Literature DB >> 29212863

Modelling the implications of reducing smoking prevalence: the benefits of increasing the UK tobacco duty escalator to public health and economic outcomes.

Andre Knuchel-Takano1, Daniel Hunt2, Abbygail Jaccard1, Arti Bhimjiyani3, Martin Brown1, Lise Retat1, Katrina Brown4, Sebastian Hinde5, Chit Selvarajah2, Linda Bauld2,6, Laura Webber1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Taxing tobacco is one of the most effective ways to reduce smoking prevalence, mitigate its devastating consequential health harms and progress towards a tobacco-free society. This study modelled the health and economic impacts of increasing the existing cigarette tobacco duty escalator (TDE) in the UK from the current 2% above consumer price inflation to 5%.
METHODS: A two-stage modelling process was used. First, a non-linear multivariate regression model was fitted to cross-sectional smoking data, creating longitudinal projections from 2015 to 2035. Second, these projections were used to predict the future incidence, prevalence and cost of 17 smoking-related diseases using a Monte Carlo microsimulation approach. A sustained increase in the duty escalator was evaluated against a baseline of continuing historical smoking trends and the existing duty escalator.
RESULTS: A sustained increase in the TDE is projected to reduce adult smoking prevalence to 6% in 2035, from 10% in a baseline scenario. After increasing the TDE, only 65% of female and 60% of male would-be smokers would actually be smoking in 2035. The intervention is projected to avoid around 75 200 new cases of smoking-related diseases between 2015 and 2035. In 2035 alone, £49 m in National Health Service and social care costs and £192 m in societal premature mortality and morbidity costs are projected to be avoided.
CONCLUSION: Increasing the UK TDE to 5% above inflation could effectively reduce smoking prevalence, prevent diseases and avoid healthcare costs. It would deliver substantial progress towards a tobacco-free society and should be implemented by the UK Government with urgency. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cessation; economics; end game; prevention; taxation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29212863     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  4 in total

1.  The Rapidly Expanding Nexus of Immunoglobulin G N-Glycomics, Suboptimal Health Status, and Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Alyce Russell; Wei Wang
Journal:  Exp Suppl       Date:  2021

2.  Future smoking prevalence by socioeconomic status in England: a computational modelling study.

Authors:  Fujian Song; Tim Elwell-Sutton; Felix Naughton; Sarah Gentry
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Research on lung cancer and its funding, 2004-2018.

Authors:  Mursheda Begum; Isobel Urquhart; Grant Lewison; Fouad Fouad; Richard Sullivan
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2020-11-03

4.  Estimating the costs of air pollution to the National Health Service and social care: An assessment and forecast up to 2035.

Authors:  Laura Pimpin; Lise Retat; Daniela Fecht; Laure de Preux; Franco Sassi; John Gulliver; Annalisa Belloni; Brian Ferguson; Emily Corbould; Abbygail Jaccard; Laura Webber
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 11.069

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.