| Literature DB >> 29214176 |
Ya-Ping Hou1,2, Qing-Qing He3, Hai-Mei Ouyang4, Hai-Shan Peng1,2, Qun Wang3, Jie Li3, Xiao-Fei Lv4, Yi-Nan Zheng4, Shao-Chuan Li3, Hai-Liang Liu3, Ai-Hua Yin1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the gut microbiota differences of obese children compared with the control healthy cohort to result in further understanding of the mechanism of obesity development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29214176 PMCID: PMC5682041 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7585989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Composition comparison of fecal microbiota between the obese and control group. Plot of fecal microbiota based on the weighted UniFrac metric with principal coordinate analysis results.
Figure 2Community population differences between the obese and control group. Enrichment microbes from obese samples are marked red, while the control samples are marked green.
Figure 3Functional changes derived from the obesity-associated gut microbiota. All significantly different level 3 pathways are illustrated and colored according to level 2 pathway categories. Ordinate indicated metabolic pathways; different colors represent the classification of different metabolic pathways. Each pathway has two box figures, which represent the expression of obese children and control samples in this metabolic pathway. Significant changes in the relative abundance of estimated genes summarized by KEGG pathway annotations between obese children and controls are shown with P values < 0.05.
Figure 4Abundance results of significant clusters of core OTUs for samples during 0, 30, 60, and 90 days of the dietary intervention. The asterisk indicates the statistical significance of P value < 0.01. OTUs species information in node_10 is listed in Table S3. indicates the statistical significance of P value <0.01 compared with the dark grey sample (as control) in node_10.