Literature DB >> 29212720

Co-occurrence of related asexual, but not sexual, lineages suggests that reproductive interference limits coexistence.

Jeannette Whitton1, Christopher J Sears2, Wayne P Maddison2,3.   

Abstract

We used randomizations to analyse patterns of co-occurrence of sexual and apomictic (asexual) members of the North American Crepis agamic complex (Asteraceae). We expect strong asymmetry in reproductive interactions in Crepis: apomicts produce clonal seeds with no need for pollination and are not subject to reproductive interference from co-occurring relatives. However, because they still produce some viable pollen, apomicts can reduce reproductive success of nearby sexual relatives, potentially leading to eventual local exclusion of sexuals. Consistent with this, randomizations reveal that sexuals are over-represented in isolated sites, while apomicts freely co-occur. Incorporation of taxonomic and phylogenetic evidence indicates that this pattern is not driven by local origins of asexuals. Our evidence that patterns of local co-occurrence are structured by reproductive interference suggests an underappreciated role for these interactions in community assembly, and highlights the need for explicit tests of the relative contributions of ecological and reproductive interactions in generating patterns of limiting similarity.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Keywords:  apomixis; asymmetric gene flow; competitive exclusion; limiting similarity; reproductive exclusion; reproductive interference

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29212720      PMCID: PMC5740271          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

1.  Crosses between sexual and apomictic dandelions (Taraxacum). I. The inheritance of apomixis.

Authors:  I C Tas; P J Van Dijk
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Chloroplast DNA footprints of postglacial recolonization by oaks.

Authors:  R J Petit; E Pineau; B Demesure; R Bacilieri; A Ducousso; A Kremer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coexistence of sexual and asexual conspecifics: a cellular automaton model.

Authors:  Claudia Carrillo; Nicholas F Britton; Michael Mogie
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities.

Authors:  J Cavender-Bares; D D Ackerly; D A Baum; F A Bazzaz
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Patterns of recurrent evolution and geographic parthenogenesis within apomictic polyploid Easter daises (Townsendia hookeri).

Authors:  Stacey Lee Thompson; Jeannette Whitton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Plant-pollinator interactions and the assembly of plant communities.

Authors:  Risa D Sargent; David D Ackerly
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Eco-evolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  F Pelletier; D Garant; A P Hendry
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Diplospory and Parthenogenesis in Sexual x Agamospermous (Apomictic ) Erigeron (Asteraceae) Hybrids.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Plant Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.785

9.  Male sterility in triploid dandelions: asexual females vs. asexual hermaphrodites.

Authors:  P G Meirmans; J C M Den Nijs; P H Van Tienderen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence.

Authors:  Axel Hochkirch; Julia Gröning; Amelie Bücker
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  2 in total

1.  Frequency-dependent fitness and reproductive dynamics contribute to habitat segregation in sympatric jewelflowers.

Authors:  Kyle Christie; Sharon Y Strauss
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Reproductive interference and Satyrisation: mechanisms, outcomes and potential use for insect control.

Authors:  Christina Mitchell; Stewart Leigh; Luke Alphey; Wilfried Haerty; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  J Pest Sci (2004)       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 5.742

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.