| Literature DB >> 29207852 |
Brian H Lang1, Arnold L H Wu1.
Abstract
High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a promising form of thermal ablation of benign thyroid nodules, but evidence supporting its use is scarce. The present review evaluated the efficacy and safety of single-session HIFU treatment of benign thyroid nodules. As reported in the literature, the extent of nodule shrinkage following treatment ranged from 48.8% to 68.8%. Like other forms of ablation, the shrinkage rate was greatest in the first 3-6 months, and the best responders were patients with small (≤10 mL) nodules. Complications were uncommon, but temporary vocal cord palsy occurred in 3%-4% of patients, and was related to the distance between the HIFU beam and the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Despite being safe and efficacious, a larger-scale prospective trial is required.Entities:
Keywords: Ablation techniques; Goiter, nodular; High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation; Hyperthermia, induced; Ultrasonography, interventional
Year: 2017 PMID: 29207852 PMCID: PMC5885474 DOI: 10.14366/usg.17057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultrasonography ISSN: 2288-5919
A comparison of inclusion and exclusion criteria for HIFU ablation of benign thyroid nodules
| Study | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Esnault et al. (2011) [ | At least 2 thyroid nodules, with 1 needing surgery | Suspicion of malignancy nodule, neck irradiation, previous surgery, or previous radioactive iodine treatment |
| Nodule targeted for HIFU located at least 3 mm from the trachea, esophagus, recurrent laryngeal nerve, carotid artery, and skin | Any cystic components ≥20% or any large calcifications | |
| The nodule selected for HIFU treatment was different | Patient unable to maintain a stable position with | |
| from the one indicated for surgery. | hyperextended neck | |
| Korkusuz et al. (2015) [ | Over 18 years old | Malignant nodules |
| At least 1 benign nodule causing neck pain, hoarseness, swallowing disorders, discomfort, cosmetic concerns, or thyrotoxicosis | Target nodules too close to the trachea or carotid arteries | |
| Refusing surgery or radioactive iodine treatment | Patients with a contraindication for HIFU (recurrent nerve anomalies or target volume) | |
| Kovatcheva et al. (2015) [ | Over 18 years old | Head and/or neck disease preventing hyperextension of the neck |
| Presence of 1 or more non-malignant thyroid nodules | History of thyroid cancer or other malignant tumors in the neck region | |
| Nodule measuring greater than or equal to 10 mm in 3 orthogonal dimensions on ultrasonography | History of neck irradiation | |
| <30% of the targeted nodule comprising a cystic area | Intranodular macrocalcifications precluding treatment with HIFU | |
| Nodule considered accessible for HIFU | Nodules next to the posterior margin of the thyroid lobe with an anteroposterior diameter less than 15 mm | |
| Normal TSH level | Pregnancy/lactation | |
| No vocal cord immobility on laryngoscopy | Any contraindications related to moderate intravenous sedation | |
| Lang et al. (2017) [ | Benign cytology and a sonographic pattern with low to very low suspicion | Age ≤18 years old |
| Nodule causing pressure symptoms | Pregnancy or lactation | |
| All 3 dimensions between 10 and 40 mm | Indeterminate or malignant nodules | |
| Nodule ≥70% solidity | Intranodular macrocalcifications | |
| Nodule within 5-30 mm from the skin | History of head and neck irradiation | |
| Normal thyroid function and calcitonin levels | History of non-medullary thyroid carcinoma | |
| Pre-existing vocal cord palsy |
HIFU, high-intensity focused ultrasound; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.
Fig. 1.A treatment image captured immediately after an 8-second treatment pulse.
The central panel represents the bird-eye view reconstruction of the nodule. The empty circles represent the non-ablated subunits, while the filled circles represent the ablated subunits. The presence of hyperechoic marks (microbubbles) at the focal point of the high-intensity focused ultrasound beams in the treatment screen should also be noted.
A comparison of pre-ablation nodule volume and treatment efficacy following single-session HIFU ablation
| Study | No. of nodules treated | Pre-ablation volume (mL) | Efficacy (% reduction from baseline) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esnault et al. (2011) [ | 22 | Range 0.5-2.6 | Nodules surgically resected and examined histologically after 2 wk |
| Korkusuz et al. (2015) [ | 9 | Median, 3.5 (0.8-7.7) | Median, 48.8 (11.4-75.0) at 3 mo |
| Kovatcheva et al. (2015) [ | 20 | Mean±SD, 4.96±2.79 (1.56-9.35) | Mean±SD, 48.7±24.3 at 6 mo (after single ablation) |
| Lang et al. (2017) [ | 22 | Mean±SD, 6.98±4.04 (1.68-16.76) | Mean±SD, 68.87±15.27 at 12 mo (following single ablation) |
| Lang et al. (2017) [ | 73 | Range 0.6-39.2 | Median±SD, 68.3 (22.77-96.5) at 6 mo (following single ablation) |
HIFU, high-intensity focused ultrasound.
Fig. 2.A 37-year-old woman complaining of a growing right thyroid swelling.
A-C. Sagittal ultrasonography of a right solid thyroid nodule obtained before treatment (A) and 3 months (B) and 6 months (C) after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment are shown. The extent of nodule shrinkage and the echogenic change (from isoechoic to hypoechoic) after treatment should be noted.