Literature DB >> 29209825

Performance of 4 years of population-based mammography screening for breast cancer combined with ultrasound in Tyrol / Austria.

Sabine Geiger-Gritsch1,2,3, Martin Daniaux4, Wolfgang Buchberger5, Rudolf Knapp6, Willi Oberaigner7,8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systems for the delivery of screening mammography vary among countries and these differences can influence screening effectiveness. We evaluated the performance of organized mammography screening for breast cancer combined with ultrasound in Tyrol / Austria, an approach that differs from many other population-based screening programs.
METHODS: Data on women aged 40-69 years screened in the period from June 2008 to May 2012 were collected within the framework of an organized screening program. A total of 272,555 invitations were sent to the target population living in Tyrol and 176,957 screening examinations were performed. We analyzed the main performance indicators as defined by European Union (EU) guidelines and some important estimates of harms.
RESULTS: The estimated 2‑year participation rate was 56.9%. As ultrasound is implemented as second-line screening procedure, 76.2% of all women screened underwent supplementary ultrasound. In total 2322 women were recalled for further assessment (13.1 per 1000 screens) and 1351 biopsies were performed (7.6 per 1000 screens). The positive predictive value was 28.2% for assessment and 48.5% for biopsies. The cancer detection rate was 3.7 per 1000 screens and the proportion of all stage II+ screen-detected cancers was 35.5%. The interval cancer rate was 0.33 and 0.47 per 1000 screens in the first and second years, respectively. The estimated cumulative risk for a false positive screening result and an unnecessary biopsy for women following the invitation approach was 21.1% and 9.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The performance of our population-based screening approach combining mammography and ultrasound is very favorable and potential harm is kept very low compared to other European mammography screening programs for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasm; Early detection of cancer; Mammography; Screening; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29209825     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-017-1293-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  38 in total

1.  The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up.

Authors:  L Tabár; B Vitak; H H Chen; S W Duffy; M F Yen; C F Chiang; U B Krusemo; T Tot; R A Smith
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review and survey of service screening programmes.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Antonio Ponti; Julietta Patnick; Nieves Ascunce; Sisse Njor; Mireille Broeders; Livia Giordano; Alfonso Frigerio; Sven Törnberg; G Van Hal; P Martens; O Májek; J Danes; M von Euler-Chelpin; A Aasmaa; A Anttila; N Becker; Z Péntek; A Budai; S Mádai; P Fitzpatrick; T Mooney; M Zappa; L Ventura; A Scharpantgen; S Hofvind; P Seroczynski; A Morais; V Rodrigues; M J Bento; J Gomes de Carvalho; C Natal; M Prieto; C Sánchez-Contador Escudero; R Zubizarreta Alberti; S B Fernández Llanes; N Ascunce; M Ederra Sanza; G Sarriugarte Irigoien; D Salas Trejo; J Ibáñez Cabanell; M Wiege; G Ohlsson; S Törnberg; M Korzeniewska; C de Wolf; J Fracheboud; J Patnick; L Lancucki; S Ducarroz; E Suonio
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Quantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammography.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Honor J Passow
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet.

Authors:  Eugenio Paci
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Optimal screening mammography reading volumes; evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme.

Authors:  E Cornford; J Reed; A Murphy; R Bennett; A Evans
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Helene Olsen; Sisse H Njor; Ilse Vejborg; Walter Schwartz; Peter Dalgaard; Maj-Britt Jensen; Ulla Brix Tange; Mogens Blichert-Toft; Fritz Rank; Henning Mouridsen; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-13

7.  Programme sensitivity and effectiveness of mammography service screening in Helsinki, Finland.

Authors:  A Anttila; J Koskela; M Hakama
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 8.  A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Introduction of organised mammography screening in Tyrol: results following first year of complete rollout.

Authors:  Willi Oberaigner; Martin Daniaux; Sabine Geiger-Gritsch; Rudolf Knapp; Uwe Siebert; Wolfgang Buchberger
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  Overall assessment system of combined mammography and ultrasound for breast cancer screening in Japan.

Authors:  Koji Ohnuki; Eriko Tohno; Hiroko Tsunoda; Takayoshi Uematsu; Yasuo Nakajima
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.239

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.