference standard, the sensitivities of the tests for detection of penicillinase production were as follows: Cefinase disc test, 24/38 isolates (63%); P10 disc zone edge test, 34/38 isolates (89%); P10 disc diameter test, 25/38 isolates (66%); P1 disc zone edge test, 38/38 isolates (100%); and P1 disc diameter test, 38/38 isolates (100%). We also found that the P10 disc zone edge test reading was interpreted differently by the clinical laboratory and the study investigators in 11% of instances. Our findings support those of previous studies showing that chromogenic cephalosporin-based β-lactamase tests are inferior to disc methods in detecting S. aureus penicillinase. We also conclude that the EUCAST method using the P1 disc has the best performance, particularly because the P1 disc zone diameter reading closely correlated with penicillinase production and reading of the disc zone diameter is less subjective than reading of the zone edge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24452169      PMCID: PMC3993472          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.03068-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  3 in total

1.  Correlation of penicillin minimum inhibitory concentrations and penicillin zone edge appearance with staphylococcal beta-lactamase production.

Authors:  V J Gill; C B Manning; C M Ingalls
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of phenotypic methods for penicillinase detection in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M Kaase; S Lenga; S Friedrich; F Szabados; T Sakinc; B Kleine; S G Gatermann
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Presence of the bla(Z) beta-lactamase gene in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus that appear penicillin susceptible by conventional phenotypic methods.

Authors:  Rana E El Feghaly; Jennifer E Stamm; Stephanie A Fritz; Carey-Ann D Burnham
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.803

  3 in total
  10 in total

1.  Increasing Rates of Penicillin Sensitivity in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Guillaume Butler-Laporte; Todd C Lee; Matthew P Cheng
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

Authors:  Joanne S K Teh; Ioanna Pantelis; Xiao Chen; Tania Sadlon; Kelly Papanaoum; David L Gordon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 11.677

3.  Detection and Prevalence of Penicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the United States in 2013.

Authors:  S S Richter; G V Doern; K P Heilmann; S Miner; S Tendolkar; F Riahi; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

Authors:  Malin Hagstrand Aldman; Lisa I Påhlman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Molecular Epidemiology of Penicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Australia and Reliability of Diagnostic Phenotypic Susceptibility Methods to Detect Penicillin Susceptibility.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Coombs; Nicholas W T Yee; Denise Daley; Catherine M Bennett; James O Robinson; Marc Stegger; Princy Shoby; Shakeel Mowlaboccus
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-08-15

6.  Evaluation of methods for detection of β-lactamase production in MSSA.

Authors:  Robert Skov; David R Lonsway; Jesper Larsen; Anders Rhod Larsen; Jurgita Samulioniené; Brandi M Limbago
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.758

7.  Prevalence of blaZ Gene and Performance of Phenotypic Tests to Detect Penicillinase in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Japan.

Authors:  Yoshiko Takayama; Takashi Tanaka; Koko Oikawa; Naoki Fukano; Mieko Goto; Takashi Takahashi
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 8.  Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria: Rubik's Cube of Clinical Microbiology?

Authors:  Márió Gajdács; Gabriella Spengler; Edit Urbán
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-07

Review 9.  The Continuing Threat of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Márió Gajdács
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-02

10.  Performance of penicillinase detection tests in Staphylococcus epidermidis: comparison of different phenotypic methods.

Authors:  Benjamin Aubry; Carole Lemarié; Rachel Chenouard; Marie Kempf; Matthieu Eveillard; Hélène Pailhoriès
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.605

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.