| Literature DB >> 29214374 |
Weina Gao1, Lingling Pu2, Jingyu Wei1, Zhanxin Yao1, Yawen Wang1, Tala Shi1, Liting Zhao1, Changya Jiao3, Changjiang Guo4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Propolis is a natural product with many biological activities. The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of Chinese propolis on glucose metabolism, antioxidant function, and inflammatory cytokines in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant function; Chinese propolis; Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2017 PMID: 29214374 PMCID: PMC5801227 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-017-0341-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Ther ISSN: 1869-6961 Impact factor: 2.945
General characteristics of the subjects at baseline
| Parameter | Control | Chinese propolis |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects (M/F) | 30 (14/16) | 31 (11/20) |
| Age (year) | 60.6 ± 8.4 | 57.7 ± 7.5 |
| Body height (cm) | 166.0 ± 8.5 | 164.6 ± 8.0 |
| Body weight (kg) | 74.5 ± 9.9 | 70.0 ± 10.4 |
| WHR | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.6 ± 2.6 | 25.2 ± 2.3 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 8.3 ± 2.4 | 8.7 ± 2.8 |
| Glycosylated hemoglobin (%) | 7.8 ± 1.2 | 8.2 ± 1.7 |
| Insulin (μIU/mL) | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.3 |
| FRAP (mmol/L) | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 107.0 ± 25.8 | 111.7 ± 16.0 |
| GSH-Px (U/L) | 172.8 ± 96.6 | 161.9 ± 91.0 |
| LDH (U/L) | 233.5 ± 59.8 | 253.8 ± 110.8 |
| GSH (g/L) | 19.4 ± 6.8 | 20.3 ± 8.0 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 16.9 ± 8.2 | 18.7 ± 6.0 |
Daily intakes of energy and nutrients in patients with T2DM
| Parameter | Control ( | Chinese propolis ( |
|---|---|---|
| Energy (kcal) | 1495.2 ± 346.5 | 1445.9 ± 448.4 |
| Protein (g) | 59.6 ± 15.9 | 56.3 ± 16.1 |
| Lipids (g) | 42.8 ± 17.1 | 45.8 ± 25.2 |
| Cholesterol (mg) | 471.9 ± 226.4 | 458.6 ± 163.8 |
| Carbohydrates (g) | 223.9 ± 52.5 | 207.9 ± 58.3 |
| Fiber (g) | 12.4 ± 4.7 | 12.5 ± 4.1 |
| Retinol (μg RE) | 470.5 ± 223.4 | 498.2 ± 313.4 |
| Thiamin (mg) | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.4 |
| Riboflavin (mg) | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.4 |
| Niacin (mg) | 11.0 ± 3.9 | 11.1 ± 4.3 |
| Ascorbic acid (mg) | 94.1 ± 38.9 | 100.1 ± 66.0 |
| Tocopherol (mg) | 13.2 ± 8.5 | 15.6 ± 6.3 |
| Potassium (mg) | 1809.4 ± 540.4 | 1769.8 ± 558.1 |
| Sodium (mg) | 831.9 ± 408.0 | 808.8 ± 375.9 |
| Calcium (mg) | 512.8 ± 195.2 | 521.1 ± 350.1 |
| Iron (mg) | 19.6 ± 9.9 | 19.2 ± 9.3 |
| Zinc (mg) | 8.6 ± 2.3 | 8.2 ± 2.5 |
| Selenium (μg) | 48.3 ± 16.6 | 46.1 ± 15.3 |
Comparison of the glucose metabolism data between baseline and the end of the trial in T2DM patients
| Parameter | Control | Chinese propolis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 18 weeks | Baseline | 18 weeks | |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 8.3 ± 2.4 | 8.4 ± 2.4 | 8.7 ± 2.8 | 8.5 ± 2.0 |
| Glycosylated hemoglobin (%) | 7.8 ± 1.2 | 7.6 ± 1.2 | 8.2 ± 1.7 | 7.9 ± 1.4 |
| Insulin (uIU/mL) | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
Antioxidant function and inflammatory cytokines in T2DM patients at the end of the trial
| Parameter | Control ( | Chinese propolis ( |
|---|---|---|
| FRAP (mmol/L) | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.3 |
| GSH (g/L) | 2.2 ± 1.0 | 7.4 ± 1.4* |
| Total flavonoids (mg/L) | 51.5 ± 13.1 | 64.1 ± 15.4* |
| Total polyphenols (mg/L) | 199.9 ± 12.6 | 212.4 ± 24.2* |
| SOD (U/mL) | 102.8 ± 3.1 | 104.3 ± 3.4 |
| GSH-Px (U/L) | 253.7 ± 74.9 | 262.2 ± 56.4 |
| LDH (U/L) | 1446.7 ± 202.1 | 1224.9 ± 318.5* |
| MDA (mmol/L) | 3.9 ± 1.2 | 4.3 ± 0.9 |
| Carbonyls (nmol/mg prot) | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 3.1 ± 0.9 | 3.7 ± 1.2* |
| IL-1β (pg/mL) | 18.7 ± 3.5 | 18.6 ± 3.8 |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 20.7 ± 3.7 | 20.6 ± 4.1 |
* p < 0.05 compared with control
Effects of Chinese propolis on each gender by the end of the trial
| Parameter | Male | Female | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Chinese propolis | Control | Chinese propolis | |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 8.5 ± 2.5 | 8.6 ± 2.2 | 8.4 ± 2.3 | 9.4 ± 3.1 |
| Glycosylated hemoglobin (%) | 7.6 ± 0.9 | 7.8 ± 1.1 | 7.8 ± 1.4 | 7.9 ± 1.5 |
| Insulin (μIU/mL) | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.2 |
| Adiponectin (mg/L) | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
| Aldose reductase (μg/L) | 0.7 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.4 |
| Total polyphenols (mg/L) | 204.4 ± 13.1 | 208.0 ± 13.3 | 196.2 ± 11.3 | 214.4 ± 25.1* |
| Total flavonoids (mg/L) | 55.8 ± 13.4 | 61.2 ± 12.1 | 48.1 ± 12.2 | 65.8 ± 17.1* |
| GSH (g/L) | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 7.2 ± 1.0* | 2.0 ± 1.5 | 7.4 ± 1.6* |
| FRAP (mmol/L) | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
| SOD (U) | 101.7 ± 3.5 | 103.8 ± 5.1 | 103.6 ± 2.5 | 104.4 ± 2.5 |
| GSH-Px (U) | 281.1 ± 71.2 | 267.1 ± 56.9 | 231.4 ± 72.3 | 259.9 ± 57.7 |
| LDH (U/L) | 1466.4 ± 195.5 | 1242.0 ± 176.5* | 1431.0 ± 212.6 | 1292.6 ± 208.0* |
| MDA (nmol/ml) | 4.3 ± 1.3 | 4.23 ± 0.64 | 3.7 ± 1.1 | 4.3 ± 1.0 |
| Carbonyls (nmol/mg prot) | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 3.2 ± 0.9 | 3.7 ± 1.7 | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 3.7 ± 0.9* |
| IL-1β (pg/mL) | 19.2 ± 3.0 | 18.3 ± 4.5 | 18.3 ± 4.0 | 18.7 ± 3.6 |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 21.3 ± 3.0 | 17.9 ± 4.6 | 20.1 ± 4.4 | 21.5 ± 3.7 |
* p < 0.05, compared with control