Literature DB >> 33151441

Contribution of chemotherapy to improved prognosis in stage 4 gastric cancer: trend analysis of a regional population-based cancer registry in Japan.

Tomomi Nakao1,2, Rena Kaneko3,4, Hirokazu Tanaka5,6, Shunsuke Kobayashi1,2, Risa Omori1, Yuichiro Yano1, Kentaro Kamada1, Takashi Ikehara1,2, Yuzuru Sato1, Yoshinori Igarashi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about time trends in the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC), since the introduction of new chemotherapeutic agents. This study aimed to analyze how the increased number of available chemotherapeutic options affected the prognosis of GC and which patient types benefited within in a large population.
METHODS: From a population-based cancer registry in Japan, 35,751 cases of GC were identified. Of these, 8214 cases were stage 4. The time trend for 3-year survival in stage 4 GC according to patient characteristics (age and tumor location) was estimated in relation to the introduction of new anticancer drugs. Multiple imputation was performed for sensitivity analysis to strengthen the missing data. In addition, we estimated the 5-year survival rate for distal-GC (DGC) and proximal-GC (PGC), and the hazard ratio (HR) was estimated by Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS: Improvement of overall survival was accelerated in stage 4 cases over time. The prognosis was improved from 11.4% to 13.2%, subsequent to the approval of several oncologic drugs since 2009. Younger patients were more likely to have improved survival rates in response to the increase in chemotherapy options (< 60-year-old, 5.4%: 60-70, 2.2%; 70-80, 0.3%) from 2007 to 2015. The HR for DGC vs. PGC was 1.11 (95% CI 1.08-1.15), and PGC showed a higher rate of improved outcomes (2.4% vs. 0.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed that improvement in the GC survival rate was accelerated by the introduction of new chemotherapeutic strategies and it was most evident among younger patients and in patients with PGC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Prognosis; Survival rate; Trend analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33151441     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01820-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  28 in total

1.  Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (ABSOLUTE): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Kohei Shitara; Atsuo Takashima; Kazumasa Fujitani; Keisuke Koeda; Hiroki Hara; Norisuke Nakayama; Shuichi Hironaka; Kazuhiro Nishikawa; Yoichi Makari; Kenji Amagai; Shinya Ueda; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Hideki Shimodaira; Tomohiro Nishina; Masahiro Tsuda; Yukinori Kurokawa; Takao Tamura; Yasutsuna Sasaki; Satoshi Morita; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-01-19

2.  There's many a slip.

Authors:  E L Gooding
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1982 Mar 24-30

3.  Gastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan.

Authors:  Toshifusa Nakajima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial.

Authors:  Wasaburo Koizumi; Hiroyuki Narahara; Takuo Hara; Akinori Takagane; Toshikazu Akiya; Masakazu Takagi; Kosei Miyashita; Takashi Nishizaki; Osamu Kobayashi; Wataru Takiyama; Yasushi Toh; Takashi Nagaie; Seiichi Takagi; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Kimihiko Yanaoka; Hiroyuki Orita; Masahiro Takeuchi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Survival of Patients with Stomach Cancer and its Determinants in Kurdistan.

Authors:  Ghobad Moradi; Kohsar Karimi; Nader Esmailnasab; Daem Roshani
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016

6.  Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

Authors:  David Cunningham; Naureen Starling; Sheela Rao; Timothy Iveson; Marianne Nicolson; Fareeda Coxon; Gary Middleton; Francis Daniel; Jacqueline Oates; Andrew Richard Norman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Hansjochen Wilke; Kei Muro; Eric Van Cutsem; Sang-Cheul Oh; György Bodoky; Yasuhiro Shimada; Shuichi Hironaka; Naotoshi Sugimoto; Oleg Lipatov; Tae-You Kim; David Cunningham; Philippe Rougier; Yoshito Komatsu; Jaffer Ajani; Michael Emig; Roberto Carlesi; David Ferry; Kumari Chandrawansa; Jonathan D Schwartz; Atsushi Ohtsu
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Screening for gastric cancer in Asia: current evidence and practice.

Authors:  Wai K Leung; Ming-shiang Wu; Yasuo Kakugawa; Jae J Kim; Khay-guan Yeoh; Khean Lee Goh; Kai-chun Wu; Deng-chyang Wu; Jose Sollano; Udom Kachintorn; Takuji Gotoda; Jaw-town Lin; Wei-cheng You; Enders K W Ng; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zheyu Song; Yuanyu Wu; Jiebing Yang; Dingquan Yang; Xuedong Fang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2017-07

10.  Trend analysis of major cancer statistics according to sex and severity levels in Korea.

Authors:  Minsu Ock; Woong Jae Choi; Min-Woo Jo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018.

Authors:  Izuma Nakayama; Daisuke Takahari; Keitaro Shimozaki; Keisho Chin; Takeru Wakatsuki; Mariko Ogura; Akira Ooki; Daisaku Kamiimabeppu; Hiroki Osumi; Eiji Shinozaki; Kensei Yamaguchi
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.837

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.