| Literature DB >> 29214502 |
Furui Tan1,2, Weizhe Xu3,4, Xiaodong Hu3,4, Ping Yu3,4, Weifeng Zhang3,4.
Abstract
Organic/inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cell has emerged as a very promising candidate for the next generation of near-commercial photovoltaic devices. Here in this work, we focus on the inverted perovskite solar cells and have found that remarkable photovoltaic performance could be obtained when using cadmium selenide (CdSe) quantum dots (QDs) as electron transporting layer (ETL) and lithium fluoride (LiF) as the buffer, with respect to the traditionally applied and high-cost [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM). The easily processed and low-cost CdSe QDs/LiF double layer could facilitate convenient electron-transfer and collection at the perovskite/cathode interface, promoting an optoelectric conversion efficiency of as high as 15.1%, very close to that with the traditional PCBM ETL. Our work provides another promising choice on the ETL materials for the highly efficient and low-cost perovskite solar cells.Entities:
Keywords: Electron transport; Inverted structure; Perovskite; Quantum dot; Solar cell
Year: 2017 PMID: 29214502 PMCID: PMC5718992 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-017-2381-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1SEM and AFM topology of bare perovskite film (a, b) and CdSe/LiF-covered perovskite film (c, d)
Fig. 2Light absorption (a), photoluminescence (b), and time-resolved PL spectrum of the perovskite films with and without ETL layer (c). Device skeleton and energy level alignment at the interface (d)
Fig. 3Photovoltaic performance of solar cells w/o and with CdSe QD layers with different thickness (a). External quantum efficiency and the integrated current density of the optimized solar cell (b)
Photovoltaic performance of inverted MAPbI3 solar cells with different thickness (T.) of CdSe QD layer
|
| Voc (V) | Jsc (mA cm−2) | FF (%) | Eff (%) | Rss (Ω) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.88 | 10.0 | 47.7 | 4.2 | 29 |
| 10 | 0.94 | 18.1 | 63.5 | 10.8 | 16 |
| 25 | 0.99 | 20.5 | 69.9 | 14.2 | 9 |
| 40 | 0.93 | 14.9 | 50.0 | 6.9 | 31 |
Fig. 4Performance statistics of the solar cells (a), I-V curves of the forward and reverse-can mode of the best solar cell (b) and comparison of performance stability of the solar cells with and without ETL (c)
Fig. 5Dark current density (a) and electrochemical impedance spectrum (b) of the solar cells with and without ETL
Fig. 6Light intensity dependence of current density (a) and surface photovoltage spectrum (b) of the solar cells