Literature DB >> 29205671

Fronto-parietal coding of goal-directed actions performed by artificial agents.

Aleksandra Kupferberg1, Marco Iacoboni2, Virginia Flanagin3,4, Markus Huber4, Anna Kasparbauer5, Thomas Baumgartner6, Gregor Hasler1, Florian Schmidt7, Christoph Borst7, Stefan Glasauer3,4.   

Abstract

With advances in technology, artificial agents such as humanoid robots will soon become a part of our daily lives. For safe and intuitive collaboration, it is important to understand the goals behind their motor actions. In humans, this process is mediated by changes in activity in fronto-parietal brain areas. The extent to which these areas are activated when observing artificial agents indicates the naturalness and easiness of interaction. Previous studies indicated that fronto-parietal activity does not depend on whether the agent is human or artificial. However, it is unknown whether this activity is modulated by observing grasping (self-related action) and pointing actions (other-related action) performed by an artificial agent depending on the action goal. Therefore, we designed an experiment in which subjects observed human and artificial agents perform pointing and grasping actions aimed at two different object categories suggesting different goals. We found a signal increase in the bilateral inferior parietal lobule and the premotor cortex when tool versus food items were pointed to or grasped by both agents, probably reflecting the association of hand actions with the functional use of tools. Our results show that goal attribution engages the fronto-parietal network not only for observing a human but also a robotic agent for both self-related and social actions. The debriefing after the experiment has shown that actions of human-like artificial agents can be perceived as being goal-directed. Therefore, humans will be able to interact with service robots intuitively in various domains such as education, healthcare, public service, and entertainment.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29205671      PMCID: PMC6866499          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  78 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas.

Authors:  Laurie Carr; Marco Iacoboni; Marie-Charlotte Dubeau; John C Mazziotta; Gian Luigi Lenzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields.

Authors:  Justin R Chumbley; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Ventral premotor and inferior parietal cortices make distinct contribution to action organization and intention understanding.

Authors:  Luca Bonini; Stefano Rozzi; Francesca Ugolotti Serventi; Luciano Simone; Pier F Ferrari; Leonardo Fogassi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  When do we simulate non-human agents? Dissociating communicative and non-communicative actions.

Authors:  Roman Liepelt; Wolfgang Prinz; Marcel Brass
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-03-30

5.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. I. Somatotopy and the control of proximal movements.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; L Fogassi; G Luppino; M Matelli; R Camarda; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping.

Authors:  Scott H Frey; Deborah Vinton; Roger Norlund; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-22

7.  Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach.

Authors:  A L Woodward
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-11

8.  Different impressions of other agents obtained through social interaction uniquely modulate dorsal and ventral pathway activities in the social human brain.

Authors:  Hideyuki Takahashi; Kazunori Terada; Tomoyo Morita; Shinsuke Suzuki; Tomoki Haji; Hideki Kozima; Masahiro Yoshikawa; Yoshio Matsumoto; Takashi Omori; Minoru Asada; Eiichi Naito
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Modulation of the action control system by social intention: unexpected social requests override preplanned action.

Authors:  Luisa Sartori; Cristina Becchio; Maria Bulgheroni; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Does tool-related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp?

Authors:  Kenneth F Valyear; Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi; Amanda J Stiglick; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  2 in total

1.  Fronto-parietal coding of goal-directed actions performed by artificial agents.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kupferberg; Marco Iacoboni; Virginia Flanagin; Markus Huber; Anna Kasparbauer; Thomas Baumgartner; Gregor Hasler; Florian Schmidt; Christoph Borst; Stefan Glasauer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Human but not robotic gaze facilitates action prediction.

Authors:  Emmanuele Tidoni; Henning Holle; Michele Scandola; Igor Schindler; Loron Hill; Emily S Cross
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-05-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.