Literature DB >> 17584368

Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence.

Axel Hochkirch1, Julia Gröning, Amelie Bücker.   

Abstract

1. As species are often considered discrete natural units, interspecific sexual interactions are often disregarded as potential factors determining community composition. Nevertheless reproductive interference, ranging from signal jamming to hybridization, can have significant costs for species sharing similar signal channels. 2. We combined laboratory and field experiments to test whether the coexistence of two congeneric ground-hopper species with overlapping ranges might be influenced by sexual interactions. 3. In the laboratory experiment the number of conspecific copulations of Tetrix ceperoi decreased substantially in the presence of Tetrix subulata. Males of T. ceperoi performed more mating attempts with heterospecific females, whereas females of T. subulata rejected these heterospecific approaches more often than those of conspecifics. Although no heterospecific matings occurred in the laboratory, the reproductive success of T. ceperoi was reduced substantially in field experiments. Negative effects on T. subulata were found only at high densities. 4. Our results suggest that reproductive interference could have similar consequences as competition, such as demographic displacement of one species ('sexual exclusion'). As reproductive interference should be selected against, it may also drive the evolution of signals (reproductive character displacement) or promote habitat, spatial or temporal segregation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17584368     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01241.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  28 in total

1.  Character displacement and the origins of diversity.

Authors:  David W Pfennig; Karin S Pfennig
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Integrating behaviour and ecology into global biodiversity conservation strategies.

Authors:  Joseph A Tobias; Alex L Pigot
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Co-occurrence of related asexual, but not sexual, lineages suggests that reproductive interference limits coexistence.

Authors:  Jeannette Whitton; Christopher J Sears; Wayne P Maddison
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Reproductive isolation between Stigmaeopsis celarius and its sibling species sympatrically inhabiting bamboo (Pleioblastus spp.) plants.

Authors:  Younghae Chae; Nanako Yokoyama; Katsura Ito; Tatsuya Fukuda; Ryo Arakawa; Yan-Xuan Zhang; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Reproductive interference between Rana dalmatina and Rana temporaria affects reproductive success in natural populations.

Authors:  Attila Hettyey; Balázs Vági; Tibor Kovács; János Ujszegi; Patrik Katona; Márk Szederkényi; Peter B Pearman; Matteo Griggio; Herbert Hoi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Reproductive interference and fecundity affect competitive interactions of sibling species with low mating barriers: experimental and theoretical evidence.

Authors:  M Gebiola; S E Kelly; L Velten; R Zug; P Hammerstein; M Giorgini; M S Hunter
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 7.  Character displacement: ecological and reproductive responses to a common evolutionary problem.

Authors:  Karin S Pfennig; David W Pfennig
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.875

8.  Variation in the strength of reproductive interference from an alien congener to a native species in Taraxacum.

Authors:  Sachiko Nishida; Keisuke Hashimoto; Masahiro M Kanaoka; Ko-Ichi Takakura; Takayoshi Nishida
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Pesticide-mediated displacement of a phytoseiid predator, Neoseiulus womersleyi, by another phytoseiid predator, N. californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  Mohammad Shaef Ullah; Masumi Hanawa; Tetsuo Gotoh
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.132

10.  Do native brown trout and non-native brook trout interact reproductively?

Authors:  J Cucherousset; J C Aymes; N Poulet; F Santoul; R Céréghino
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.