Literature DB >> 23759258

Ventral oral mucosal onlay graft urethroplasty in nontraumatic bulbar urethral strictures: surgical technique and multivariable analysis of results in 214 patients.

Guido Barbagli1, Francesco Montorsi, Giorgio Guazzoni, Alessandro Larcher, Nicola Fossati, Salvatore Sansalone, Giuseppe Romano, Nicolòmaria Buffi, Massimo Lazzeri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ventral oral mucosal onlay graft is suggested in proximal bulbar strictures where the thick spongiosum provides excellent support to the graft. Some technical steps used in this technique are currently under debate in the literature.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical steps of this urethroplasty and investigate predictive factors of success using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a descriptive observational retrospective study of 214 patients who underwent urethroplasty for bulbar urethral strictures between May 1999 and November 2010 in a single high-volume center. Study inclusion criteria were patients presenting nontraumatic bulbar urethral strictures ranging from 1.3 cm to 6.8 cm in length. Exclusion criteria were traumatic strictures, panurethral strictures, lichen sclerosus, and failed hypospadias repair. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: The oral graft was placed on the ventral bulbar urethral surface and pushed as proximally as possible using dedicated instruments and surgical techniques. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome measure was the objective result, defined as the absence of stricture recurrence at follow-up. The objective outcome was considered a failure when any postoperative instrumentation was needed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was developed. All tests were two sided with a significance level set at 0.05. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median follow-up was 54 mo. Of the 214 patients, 183 (85.5%) were successful and 31 (14.5%) were failures. The preoperative maximum flow rate (Qmax) was a significant predictor of surgical outcome (odds ratio: 1.352; p = 0.001). Age, length, and type of stenosis, and previous treatment were not significant predictors of surgical outcome (all p > 0.05). The limitation of our survey is the absence of a subjective evaluation or the use of specific tools, such as a questionnaire.
CONCLUSIONS: Ventral oral graft urethroplasty represents a valid option in nontraumatic bulbar strictures. Preoperative Qmax may be predictive of urethroplasty failure.
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bulbar urethra; Multivariable statistical analysis; One-stage urethroplasty; Oral mucosal graft; Urethral stricture

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23759258     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Urethral reconstruction in patients with failed hypospadia repair].

Authors:  D Kröpfl; I Kunz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Bulbar urethral strictures : A trivial urological disease or a surgical challenge?]

Authors:  M Austen; J Breul; S Tritschler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Internal urethrotomy in patients with recurrent urethral stricture after buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty.

Authors:  Clemens M Rosenbaum; Marianne Schmid; Tim A Ludwig; Luis A Kluth; Philip Reiss; Roland Dahlem; Oliver Engel; Felix K-H Chun; Silke Riechardt; Margit Fisch; Sascha A Ahyai
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Repair of sphincter urethral strictures preserving urinary continence: surgical technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Guido Barbagli; Sanjay B Kulkarni; Pankaj M Joshi; Dmitriy Nikolavsky; Francesco Montorsi; Salvatore Sansalone; Carla Loreto; Massimo Lazzeri
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Graft surgery in extensive urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Miroslav L Djordjevic
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  The effect of urethral transection on erectile function after anterior urethroplasty.

Authors:  Trevor Haines; Keith F Rourke
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Reconstruction of Membranous Urethral Strictures.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Reynaldo G Gómez; Dmitriy Nikolavsky
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Patient-reported outcomes for typical single cheek harvesting vs atypical lingual, labial or bilateral cheeks harvesting: a single-center analysis of more than 800 patients.

Authors:  Guido Barbagli; Marco Bandini; Sofia Balò; Francesco Montorsi; Salvatore Sansalone; Mauro De Dominicis; Denis Butnaru; Massimo Lazzeri
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Multi-institutional 1-year bulbar urethroplasty outcomes using a standardized prospective cystoscopic follow-up protocol.

Authors:  Bradley A Erickson; Sean P Elliott; Bryan B Voelzke; Jeremy B Myers; Joshua A Broghammer; Thomas G Smith; Chris D McClung; Nejd F Alsikafi; William O Brant
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  Use of overlapping buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for complex anterior urethral strictures.

Authors:  Steven J Hudak
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.