Literature DB >> 29203973

Long-Term Functional and Oncological Outcomes Following Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancers.

Sivakumar Mahalingam1, Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri1, Surendran Veeraiah2.   

Abstract

Surgery for low rectal cancer often involves a permanent stoma. Intersphincteric resection (ISR) with colo-anal anastomosis is a valuable sphincter sparing surgical procedure that avoids the need for permanent stoma in patients with low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term functional and oncological outcomes following ISR. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with low rectal cancer who underwent ISR with colo-anal anastomosis in our institution between 2007 and 2015. All patients had a diversion stoma. Bowel function outcomes were assessed prospectively using Wexner incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS), and the Cancer Institute Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire. The histological reports were reviewed to assess the oncological adequacy of the surgery. Patterns of recurrence and survival were analyzed in this group of patients. Thirty-three patients who underwent an ISR were eligible for this study. Laparoscopic resection was performed in five patients. All the patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation except the two who received short course radiation and one who did not receive any neoadjuvant treatment. The median distance from the anal verge to the distal edge of the tumor was 3 cm (range 1.5-5 cm). Distal resection margins and circumferential resection margins were negative in all the patients. The 30-day post-operative mortality rate was 3.03%. In 20 patients with a median follow-up of 48 months, the 3-year overall survival was 95%. One patient had recurrence in the para-aortic nodes. No patient had a local recurrence. Bowel function was assessed in 18 patients who had a minimum stoma free period of 1 year. After a median of 43 months following stoma closure, the median Wexner score was 3.56 (range 0-19), median LARS score was 4.78 (range 0-33), and the mean Cancer Institute QoL score was 151.56 ± 15.741. The QoL was average to very high with an overall acceptable quality of life. In this study, ISR was associated with acceptable long-term functional and oncological outcomes. It can be considered as a safe alternative to a permanent stoma in selected patients with low rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intersphincteric resection; Low rectal cancer; Neoadjuvant chemoradiation; Outcome; Sphincter sparing surgery

Year:  2016        PMID: 29203973      PMCID: PMC5705496          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-016-0571-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  23 in total

1.  Effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on anal sphincter functions and quality of life in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Aras Emre Canda; Cem Terzi; Ilknur B Gorken; Ilhan Oztop; Selman Sokmen; Mehmet Fuzun
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Validation of cancer institute quality of life questionnaire version II for cancer patients in India.

Authors:  E Vidhubala; R Ravikannan; C S Mani; R Muthuvel; V Surendren; F U John Paul
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.224

4.  Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Katrine J Emmertsen; Søren Laurberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and its influence on quality of life.

Authors:  G Barisic; V Markovic; M Popovic; I Dimitrijevic; P Gavrilovic; Z Krivokapic
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.

Authors:  Jeonghyun Kang; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience.

Authors:  Norio Saito; Yoshihiro Moriya; Kazuo Shirouzu; Koutarou Maeda; Hidetaka Mochizuki; Keiji Koda; Takashi Hirai; Masanori Sugito; Masaaki Ito; Akihiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Long-term survival and recurrence outcomes following surgery for distal rectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric J Silberfein; Kiran M Kattepogu; Chung-Yuan Hu; John M Skibber; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Barry Feig; Prajnan Das; Sunil Krishnan; Christopher Crane; Scott Kopetz; Cathy Eng; George J Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jutta Engel; Jacqueline Kerr; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Renate Eckel; Hansjörg Sauer; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Reza Chamlou; Yann Parc; Tabassome Simon; Malika Bennis; Nidal Dehni; Rolland Parc; Emmanuel Tiret
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Latest Advances in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yifan Xv; Jiajun Fan; Yuan Ding; Yang Hu; Yingjie Hu; Zhengjie Jiang; Qingsong Tao
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 2.  Nutritional Treatment of Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Agata Lewandowska; Urszula Religioni; Aleksandra Czerw; Andrzej Deptała; Beata Karakiewicz; Olga Partyka; Monika Pajewska; Katarzyna Sygit; Elżbieta Cipora; Kamila Kmieć; Anna Augustynowicz; Dominika Mękal; Michał Waszkiewicz; Agnieszka Barańska; Daniela Mináriková; Peter Minárik; Piotr Merks
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  The effect of biofeedback training on intestinal function among patients with middle and low rectal cancer: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Li Liu; Xiaodan Wu; Qianwen Liu; Caixing Tang; Baojia Luo; Yujing Fang; Zhizhong Pan; Desen Wan; Meichun Zheng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

Review 4.  Critical and Challenging Issues in the Surgical Management of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Aeris Jane D Nacion; Youn Young Park; Seung Yoon Yang; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  A quest for sphincter-saving surgery in ultralow rectal tumours-a single-centre cohort study.

Authors:  Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Piotr Zarzycki; Agata Czerwińska; Michał Wysocki; Natalia Gajewska; Grzegorz Torbicz; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 6.  Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi; Seon Hahn Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2021-11-17

7.  Impact of defecation dysfunction on quality of life in mid-low rectal cancer patients following sphincter-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Baojia Luo; Cong Li; Ying Zhu; Xue Qiu; Liren Li; Zhizhong Pan; Xia Yang; Meichun Zheng
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022-05-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.