| Literature DB >> 29211404 |
Gamal A Alsagheer1, Atef Fathi1, Mohamed Sayed Abdel-Kader1, Ahmed M Hasan1, Omar Mohamed1, Osama Mahmoud1, Ahmad Abolyosr1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical outcome and predictors of failure of substitution urethroplasty using either dorsal onlay buccal mucosal (BM) graft or ventral onlay penile skin flap (PS) for anterior urethral stricture ≥ 8cm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2010 and January 2016, 50 patients with anterior urethral stricture ≥ 8 cm were treated at our hospital. The surgical outcome and success rate were assessed. The predictors of failure were analyzed using multivariate analysis. Failure was considered when subsequent urethrotomy or urethroplasty were needed.Entities:
Keywords: Oral Mucosal Absorption; Penis ; Urethral Stricture
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29211404 PMCID: PMC5815547 DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Braz J Urol ISSN: 1677-5538 Impact factor: 1.541
Figure 1Harvesting of inner cheek buccal mucosa graft.
Figure 2Dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft augmentation.
Figure 3Ventral onlay circular penile flap augmentation.
Pre-operative patient's characteristics.
| BM urethroplasty (24 patients) | PS urethroplasty (26 patients) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), Mean (SD) | 44.3 (8.5) | 45.2 (10.5) | 0.7 | |
| BMI (Kg/m2), Mean (SD) | 27.5 (4.5) | 28 (5) | 0.8 | |
| Intraoperative stricture length (cm), Mean(SD) | 11.9 (3.8) | 10.7 (2.6) | 0.2 | |
| Preoperative Qmax (mL/sec) | 6.5 (3.4) | 7 (2.4) | 0.2 | |
| Previous VIU, Patients No. (%) | 11 (45.8) | 10 (38.5) | 0.5 | |
| Number of previous urethrotomies, Mean (SD) | 1.6 (0.8) | 1.4 (0.75) | 0.4 | |
|
| ||||
| Bulbar | 2 (8.3%) | 3 (11.5) | 0.9 | |
| Penile | 5 (20.8%) | 6 (23) | ||
| Bulbo-penile | 17 (70.8) | 17 (65.3) | ||
|
| ||||
| Idiopathic | 5 (20.8) | 6 (23) | 0.7 | |
| Traumatic | 8 (33.3) | 10 (38.5) | ||
| Inflammatory | 11 (45.8) | 10(38.5) | ||
Surgical outcome.
| BM urethroplasty (24 patients) | PS urethroplasty (26 patients) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operative time (min.), Mean (SD) | 199.7 (51.2) | 240.3 (45.6) | 0.00 |
| Follow-up duration (mon.), Mean (SD) | 17.4 (6.6) | 15.7 (7) | 0.3 |
| Qmax, (mL/sec), 6 months, Mean (SD) | 16 (1.9) | 15.4 (2.8) | 0.9 |
| Qmax, (mL/sec), 1 year, Mean (SD) | 15.1 (1.5) | 14.5 (2.7) | 0.3 |
| Stricture recurrence, Patients No. (%) | 7 (30.4%) | 6 (23.1%) | 0.5 |
|
| 7 (30.5%) | 5 (19.2%) | 0.4 |
| Hematoma | 3 (13%) | 2 (7.7%) | |
| Wound infection | 4 (17.5%) | 3 (11.5%) | |
|
| 4 (17.4) | 7 (27) | 0.3 |
| Fistula | 1 (4.3) | 2 (7.6) | |
| Post void dribbling | 3 (13) | 6 (23) | |
| Pseudo-diverticulum | 0 | 2 (7.6) |
Univariate analysis for predictors of failure.
| Success (36 patients) | Failure (13 patients) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), Mean (SD) | 44.2 (10.2) | 47 (6.9) | 0.3 | |
| Stricture length(cm), Mean(SD) | 9.3 (2.5) | 12.6 (4.4) | 0.02 | |
| Preoperative Qmax (mL/sec), Mean (SD) | 7.1 (2.9) | 6.2 (2.3) | 0.1 | |
|
| 0.07 | |||
| Bulbar | 5 (13.9) | 0 | ||
| Penile | 10 (27.8) | 1 (7.7) | ||
| Bulbo-penile | 21 (58.3) | 12 (92.3) | ||
|
| 0.15 | |||
| Idiopathic | 7 (19.4) | 3 (23.1) | ||
| Traumatic | 16 (44.4) | 2 (15.4) | ||
| Inflammatory | 13 (36.1) | 8 (61.5) | ||
| Previous VIU, Patients No. (%) | 12 (33.3 %) | 8 (61.5) | 0.07 | |
| Number of previous urethrotomies, Mean (SD) | 1.3 (0.7) | 1.8 (0.8) | 0.08 | |
| Early complications, Patients No. (%) | 6 (16.7%) | 10 (76.9) | 0.00 | |
Multivariate analysis for predictors of failure.
| OR (95% CI) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stricture length | 1.26 (0.92-1.73) | 0.2 | |
|
| |||
| No | Referent | 0.007 | |
| Yes | 5.1 (1.8-9.1) | ||