Literature DB >> 29210109

Xenotransplantation: back to the future?

Raphael P H Meier1, Yannick D Muller2,3, Alexandre Balaphas1, Philippe Morel1, Manuel Pascual3, Jörg D Seebach2, Leo H Buhler1.   

Abstract

The field of xenotransplantation has fluctuated between great optimism and doubts over the last 50 years. The initial clinical attempts were extremely ambitious but faced technical and ethical issues that prompted the research community to go back to preclinical studies. Important players left the field due to perceived xenozoonotic risks and the lack of progress in pig-to-nonhuman-primate transplant models. Initial apparently unsurmountable issues appear now to be possible to overcome due to progress of genetic engineering, allowing the generation of multiple-xenoantigen knockout pigs that express human transgenes and the genomewide inactivation of porcine endogenous retroviruses. These important steps forward were made possible by new genome editing technologies, such as CRISPR/Cas9, allowing researchers to precisely remove or insert genes anywhere in the genome. An additional emerging perspective is the possibility of growing humanized organs in pigs using blastocyst complementation. This article summarizes the current advances in xenotransplantation research in nonhuman primates, and it describes the newly developed genome editing technology tools and interspecific organ generation.
© 2017 Steunstichting ESOT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR Cas/9; TALEN; blastocyst complementation; cell transplantation; genome editing technologies; interspecific organ generation; nonhuman primates; nucleases; safety; transplantation; xenotransplantation; xenozoonosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29210109     DOI: 10.1111/tri.13104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  19 in total

1.  The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature.

Authors:  Nienke de Graeff; Karin R Jongsma; Josephine Johnston; Sarah Hartley; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  A review of pig liver xenotransplantation: Current problems and recent progress.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; Xiao Li; Zhaoxu Yang; Kaishan Tao; Quancheng Wang; Bin Dai; Shibin Qu; Wei Peng; Hong Zhang; David K C Cooper; Kefeng Dou
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.907

3.  Xenotransplantation: Progress Along Paths Uncertain from Models to Application.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Platt; Marilia Cascalho; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-31

4.  The role of human CD46 in early xenoislet engraftment in a dual transplant model.

Authors:  Kannan P Samy; Qimeng Gao; Robert Patrick Davis; Mingqing Song; Zachary W Fitch; Michael S Mulvihill; Andrea L MacDonald; Frank V Leopardi; Tam How; Kyha D Williams; Gayathri R Devi; Bradley H Collins; Xunrong Luo; Allan D Kirk
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 5.  Xenotransplantation: A New Era.

Authors:  Amber N Carrier; Anjali Verma; Muhammad Mohiuddin; Manuel Pascual; Yannick D Muller; Alban Longchamp; Chandra Bhati; Leo H Buhler; Daniel G Maluf; Raphael P H Meier
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 8.786

6.  The potential role of 3D-bioprinting in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Ping Li; Wenjun Zhang; Lester J Smith; David Ayares; David K C Cooper; Burcin Ekser
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 7.  Emerging approaches and technologies in transplantation: the potential game changers.

Authors:  Anil Dangi; Shuangjin Yu; Xunrong Luo
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 11.530

Review 8.  Reduction of the survival time of pig xenotransplants by porcine cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  Joachim Denner
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.099

Review 9.  Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus (PERV) - Molecular Structure and Replication Strategy in the Context of Retroviral Infection Risk of Human Cells.

Authors:  Krzysztof Łopata; Emilia Wojdas; Roman Nowak; Paweł Łopata; Urszula Mazurek
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 10.  How the COVID-19 pandemic may impact public support for clinical xenotransplantation in the United States?

Authors:  Michael F Knoll; David K C Cooper; Rita Bottino
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.