Fernando E Taragano1, Ricardo F Allegri1, Constantine Lyketsos2. 1. Servicio de Neuropsicología (SIREN), y Unidad de Investigación "René Barón" del Instituto Universitario CEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 2. Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry, Johns Hopkins University and Hospital, Baltimore, USA.
Abstract
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was defined by Petersen et al. (1999) as progressive memory loss, a prodrome of Alzheimer's disease. MCI is a well-established entity that can be both a diagnosis in medical practice and a valid target of Alzheimer's prevention therapy. More recently MCI has expanded to include other cognitive domains with other potential causes: amnestic MCI, multiple domains MCI, and single domain non-amnestic MCI. Behavioral symptoms in MCI are associated with a higher risk of dementia, but their association with dementia risk in patients without MCI is unknown. The objective of our paper was to address the question of whether aging patients with behavioral symptoms with or without cognitive impairment represent a population at risk for dementia. Mild Behavioral Impairment (MBI) defines a late life syndrome with prominent psychiatric and related behavioral symptoms in the absence of major cognitive symptoms. MBI also appears to be a transitional state between normal aging and dementia. MBI may carry a higher risk for dementia than MCI. A subgroup of MBI patients is likely to exhibit symptoms of a frontotemporal dementia (FTD) prodrome. We proposed 4 subtypes of patients at risk for dementia: amnestic MCI (which is said to progress preferentially to Alzheimer's disease), multiple domain MCI (which may represent normal aging or may progress to vascular cognitive impairment or a neurodegenerative disorder), single domain non-amnestic MCI, and MBI (which may progress to frontotemporal dementia, Lewy Body dementia or Alzheimer's disease). We concluded that MBI is a counterpart of MCI as a transitional state between normal aging and dementia. These findings have implications for early detection, prevention, and treatment of patients with late-life dementia.
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was defined by Petersen et al. (1999) as progressive memory loss, a prodrome of Alzheimer's disease. MCI is a well-established entity that can be both a diagnosis in medical practice and a valid target of Alzheimer's prevention therapy. More recently MCI has expanded to include other cognitive domains with other potential causes: amnestic MCI, multiple domains MCI, and single domain non-amnestic MCI. Behavioral symptoms in MCI are associated with a higher risk of dementia, but their association with dementia risk in patients without MCI is unknown. The objective of our paper was to address the question of whether aging patients with behavioral symptoms with or without cognitive impairment represent a population at risk for dementia. Mild Behavioral Impairment (MBI) defines a late life syndrome with prominent psychiatric and related behavioral symptoms in the absence of major cognitive symptoms. MBI also appears to be a transitional state between normal aging and dementia. MBI may carry a higher risk for dementia than MCI. A subgroup of MBI patients is likely to exhibit symptoms of a frontotemporal dementia (FTD) prodrome. We proposed 4 subtypes of patients at risk for dementia: amnestic MCI (which is said to progress preferentially to Alzheimer's disease), multiple domain MCI (which may represent normal aging or may progress to vascular cognitive impairment or a neurodegenerative disorder), single domain non-amnestic MCI, and MBI (which may progress to frontotemporal dementia, Lewy Body dementia or Alzheimer's disease). We concluded that MBI is a counterpart of MCI as a transitional state between normal aging and dementia. These findings have implications for early detection, prevention, and treatment of patients with late-life dementia.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a globally widespread chronic condition that seriously
affects patients, their families and society.[1,2] An understanding of
prodromal stages or early clinical presentations of AD is a significant priority since
it would aid early detection, facilitate early treatment, and lead to prevention. There
is a clinical cognitive continuum from normal aging to AD. Cognitive decline without
dementia has been commonly considered to be a normal consequence of brain aging, but it
can also indicate the onset of dementia. The boundary between normal aging and very
early AD is becoming a major focus of research. Pre-dementia diagnosis is closely
connected with the development of AD prevention therapies.Many attempts have been made to define aging-related cognitive decline. The idea of
aging-effects versus disease is not new; in 1962, Kral et al.,[3] described “benign senescent forgetfulness” (BSF) in
which fairly unimportant details of an experience (e.g. a name, a place or a date) are
not recalled but do not interfere with activities of daily living and do not progress to
dementia. Kral also recognized that “differentiation of the benign and malignant types
of senescent forgetfulness does not necessarily mean that there are two
neuropathological processes”.[3] These
diagnostic criteria were imprecise, and had not been validated in controlled
longitudinal studies. These cognitive changes in aging have been assigned various terms,
such as age-associated memory impairment,[4] late-life forgetfulness[5] and aging-associated cognitive decline.[6] These terms have been used largely to explain the
extremes of normal aging, to characterize individuals who are neither normal nor
demented. Such terms were criticized for being inaccurate.Mild cognitive impairment was initially described in the late 1990s by Flicker and
colleagues[7] and denoted persons
met criteria for stage 3 on the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS)[8] or 0.5 on the Clinical Dementia Rating
(CDR) instrument.[9] GDS and CDR are
severity rating scales and not diagnostic instruments. Both stages may correspond to MCI
or may describe individuals with very mild dementia.[10] Flicker proposed a clinical continuum from normal aging through
mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. MCI was not normal aging: this
construct was intended to be a clinical description of persons who were expected to
develop AD.[11]The identification of persons at risk of developing dementia, particularly Alzheimer’s
disease, is of major economic importance, especially if preventive strategies or
therapeutic actions are to be developed. This challenge explains the popularity of the
concept of MCI and its wide application in the epidemiological, clinical, para-clinical
and therapeutic domains.Petersen diagnostic criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment[11] included: memory complaint preferably corroborated by
an informant, memory impairment relative to age and education-matched healthy
individuals, preserved general cognitive function, intact activities of daily living and
no clinical evidence of dementia.It is clear that the chosen definition of cognitive impairment will have a major impact
on prevalence estimates. This impact could also extend to prognosis although these
definitions describe syndromes and do not address causality.[12]The international working group on MCI criteria[13] included: the individual is neither normal nor demented;
evidence of cognitive impairment, as shown by objectively measured decline over time or
subjective report of decline by self or informant in conjunction with objective
cognitive deficits; preserved activities of daily living and intact or minimally
impaired complex instrumental functions. These criteria expand the construct of MCI to
cognitive domains beyond memory and present MCI as a prodrome of multiple types of
dementia.[14]De Kosky and Chertkow[15] proposed 3
subtypes of MCI: amnestic MCI, multiple domains MCI, and single domain non-amnestic MCI.
Supporting studies are underway to determine whether amnestic and non-amnestic MCI have
different prognoses of progression to dementia and which type of dementia they
predict.[16] They propose that
amnestic MCI progresses preferentially to Alzheimer’s disease, multiple domains MCI may
represent normal aging or may progress to vascular cognitive impairment or a
neurodegenerative disorder, while single domain non-amnestic MCI may progress to
frontotemporal dementia, Lewy Body dementia or Alzheimer’s disease (Figure 1).
Subtypes of mild cognitive impairment. MCI, mild cognitive impairment; AD,
Alzheimer’s disease; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; LBD, Lewy Body disease;
VD, vascular dementia.In clinical-based studies, the typical rate at which MCI patients progress to AD is 10 to
15% per year in contrast with the incidence rates for the development of dementia in
normal elderly subjects of 1–2% per year.[11] In population-based studies, the prognosis of MCI deficits seems
much less ominous. Ritchie et al.[17]
found that only 22% of MCI subjects developed degenerative dementia over an 8-year
follow-up period. Rates of progression are widely discrepant across studies and
populations.[17-20] These discrepancies are partly related to the nature
of the populations (clinical/referral vs. community-based) and length of follow-up. They
also seem to be due, in large part, to the different definitions and inclusion criteria
that used in the studies[18] Most
amnesic MCIpatients who died appeared to have been transitional between the
neuropathological changes found in aging and characteristics of very early AD.[21]We could hypothesize that, at least for some patients, the natural clinical course of
Alzheimer could be “presymptomatic AD”, “pre-dementia AD or MCI of AD type” and
“Dementia of AD” (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Hypothesized natural course of Alzheimer’s disease.
Hypothesized natural course of Alzheimer’s disease.In the last several years, there has been growing awareness of the importance of
neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPchS) in dementia, given their near universal occurrence
over the course of dementia, associated caregiver burden, and correlation with early
institutionalization. Whereas dementia is still defined as a cognitive disorder,
neuropsychiatric symptoms are now regarded as an intrinsic aspect of dementia, and the
underlying causes usually as neurodegenerative processes.Although neuropsychiatric symptoms are common in dementia[22-26] they have
received less attention in the prodromal stages of dementia. In a population-based
study, the most common neuropsychiatric symptoms in MCI were apathy, depression,
agitation, delusions, hallucinations, and sleep impairment.[27,28] In MCI
patients, the occurrence of neuropsychiatric symptoms is associated with a higher risk
for the onset of dementia. For example, depression in MCI has been reported to double
the risk of dementia.[28,29] Furthermore, cognitively normal
elderly individuals who develop depression are at increased risk for subsequent
MCI.[30] However, not all
prodromal stages involve prominent cognitive impairment. Many patients develop
neuropsychiatric symptoms as the first indicator of impending dementia. This is most
common in patients with FTD, but it is also the case in patients with AD. For example,
we reported that psychiatric symptoms were the first indication of change, before the
occurrence of cognitive symptoms, in 50% of all dementiapatients who consulted our
service. Of these patients, 36% had FTD, 28% had AD; 18% had VaD and 18% had other types
of dementia.[31] As a result, we
proposed the “Mild Behavioural Impairment” (MBI) syndrome, consisting of: persistent
behavioral changes and mild psychiatric symptoms, especially disinhibition; non serious
cognitive complaints; normal activities of daily living; and absence of
dementia.[31-35].Between January 2001 and January 2006, a new consecutive series of 1491 elderly
outpatients were evaluated in our Unit (CEMIC Cohort). After a thorough neuropsychiatric
assessment, 425 were found to present with cognitive and/or behavioral symptoms; 119 of
these were found to have MBI and 239, MCI, whereas 17 presented with late onset
psychosis. The median follow up was 30 months.[34,35].Graph 1 compares age-adjusted Kaplan-Meier plots of
the time to conversion to dementia between both groups. Conversion was faster in MBI
patients.
Age-adjusted survival functions by initial diagnosis. Kaplan Meier Survival
Analysis. Analysis time: in months. MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MBI,
mild behavioral impairment.The MBI group converted to dementia much faster than the MCI group. MBI patients were
more likely to convert to FTD (44.5%), AD (22.7%) and LBD (4.2%).An analysis was performed to compare rates of conversion to dementia in the following
groups:a) MCI without neuropsychiatric symptoms,b) MCI with neuropsychiatric symptoms,c) MBI with cognitive symptomsd) MBI without cognitive symptoms.MCI without NPS, and MBI without cognitive symptoms were quite different in terms of time
to dementia onset, which proved much faster for MBI without cognitive symptoms than for
MCI without NPS (log-rank test Χ2(3)=42.87 p<0.001) and MCI
patients with psychiatric symptoms differed from MCI patients with no psychiatric
symptoms in that they had a 4- fold greater risk of conversion to dementia (HR 4.01, 95%
Conf. Interval 2.5-6.3) (Graph 2)
Graph 2
Kaplan-Meier estimate suvival by diagnosis.
Kaplan-Meier estimate suvival by diagnosis.MBI patients developed frontotemporal dementia more often than other types of dementia.
Overall, in both MCI and MBI groups, the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms (with or
without cognitive symptoms) was more strongly associated with conversion to dementia
than the presence or severity of cognitive impairment. Patients with MBI experienced a
more rapid conversion to dementia than those with MCI.We proposed 4 subtypes of patients at risk for dementia: amnestic MCI (which is said to
progress preferentially to Alzheimer’s disease), multiple domain MCI (which may
represent normal aging or may progress to vascular cognitive impairment or
neurodegenerative disorder), single domain non-amnestic MCI (which may progress to
fronto-temporal dementia, Lewy Body dementia or Alzheimer’s disease) and MBI (which may
progress preferentially to fronto-temporal dementia, Lewy Body dementia, or Alzheimer’s
disease (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Subtypes of patients at risk for dementia. MCI, mild cognitive impairment;
AD, Alzheimer’s disease; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; LBD, Lewy Body
disease; VD, vascular dementia.
Subtypes of patients at risk for dementia. MCI, mild cognitive impairment;
AD, Alzheimer’s disease; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; LBD, Lewy Body
disease; VD, vascular dementia.
Conclusions
We concluded that MBI is a counterpart of MCI as a transitional state between normal
aging and dementia. MBI carries a higher risk for conversion to dementia than MCI.
This review emphasizes the importance of neuropsychiatry symptoms as critical
aspects of late-life cognitive disorders. A better understanding of these
observations may contribute to early detection of dementia and therapy targets, and
possibly enable prevention..
Authors: Serge Gauthier; Barry Reisberg; Michael Zaudig; Ronald C Petersen; Karen Ritchie; Karl Broich; Sylvie Belleville; Henry Brodaty; David Bennett; Howard Chertkow; Jeffrey L Cummings; Mony de Leon; Howard Feldman; Mary Ganguli; Harald Hampel; Philip Scheltens; Mary C Tierney; Peter Whitehouse; Bengt Winblad Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ricardo F Allegri; Judith Butman; Raúl L Arizaga; Gerardo Machnicki; Cecilia Serrano; Fernando E Taragano; Diego Sarasola; Leandro Lon Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2006-07-27 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Ronald C Petersen; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson; Kris A Johnson; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Gregory A Jicha; Robert J Ivnik; Glenn E Smith; Eric G Tangalos; Heiko Braak; Emre Kokmen Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2006-05
Authors: Yonas E Geda; David S Knopman; David A Mrazek; Gregory A Jicha; Glenn E Smith; Selamawit Negash; Bradley F Boeve; Robert J Ivnik; Ronald C Petersen; V Shane Pankratz; Walter A Rocca Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2006-03
Authors: Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos; Elizabeth A Wise; Constantine G Lyketsos; Gwenn S Smith Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-09-02 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Felix Geser; Tibor C G Mitrovics; Johannes Haybaeck; Deniz Yilmazer-Hanke Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Lena Sannemann; Ann-Katrin Schild; Slawek Altenstein; Claudia Bartels; Frederic Brosseron; Katharina Buerger; Nicoleta Carmen Cosma; Klaus Fliessbach; Silka Dawn Freiesleben; Wenzel Glanz; Michael T Heneka; Daniel Janowitz; Ingo Kilimann; Xenia Kobeleva; Christoph Laske; Coraline D Metzger; Matthias H J Munk; Robert Perneczky; Oliver Peters; Alexandra Polcher; Josef Priller; Boris Rauchmann; Christina Rösch; Janna Rudolph; Anja Schneider; Annika Spottke; Eike Jakob Spruth; Stefan Teipel; Ruth Vukovich; Michael Wagner; Jens Wiltfang; Steffen Wolfsgruber; Emrah Duezel; Frank Jessen Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Claudia Carrarini; Mirella Russo; Fedele Dono; Filomena Barbone; Marianna G Rispoli; Laura Ferri; Martina Di Pietro; Anna Digiovanni; Paola Ajdinaj; Rino Speranza; Alberto Granzotto; Valerio Frazzini; Astrid Thomas; Andrea Pilotto; Alessandro Padovani; Marco Onofrj; Stefano L Sensi; Laura Bonanni Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 4.003