Melissa A Jim1, Paulo S Pinheiro2, Helena Carreira3, David K Espey4, Charles L Wiggins5, Hannah K Weir1. 1. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada. 3. Cancer Survival Group, Department of Noncommunicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 4. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 5. New Mexico Tumor Registry, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stomach cancer was a leading cause of cancer-related deaths early in the 20th century and has steadily declined over the last century in the United States. Although incidence and death rates are now low, stomach cancer remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in black, Asian and Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native populations. METHODS: Data from the CONCORD-2 study were used to analyze stomach cancer survival among males and females aged 15 to 99 years who were diagnosed in 37 states covering 80% of the US population. Survival analyses were corrected for background mortality using state-specific and race-specific (white and black) life tables and age-standardized using the International Cancer Survival Standard weights. Net survival is presented up to 5 years after diagnosis by race (all, black, and white) for 2001 through 2003 and 2004 through 2009 to account for changes in collecting Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Summary Stage 2000 data from 2004. RESULTS: Almost one-third of stomach cancers were diagnosed at a distant stage among both whites and blacks. Age-standardized 5-year net survival increased between 2001 to 2003 and 2004 to 2009 (26.1% and 29%, respectively), and no differences were observed by race. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival estimates were 53.1%, 33.8%, and 29%, respectively. Survival improved in most states. Survival by stage was 64% (local), 28.2% (regional), and 5.3% (distant). CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicate high fatality for stomach cancer, especially soon after diagnosis. Although improvements in stomach cancer survival were observed, survival remained relatively low for both blacks and whites. Primary prevention through the control of well-established risk factors would be expected to have the greatest impact on further reducing deaths from stomach cancer. Cancer 2017;123:4994-5013. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND:Stomach cancer was a leading cause of cancer-related deaths early in the 20th century and has steadily declined over the last century in the United States. Although incidence and death rates are now low, stomach cancer remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in black, Asian and Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native populations. METHODS: Data from the CONCORD-2 study were used to analyze stomach cancer survival among males and females aged 15 to 99 years who were diagnosed in 37 states covering 80% of the US population. Survival analyses were corrected for background mortality using state-specific and race-specific (white and black) life tables and age-standardized using the International Cancer Survival Standard weights. Net survival is presented up to 5 years after diagnosis by race (all, black, and white) for 2001 through 2003 and 2004 through 2009 to account for changes in collecting Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Summary Stage 2000 data from 2004. RESULTS: Almost one-third of stomach cancers were diagnosed at a distant stage among both whites and blacks. Age-standardized 5-year net survival increased between 2001 to 2003 and 2004 to 2009 (26.1% and 29%, respectively), and no differences were observed by race. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival estimates were 53.1%, 33.8%, and 29%, respectively. Survival improved in most states. Survival by stage was 64% (local), 28.2% (regional), and 5.3% (distant). CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicate high fatality for stomach cancer, especially soon after diagnosis. Although improvements in stomach cancer survival were observed, survival remained relatively low for both blacks and whites. Primary prevention through the control of well-established risk factors would be expected to have the greatest impact on further reducing deaths from stomach cancer. Cancer 2017;123:4994-5013. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
CONCORD study; Epidemiology; National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR); Surveillance; and End Results (SEER); cancer registries; gastric cancer; population-based cancer survival; stomach cancer
Authors: Claudia Allemani; Rhea Harewood; Christopher J Johnson; Helena Carreira; Devon Spika; Audrey Bonaventure; Kevin Ward; Hannah K Weir; Michel P Coleman Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Claudia Allemani; Hannah K Weir; Helena Carreira; Rhea Harewood; Devon Spika; Xiao-Si Wang; Finian Bannon; Jane V Ahn; Christopher J Johnson; Audrey Bonaventure; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Charles Stiller; Gulnar Azevedo e Silva; Wan-Qing Chen; Olufemi J Ogunbiyi; Bernard Rachet; Matthew J Soeberg; Hui You; Tomohiro Matsuda; Magdalena Bielska-Lasota; Hans Storm; Thomas C Tucker; Michel P Coleman Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Phyllis A Wingo; Cheryll J Cardinez; Sarah H Landis; Robert T Greenlee; Lynn A G Ries; Robert N Anderson; Michael J Thun Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Hongyu Wu; Jennifer A Rusiecki; Kangmin Zhu; John Potter; Susan S Devesa Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Michel P Coleman; Manuela Quaresma; Franco Berrino; Jean-Michel Lutz; Roberta De Angelis; Riccardo Capocaccia; Paolo Baili; Bernard Rachet; Gemma Gatta; Timo Hakulinen; Andrea Micheli; Milena Sant; Hannah K Weir; J Mark Elwood; Hideaki Tsukuma; Sergio Koifman; Gulnar Azevedo E Silva; Silvia Francisci; Mariano Santaquilani; Arduino Verdecchia; Hans H Storm; John L Young Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Claudia Allemani; Rhea Harewood; Christopher J Johnson; Helena Carreira; Devon Spika; Audrey Bonaventure; Kevin Ward; Hannah K Weir; Michel P Coleman Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Thomas B Richards; S Jane Henley; Mary C Puckett; Hannah K Weir; Bin Huang; Thomas C Tucker; Claudia Allemani Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Shria Kumar; Christina M Dudzik; Mallory Reed; Jessica M Long; Kirk J Wangensteen; Bryson W Katona Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2020-08-28
Authors: Natalie Liu; Yiwei Xu; Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Daniel E Abbott; Sharon M Weber; Anne O Lidor Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Allison N Martin; Allison Silverstein; Robinson Ssebuufu; Joseph Lule; Pacifique Mugenzi; Alexandra Fehr; Tharcisse Mpunga; Lawrence N Shulman; Paul H Park; Ainhoa Costas-Chavarri Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Katrin Jensen; Svenja Seide; Meinhard Kieser; Matthias Schwarzbach; Tracy E Slanger; Bryan Burmeister; David Kelsen; Donna Niedzwiecki; Guillaume Piessen; Christoph Schuhmacher; Susan Urba; Cornelis van de Velde; Marc Ychou; Ralf Hofheinz; Sylvie Lorenzen Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 9.162