Literature DB >> 29214577

Patient Empowerment and Involvement in Research.

Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez1,2,3, Amado Rivero-Santana4,5,6, Analia Abt-Sacks6, Ana Toledo-Chavarri6, Noe Brito6, Yolanda Álvarez-Pérez6, Nerea González-Hernández4,7, Pedro Serrano-Aguilar8,4,5.   

Abstract

Patients with rare diseases often face difficulties in clinical care due to the low prevalence of their diseases and the resulting healthcare professionals' lack of expertise. Valid and standardized guidelines for clinical management are also lacking due to the scarcity of research and the variability of the clinical expressivity within each disease. In addition, in cases of rare diseases, the patient and health professional relationship may not fit with the traditional assumptions of medical care. Although the communication process between patients and healthcare professionals shares most of the general features of the standard patient-health professional interaction, rare diseases may be burdened with additional issues.In this sense, clinical decision-making in an uncertainty context should take advantage of involving patients in deeper informational process to promote valid shared decision-making between patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals. This process of patient/caregiver empowerment is a priority in the context of rare diseases, as it encourages acquisition of information that will help improving patient-healthcare professional's interaction, and building a collaborative relationship. It is also a chance for healthcare professionals to learn about rare diseases from the perspective of patients.Engagement of patients and other stakeholders in clinical research may help to ensure that research efforts in rare diseases address relevant clinical questions and patient-centered health outcomes. However, the effectiveness of patient-engagement approaches, particularly for the study of rare diseases, has not been well studied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient Involvement; Patient empowerment; Patient participation; Patient-centered care; Rare diseases; Research; Shared decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29214577     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  4 in total

Review 1.  Psychological Aspect and Quality of Life in Porphyrias: A Review.

Authors:  Granata Francesca; Annamaria Nicolli; Alessia Colaiocco; Elena Di Pierro; Giovanna Graziadei
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-10

2.  Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.

Authors:  Heather A Olden; Sara Santarossa; Dana Murphy; Christine C Johnson; Karen E Kippen
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2022-01-17

3.  Community Consensus Guidelines to Support FAIR Data Standards in Clinical Research Studies in Primary Mitochondrial Disease.

Authors:  Amel Karaa; Laura E MacMullen; John C Campbell; John Christodoulou; Bruce H Cohen; Thomas Klopstock; Yasutoshi Koga; Costanza Lamperti; Rob van Maanen; Robert McFarland; Sumit Parikh; Shamima Rahman; Fernando Scaglia; Alexander V Sherman; Philip Yeske; Marni J Falk
Journal:  Adv Genet (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-12-19

4.  Stakeholders' views on drug development: the congenital disorders of glycosylation community perspective.

Authors:  Maria Monticelli; Rita Francisco; Sandra Brasil; Dorinda Marques-da-Silva; Tatiana Rijoff; Carlota Pascoal; Jaak Jaeken; Paula A Videira; Vanessa Dos Reis Ferreira
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.303

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.