| Literature DB >> 29209345 |
Ali Alqahtani1,2, Jun-Lae Cho1, Ka Ho Wong1, Kong M Li3, Valentina Razmovski-Naumovski1,4,5, George Q Li1.
Abstract
Centella asiatica is one of the popular herbs used for inflammatory and neural conditions. Its differentiation from similar species is currently lacking. The aims of this study were to differentiate the three closely related Centella species using methods based on morphological characters, genetic biodiversity, phytochemical compositions and antioxidant activities. According to the morphological characteristics, the collected samples were identified as three species: C. asiatica, Centella cordifolia and Centella erecta and clustered into three groups based on their morphometric variability. Dendogram constructed on the basis of the intersimple sequence repeats (ISSR) analyses were consistent with the morphological grouping. Centella cordifolia had the highest triterpene glycosides, phenolics and antioxidant capacity, followed by C. asiatica, then C. erecta, therefore, was genetically and chemically closer to C. asiatica, while C. erecta was distinctively different from them. The results confirm the occurrence of the closely related three species of Centella in Australia, and the differentiation among them can be achieved via the combination of morphometric, molecular and phytochemical methods. This first comparative botanical study on Centella species provides a foundation for further systematic study and medicinal development of Centella.Entities:
Keywords: Centella species; DNA fingerprinting; TLC; chemometrics; intersimple sequence repeats (ISSR); morphometrics
Year: 2017 PMID: 29209345 PMCID: PMC5702339 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01980
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
The sample code and collection location of C. asiatica (CA), C. cordifolia (CC) and C. erecta (CE) in Australia.
| CA−1 | New South Wales, Denistone | CC−11 | Tasmania, Cradock | CE−6 | New South Wales, Sydney | |||
| CA−2 | New South Wales, Denistone | CC−15 | Victoria, Mandurang | CE−8 | New South Wales, Kingsgrove | |||
| CA−3 | New South Wales, Sydney Olympic Park | CC−21 | Victoria, Tyabb | CE−9 | Western Australia, Busselton | |||
| CA−4 | New South Wales, Sydney Olympic Park | CC−22 | Victoria, Mount Evelyn | CE−92 | Western Australia, Anniebrook | |||
| CA−5 | New South Wales, Camperdown | CC−23 | Victoria, Wantirna | CE−10 | Western Australia, Busselton | |||
| CA−7 | New South Wales, North Sydney | CC−24 | Victoria, Anglesea | CE−102 | Western Australia, Anniebrook | |||
| CA−13 | Queensland, Mudgeeraba | CC−25 | Victoria, Mount Evelyn | CE−12 | Queensland, Mudgeeraba | |||
| CA−14 | Queensland, Edge Hill | CC−26 | Victoria, Wantirna | CE−20 | New South Wales, Thornton | |||
| CA−16 | New South Wales, Denistone | CE−27 | New South Wales, Sydney | |||||
| CA−17 | New South Wales, Menai | |||||||
| CA−18 | New South Wales, Glenhaven | |||||||
| CA−19 | New South Wales, Dural | |||||||
Code, sequence and specific annealing temperature for each of the 14 selected primers.
| ISSR1 | (AG)8C | 57 |
| ISSR4 | (AC)6T | 56 |
| ISSR5 | (CA)8AY | 57 |
| ISSR6 | (AG)8TC | 56.5 |
| ISSR8 | (CT)8GC | 56.5 |
| ISSR9 | (CA)8AR | 56.5 |
| ISSR12 | (GGAGA)3 | 56 |
| ISSR17 | (TG)8A | 56 |
| ISSR18 | (TC)8C | 57 |
| ISSR24 | (GA)8TC | 57 |
| ISSR25 | (CA)8TA | 56 |
| ISSR26 | (GA)8TT | 56 |
| ISSR27 | (GT)8GA | 57 |
| ISSR29 | (CA)8TC | 57 |
Y = C/G.
R = A/T.
A morphometric dataset was obtained from 16 morphological variables based on the average of three readings from three randomly collected leaves.
| CA-1 | NSW | 1 | 2 | 7.11 | 2.02 | 3.39 | 3 | 2 | 18.2 | 6.9 | 19.24 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| CA-2 | NSW | 1 | 2 | 6.87 | 1.89 | 3.19 | 3 | 2 | 17.1 | 7 | 16.2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| CA-3 | NSW | 1 | 2 | 7.64 | 1.885 | 3.184 | 3 | 2 | 16.19 | 6.9 | 15.62 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| CA-4 | NSW | 1 | 2 | 6.78 | 1.79 | 3.168 | 3 | 2 | 18.43 | 7.1 | 14.3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| CA-5 | NSW | 1 | 2 | 6.792 | 1.994 | 3.165 | 3 | 2 | 15.6 | 5.83 | 12.7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| CE-6 | NSW | 1 | 1 | 31.6 | 4.79 | 6.5 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 7.17 | 24.25 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| CA-7 | NSW | 1 | 2 | 6.88 | 1.88 | 3.2 | 3 | 2 | 17.9 | 6.9 | 14.9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| CE-8 | NSW | 1 | 1 | 33.8 | 4.935 | 6.4 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 7.13 | 25.42 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| CE-9 | WA | 1 | 1 | 30.09 | 3.992 | 5.93 | 2 | 1 | 5.02 | 7.17 | 24.59 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| CE-92 | WA | 1 | 1 | 33.79 | 3.452 | 6.43 | 2 | 1 | 6.13 | 7.17 | 24.09 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| CE-10 | WA | 1 | 1 | 34.24 | 4.927 | 6.786 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7.225 | 23.63 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| CE-102 | WA | 1 | 1 | 33.66 | 4.311 | 5.886 | 2 | 1 | 5.11 | 7.128 | 23.99 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| CC-11 | TAS | 2 | 3 | 15.37 | 3.14 | 4.451 | 1 | 2 | 19.72 | 7.08 | 22.56 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| CE-12 | QLD | 1 | 1 | 42.2 | 5.49 | 7.27 | 3 | 2 | 15.21 | 7.32 | 29.7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| CA-13 | QLD | 1 | 2 | 6.8 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
| CA-14 | QLD | 1 | 2 | 7.2 | 2.1 | 3.41 | 3 | 2 | 18.3 | 7 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| CC-15 | VIC | 2 | 3 | 15.11 | 3.23 | 3.98 | 1 | 2 | 20.4 | 7.2 | 20.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| CA-16 | NSW | 1 | 2 | 6.9 | 2.1 | 3.51 | 3 | 2 | 17.3 | 7.1 | 15.9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| CA-17 | NSW | 1 | 2 | 7.83 | 2.04 | 3.37 | 3 | 2 | 18.44 | 6.93 | 19.38 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| CA-18 | NSW | 1 | 2 | 6.82 | 2.2 | 3.08 | 3 | 2 | 15.89 | 6 | 15.1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| CA-19 | NSW | 1 | 2 | 7.8 | 2 | 3.3 | 3 | 2 | 14.1 | 7.1 | 15.9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
| CE-20 | NSW | 1 | 1 | 22.4 | 4.1 | 4.9 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7.15 | 18 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| CC-21 | VIC | 2 | 3 | 15.32 | 3.5 | 3.78 | 1 | 2 | 20.9 | 7.3 | 19.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| CC-22 | VIC | 2 | 3 | 16.92 | 3.13 | 4.18 | 1 | 2 | 18.9 | 7.0 | 17.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| CC-23 | VIC | 2 | 3 | 15.44 | 3.47 | 4.11 | 1 | 2 | 19.66 | 7.1 | 18.6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| CC-24 | VIC | 2 | 3 | 16.22 | 4.102 | 3.99 | 1 | 2 | 18.8 | 6.9 | 17.76 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| CC-25 | VIC | 2 | 3 | 12.1 | 2.98 | 3.21 | 1 | 2 | 17.8 | 6.98 | 18.9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| CC-26 | VIC | 2 | 3 | 11.9 | 2.73 | 3.82 | 1 | 2 | 18.4 | 7 | 19.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| CE-27 | NSW | 1 | 1 | 32.7 | 4.19 | 6.2 | 3 | 2 | 18.1 | 7.17 | 21.55 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
CL; Color of leaf: 1, Green; 2, Dark green.
TL; Texture of leaf: 1, surface and hard texture: 2, Rough surface and soft texture; 3, Rough surface and hard texture.
LSA; Leaf surface area; cm.
LBL; Leaf blade length–diameter from apex tip to leaf base (Sinus point); cm.
LBW; Leaf blade width–diameter across the leaf base (Sinus point); cm.
LBS; Leaf blade shape: 1, Cordate; 2, Orbicular; 3, Reniform.
LMS; Leaf margin shape: 1, Entire with little dentate; 2, Dentate.
NDC; Number of dentate or crenate.
NPV; Number of primary lateral veins.
LP; Length of leaf petiole.
CBP; Color of the bottom part of leaf petiole: 1, Pink; 2, White; 3, Green.
AH; Amount of hair on leaf margins and petiole: 1, High; 2, Medium; 3, Low.
CF; Color of flower: 1, Red to purple; 2, White to Light Pink.
SS; Thickness of the stem: 1, Thick; 2, Thin.
TS; Texture of the stem: 1, Hard; 2, Soft.
CS; Color of the stem: 1, Reddish to Pink; 2, Pink to dark brown; 3, Brown to green.
Figure 1Cultivation of three Centella species. (A) C. asiatica; (B) C. cordifolia; and (C) C. erecta.
Figure 2PCA multivariate analysis of morphometrics grouping the 29 Centella plant samples according to their morphological characters. Clusters with blue, green, and red circles represent CA, C. asiatica; CC, C. cordifolia; and CE, C. erecta; respectively.
Figure 3UPGMA dendogram based on Nei's genetic distances among the populations of three Centella species. CA, C. asiatica; CC, C. cordifolia; and CE, C. erecta.
Figure 4The correlation between ISSR genetic diversity and morphological trait of Centella samples as revealed from Mantel's-test (p < 0.01), two-tailed test.
Figure 5PCA scores plot of processed TLC data matrix of saponins and phenolic profiles of Centella species. Saponins (A) and phenolics (B) PCA clustering of three Centella species (C. asiatica: blue, C. cordifolia: green and C. erecta: red.
Figure 6Variability of TPC (A) and TSC (B) between the three Centella species. CA, C. asiatica; CC, C. cordifolia; and CE, C. erecta. TPC data presented as milligram catechin equivalents per gram of dried weight (mg CAE/g DW). TSC data expressed as percentage saponins equivalents per gram of dried weight (% w/w). The error bar was calculated from SD. Tukey method, ANOVA *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 7HPLC–PDA chromatograms of methanolic extracts of Centella species. Three selected samples representing C. cordifolia (CC21: green), C. asiatica (CA7: blue), C. erecta (CE10: red) at 240 nm. 1, chlorogenic acid; 2, madecassoside, 3, asiaticoside, 4, kaempferol, 5, madecassic acid; 6, asiatic acid.
Figure 8Variations in triterpene compounds and phenolics between Centella species. Triterpene glycosides (MS, madecassoside and AS, asiaticoside) and aglycones (MA, madecassic acid and AA, asiatic acid); CA, chlorogenic acid; and KF, kaempferol; content vary among the three Centella species by HPLC-PDA; CA, C. asiatica; CC, C. cordifolia; and CE, C. erecta. Data presented as mg/g of the dry weight (DW) with error bar calculated SD. Tukey method, ANOVA *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 9Variations in antioxidant capacity of the three Centella species. CA, C. asiatica; CC, C. cardiofolia; and CE, C. erecta. DPPH (A) and ABTS (B) data were expressed as micromole Trolox equivalents per gram of dried weight (μM TE/g DW). CUPRAC (C) data are presented as micromole gallic acid equivalents per gram of dried weight ((μM GAE/g DW). The error bar was calculated from SD. Tukey method, ANOVA *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.