| Literature DB >> 29212459 |
Nataliya G Batina1, Christopher J Crnich2,3, Dörte Döpfer4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nursing home residents are frequently colonized with various strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) but the intra-facility dynamics of strain-specific MRSA remains poorly understood. We aimed at identifying and quantifying the associations between acquisition and carriage of MRSA strains and their potential risk factors in community nursing homes using mathematical modeling.Entities:
Keywords: Acquisition; Colonization; Non-USA300 MRSA; Nursing home; Persistence; Risk factors; USA300 MRSA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29212459 PMCID: PMC5719525 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2837-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Averaged Bayesian network that includes all potential risk factors and events for MRSA clonal groups. The network was built by averaging 1000 networks learned from bootstrap resampling of the data. The averaged network included only significant arcs. T and C followed by a 2-digit sequence indicate acquisition and carriage events for the associated strain, respectively (e.g., T01 and C01 denote acquisition and carriage for USA100, T03 and C03 for USA300). AB, antibiotic use in the previous 3 months (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Hosp, hospitalizations in the previous 3 months (0 = Non-exposed, 0 = Exposed); Dev, invasive device (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Wnd, wound (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Comorb, comorbidities (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe); Func, functional status (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe); Cogn, cognitive status (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe)
Fig. 2Conditional probabilities of carriage of USA100 derived from the Bayesian network depicted in Fig. 1. Conditions that correspond to a probability of 0 are not displayed. The secondary axis shows the total number of observations with respective combinations of risk factors. Pr, estimates of conditional probabilities; # Obs., the total number of observations with respective combinations of risk factors; Comorb, comorbidity (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe); Cogn, cognitive status (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe); Dev, presence of invasive device (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Wnd, presence of wound (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed)
Coefficients derived from MELR and ENET models for strains discriminated at the 80% similarity threshold
| Covariates | Elastic net (ENET) | Mixed effects logistic regression (MELR) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | Estimate (SE)a | Bootstrapped 95% CIa | OR (95% CI)a (odds for Intercept) |
| |
|
| |||||
| (Intercept) | −3.42 | −3.45 (0.29) | (−4.46, −2.89) | 0.03 (0.01, 0.06) | NA |
|
| −5.83 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
|
| 0.09 | 0.58 | (0.00, 1.37) | NA | NA |
|
| |||||
| (Intercept) | −2.53 | −2.10 (0.30) | (−3.04, −1.41) | 0.12 (0.05, 0.24) | NA |
|
| −5.04 | −20.30 (28.36) | (−82.16, −13.96) | 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) | <0.001 |
|
| −0.88 | −0.71 (0.30) | (−2.95, 0.72) | 0.49 (0.05, 2.05) | 0.010 |
|
| 0.37 | 0.31 (0.16) | (−0.11, 1.04) | 1.36 (0.89, 2.84) | NAb |
|
| 0.26 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
|
| 1.11 | 1.02 (0.21) | (0.31, 1.77) | 2.77 (1.37, 5.87) | <0.001 |
|
| 0.15 | 0.66 | (0.16, 0.92) | NA | NA |
|
| |||||
| (Intercept) | −4.83 | −5.64 (0.76) | (−98.09, −4.25) | 0.00 (0.00, 0.01) | NA |
|
| 0.46 | 1.11 (0.59) | (−0.99, 91.84) | 3.03 (0.37, >1000) | 0.047 |
|
| NA | 1.01 | (0.00, 5.55) | NA | NA |
|
| |||||
| (Intercept) | −10.47 | −5.14 (0.73) | (−29.75, −4.01) | 0.01 (0.00, 0.02) | NA |
|
| 0.36 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
|
| 1.15 | 1.34 (0.35) | (−24.83, 2.54) | 3.81 (0.00, 12.70) | <0.001 |
|
| 0.63 | 0.80 (0.34) | (−0.50, 23.66) | 2.23 (0.61, >1000) | 0.018 |
|
| 1.10 | 1.40 (0.36) | (−20.04, 2.34) | 4.06 (0.00, 10.40) | <0.001 |
|
| 5.92 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
|
| −0.43 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
|
| 0.14 | 1.48 | (0.32, 3.23) | NA | NA |
|
| |||||
| (Intercept)c | −7.40 | −7.15 (1.35)/−34.55 (95.6) | (−783.01, −5.29)/(−715.76, −26.84) | 0.00 (0.00, 0.01)/ | NA |
|
| 2.33 | 2.41 (0.88) | (−447.79, 772.85) | 11.16 (0.00, >1000) | 0.005 |
|
| 1.95 | 28.59 (95.60) | (21.23, 704.66) | >1000 (>1000, >1000) | 0.003 |
|
| −0.06 | 1.30/1.75 | (0.00, 6.81) / | NA | NA |
Covariates of each outcome variable (strain-specific acquisition or carriage events) represent Markov blankets of these variables. Covariates that were included in the Markov blankets of the outcome but not selected by the ENET or not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level in the MLER models are denoted by NA. The values in the OR and p-value columns that correspond to random effects terms of MELR models and the p-values for intercept terms are also denoted by NA’s. The p-values were obtained from the likelihood ratio test comparing two nested models, with and without the respective term
Logistic regression coefficients of the fixed effects terms (potential risk factor terms and acquisition and carriage of MRSA) are provided for level 1 (reference level is 0). Facility was used as a covariate in ENET models, and its coefficient is provided in the corresponding column. Standard deviations of random intercepts are provided in the columns that correspond to MELR
aMELR estimates and standard errors were derived from fitting the models to the data. Bootstrapped 95% CI’s are percentile CI’s obtained from multilevel bootstrapping with 5000 replications. OR’s are exponentiated model estimates, and respective 95% CI’s are exponentiated bootstrapped 95% CI’s
bUnable to estimate the p-value from the likelihood ratio test comparing two nested models because the model without the term does not converge
cThe model with both Cogn and Comorb included did not converge. Two simpler models, each including one of the terms, were fitted. The first entry in the (Intercept) and Facility columns represent the values from the model with Cogn, and the second entry, separated by “/”, represent the values from the model with Comorb
T01, acquisition of non-USA300; C01, carriage of non-USA300; T03, acquisition of USA300; C03, carriage of USA300; C12, carriage of USA1200;
AB, antibiotic use in the past 3 months (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Hosp, hospitalizations in the past 3 months (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Dev, presence of invasive device (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Wnd, presence of wound (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Comorb, comorbidity (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe); Func, functional status (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe); Cogn, cognitive status (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe);
OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, SE Standard error
Fig. 3Averaged Bayesian network of potential risk factors and strain-specific acquisition and carriage events. The network was built by averaging 1000 networks learned from bootstrap resampling of the data. The averaged network included only significant arcs. T and C followed by a 4-digit sequence indicate acquisition and carriage events for the associated strains discriminated at the 95% similarity threshold, respectively. AB, antibiotic use in the previous 3 months (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Hosp, hospitalizations in the previous 3 months (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Dev, invasive device (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Wnd, wound (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Comorb, comorbidities (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe); Func, functional status (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe); Cogn, cognitive status (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe)
Coefficients of ENET models for strains discriminated at the 95% strain similarity threshold
| Covariates (strain-specific events) | Estimated coefficients associated with the outcome variables (candidate risk factors) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| (Intercept) | −0.56 | −1.69 | −2.25 | −2.30 | −0.39 | 0.75 | −1.39 |
|
| 0.68 | 0.38 | 0.69 | – | 0.50 | 0.69 | – |
|
| – | −1.65 | – | NA | – | – | 1.10 |
|
| 1.17 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| NA | – | – | – | −1.75 | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | −0.68 | 1.12 | – |
|
| 0.99 | 1.45 | – | 3.34 | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | 0.06 | 1.43 | – | 3.47 | −4.40 |
|
| NA | – | – | 1.25 | – | – | – |
|
| 0.96 | NA | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | 0.61 | – | 1.65 | – | – |
|
| – | – | 1.94 | – | 2.71 | 3.08 | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | 2.55 | – | – |
|
| – | −1.56 | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | 0.17 | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | 1.09 | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | 1.49 | – | −1.13 | – |
|
| – | – | 2.05 | – | 1.48 | – | – |
|
| −0.54 | – | – | – | 2.91 | −2.29 | – |
|
| – | – | NA | – | – | – | – |
|
| 0.55 | – | 1.19 | 0.52 | 0.78 | 3.70 | 0.97 |
|
| 0.54 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | 1.20 | 1.95 | – | 3.15 | 1.53 |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | 2.99 | – |
|
| −1.28 | – | – | – | 2.85 | 2.99 | 6.96 |
|
| 0.09 | NA | NA | NA | 0.13 | 0.03 | −0.15 |
In these models, candidate risk factors served as dependent variables, while strain-specific acquisition and carriage events and Facility were included as independent variables. The rows represent the acquisition and carriage events which were a part of the Markov blanket of at least one potential risk factor. The columns display the estimates of the covariates selected by the models from the Markov blankets of the respective potential risk factors. NA’s denote the strain-specific events included in the Markov blanket of a risk factor but not selected by the model, while dashes signify the events that were not in the Markov blankets of the respective risk factors (e.g., C0104 was in the Markov blanket of AB, but was not selected by the model; T0100 was not in the Markov blanket of AB)
aFacility was included into the models as explanatory variable in addition to Markov blankets of the outcomes
T and C followed by a 4-digit sequence indicate acquisition and carriage events for the associated strain, respectively
AB, antibiotic use in the past 3 months (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Hosp, hospitalizations in the past 3 months (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Dev, presence of invasive device (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Wnd, presence of wound (0 = Non-exposed, 1 = Exposed); Comorb, comorbidity (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe); Func, functional status (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe); Cogn, cognitive status (0 = Non-severe, 1 = Severe)