Gregor Sachse1, Chris Church2, Michelle Stewart3, Heather Cater4, Lydia Teboul5, Roger D Cox6, Frances M Ashcroft7. 1. Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK. Electronic address: gregor.sachse@dpag.ox.ac.uk. 2. MRC Harwell Institute, Mammalian Genetics Unit and Mary Lyon Centre, Harwell Campus, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RD, UK. Electronic address: churchc@MedImmune.com. 3. MRC Harwell Institute, Mammalian Genetics Unit and Mary Lyon Centre, Harwell Campus, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RD, UK. Electronic address: m.stewart@har.mrc.ac.uk. 4. MRC Harwell Institute, Mammalian Genetics Unit and Mary Lyon Centre, Harwell Campus, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RD, UK. Electronic address: h.cater@har.mrc.ac.uk. 5. MRC Harwell Institute, Mammalian Genetics Unit and Mary Lyon Centre, Harwell Campus, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RD, UK. Electronic address: l.teboul@har.mrc.ac.uk. 6. MRC Harwell Institute, Mammalian Genetics Unit and Mary Lyon Centre, Harwell Campus, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RD, UK. Electronic address: r.cox@har.mrc.ac.uk. 7. Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK. Electronic address: frances.ashcroft@dpag.ox.ac.uk.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords:
Body composition; Body size; Bone mineralization; FTO protein; Mouse model
Genome wide association studies revealed a strong association
between intronic variants in the human fat mass and obesity related
(FTO) gene and body mass index (BMI) in multiple
populations [1], [2], [3], [4]. However, recent evidence suggests that
FTO polymorphism effects on BMI are also mediated by
enhancers located within FTO intron one that affect the
expression of several neighbouring genes, including RPGRIP1L, IRX5 and IRX3
[5], [6], [7].
Moreover, there has been conflicting evidence from rodent models about FTO's
physiological function [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. A loss-of-function point mutation in the human
FTO gene (FTO-R316Q) results in a fatal autosomal recessive
phenotype, but there is insufficient patient data available to conclude if there is
an effect of FTO-R316Q on adiposity [14]. Thus, the role of FTO in lean/fat body composition remains
controversial.Arginine-316 in human FTO corresponds to Arginine-313 in mouse,
which is essential for FTO catalytic activity [15]. FTO is a DNA and RNA demethylase that partly
co-localises with nuclear speckles [15], [16]. N6-Methyladenosine, an abundant mRNA modification
[17], is a major substrate
and is selectively demethylated by FTO [16]. Notably, FTO controls mRNA stability via
m6Am demethylation of the 5′ mRNA cap
[18], [19]. However,
it is not known if FTO exerts all of its functional effects through its demethylase
activity, or if some effects are mediated via allosteric interaction with binding
partners, or a scaffolding function.To determine the physiological importance of FTO
demethylase activity and clarify its role in body composition, we generated a mouse
model for the human FTO-R316Q mutation (mouse FTO-R313A) using
CRISPR/Cas9-facilitated genomic editing [20]. This approach has the advantage that the genomic locus is
edited at a single codon on a homogenous genetic background (Suppl. Fig. 1A), excluding disruption of
intronic regulatory elements or differences in local genetic background which may
have confounded previous FTO loss-of-function studies [11], [12], [13].
Methods
Animal husbandry
Animals were housed under specific opportunistic pathogen-free
(SOPF) conditions, in individually ventilated cages. Mice were kept under
controlled light (light 7 am–7 pm, dark
7 pm–7 am), temperature (21 ± 2 °C) and humidity (55 ± 10%) conditions. They had free access to water
(9–13 ppm chlorine), and were fed ad libitum on a commercial
diet (Rat and Mouse No. 3 Breeding diet, RM3; Diatex Int. Ltd., Witham, UK)
containing 11.5 kcal% fat, 23.93 kcal% protein
and 61.57 kcal% carbohydrate.All animal studies were licensed by the Home Office under the
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Amendment Regulations 2012 (SI 4
2012/3039), UK. All mice were maintained in accordance with the UK Home Office
Welfare guidelines and project licence restrictions. All studies were approved by
the local Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body at MRC Harwell, under the ethical
guidelines issued by the Medical Research Council (Responsibility in the Use of
Animals for Medical Research, July 1993). Mice were euthanized by Home Office
Schedule 1 methods.
Mouse genetic modifications
The FTO-R313A allele was generated by
microinjection of C57BL/6J pronuclei with Cas9 mRNA (100 ng/μl),
guideRNA (TACCTCTGCCACACGGTGAGTGG, 50 ng/μl), and FTO-R313A
donor ssDNA (containing the CGT→GCT
FTO-R313A mutation, length 172 nt, −69 to +103 from mutation,
50 ng/μl). Guided by the RNA oligo, the Cas9 enzyme cuts the
genomic location of Fto exon 5, activating genomic repair
mechanisms that lead to replacement of the original genomic sequence by the donor
ssDNA carrying the R313A encoding mutation [21]. Because the mutation site lies within the
guide sequence (Suppl. Fig.
1A), the guide fails to efficiently target the site after
genomic exchange has happened [22].One drawback of the CRISPR/Cas9 approach is
potential damage to genomic off-target sites [23]. We identified 128 potential off-target
sites for the guide RNA we employed (Zhang Lab CRISPR design tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/)), 15 of which were situated within
genes. Only two of these off-target sites were located on the same chromosome as
the Fto gene (UCSC genes NM_023395 and NM_176940, on
chromosome 8) and thus would not be readily lost during backcrossing. However, PCR
amplification of both these off-target sites, followed by sub-cloning and Sanger
sequencing, confirmed that both were unchanged in R313A mice (Suppl. Fig. 1B).F0 offspring were screened for mosaicism by sub-cloning and
Sanger sequencing of PCR products. Two out of 27 pups were found to be mosaic.
These were mated to C57BL/6J stock to produce non-mosaic F1 animals. Thus the
strain has a pure C57BL/6J background. To avoid strain deviation due spontaneous
mutations, it was maintained by crossing back to C57BL/6J. All experimental
animals were F1 littermates of heterozygous parents.Guide design and prediction of potential off-target sites were
performed using the Zhang Lab CRISPR design tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/).
Local genomic sequences around potential off-target sites were amplified using
PCR, subcloned using Zero Blunt TOPO PCR Cloning Kit (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA)
and analysed by Sanger sequencing.The FTO-R313A allele was genotyped by realtime-PCR followed by
Sanger sequencing. For wildtype animals, primers were, GCTCACAGCCTCGGTTTAGTTC,
ACTGTCCACCCAACGACCTCTG and the probe was
CACTCACCGTGTGGCAGAGGTAA. For R313A: primers
CTGGCTCACAGCCTCGGTTT, CCAACGACCTCTGCCACATTC, probe
AGTTCCACTCACGCTGTGGCA.FTO knockout mice were as described by [13]. The strain is C57BL/6J congenic and
maintained by crossing back to C57BL/6J. The KO allele was genotyped by PCR using
AGCGCTCACTGGAGAGTGTCTG and GAGCCAGAGAGGATTTAGATGGG primers, which produced
989 bp (wildtype) and 237 bp (knockout)
amplification products.
Body mass and composition
Body mass was measured weekly from 3 weeks of
age. Body composition was analysed by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)
(Lunar PIXImus Mouse Densitometer, Wipro GE Healthcare, Madison, WI) or with an
Echo MRI whole body composition analyzer (Echo Medical System, Houston,
TX).
Metabolic rate measurements
At 10 weeks of age, indirect calorimetry
(Oxymax; Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH) was used to determine oxygen
consumption, carbon dioxide production, respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and heat
production. Heat production (energy expenditure) was calculated from Heat = CV × VO2, where CV is calorific value based on the observed RER
and is given by CV = 3.815 + 1.2326 × RER.
Plasma biochemistry
Blood was taken from the tail at week 12 and as a terminal bleed
at week 20 using paediatric lithium heparin coated tubes (Kabe Labortechnik GmbH,
Nümbrecht, Germany) or (for terminal samples) blood samples were collected under
terminal isofluorane inhalation anaesthesia by retro-orbital puncture into
paediatric lithium heparin coated tubes (Kabe Labortechnik GmbH). Whole blood
samples were kept on wet ice until being centrifuged for 10 min
at 8000 × g in a
refrigerated centrifuge set to 8 °C. The resulting plasma was
analysed with a AU680 clinical chemistry analyser (Beckman Coulter, High Wycombe,
UK) using reagents and settings recommended by the manufacturer. Parathyroid
hormone and growth hormone were analysed using ELISA kits from Millipore, Milton,
UK (EZRMGH-45 K) and Immunotopics, Athens, OH (60-2305)
respectively.
Phenotyping
All phenotyping tests were performed according to EMPReSS
(European Phenotyping Resource for Standardised Screens from EUMORPHIA) using
standardised protocols described at (http://empress.har.mrc.ac.uk).
Statistics
Error bars show standard error of the mean (SEM) and middle
crossbars denote the arithmetic mean. Unless otherwise stated,
p-values derive from a Welch
t-test (null hypothesis: no difference between genotypic
group and wildtype littermates). SPSS software (version 20; IBM, North Castle, NY)
and R (http://www.rproject.org/) were used for statistical analysis
and plotting. P values above 0.05 were considered not
significant (n.s.).
Results
Viability
FTO-R313A mice showed reduced viability, the number of homozygous
(R313A/R313A) and heterozygous (R313A/WT) animals being less than 50% and 70%,
respectively, of that predicted by Mendelian inheritance (Table 1). Similarly reduced ratios were found previously for FTO knockout mouse strains
[11], [13].
Premature death occurred prenatally or perinatally, with only four animals (three
R313A/R313A and one R313A/WT), dying between day 3 and weaning. This is
reminiscent of what is found for human patients with the corresponding mutation
[14].
Table 1
Viability of FTO-R313A mice.
Gender
Total
Female
Male
Genotype
WT/WT
R313A/WT
R313A/R313A
WT/WT
R313A/WT
R313A/R313A
WT/WT
R313A/WT
R313A/R313A
Number
69
92
28
34
47
16
35
45
11
Expected
47.25
94.5
47.25
24.25
48.5
24.25
22.75
43.5
22.75
Ratios
1
1.33
0.41
1
1.38
0.47
1
1.29
0.31
Expected
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
χ2-test
p = 0.0002
p = 0.049
p = 0.003
Ratios are expressed relative to the number of WT/WT
animals.
Viability of FTO-R313A mice.Ratios are expressed relative to the number of WT/WT
animals.
Body weight and composition
Viable homozygous FTO-R313A mice consistently weighed ~ 20% less than age-matched littermate controls (Fig. 1). Heterozygous FTO-R313A animals displayed no body weight phenotype and were
not phenotyped further. The reduction in R313A/R313A mouse body mass was
associated with a reduction of lean mass at 9 and 17 weeks as
well as fat mass at 9 weeks, as determined by non-invasive
quantitative NMR (Echo-MRI) scanning (Fig.
2A,B). However, when normalised
to total body weight there were no differences in fat or lean mass (Fig. 2A,B). These findings were
corroborated by DEXA measurements at 20 weeks (Fig. 2C). Visceral versus
sub-cutaneous fat-pad weights were also not different between genotypes
(Fig. 2D).
Fig. 1
Effect of FTO-R313A on body weight.
Body weight in female and male homozygous FTO-R313A mice
(R313A/R313A) and littermate controls (wt/wt). Males: wt/wt
(n = 7), R313A/R313A
(n = 7). Females: wt/wt
(n = 13), R313A/R313A
(n = 13). Data points
denote mean ± SEM.
Fig. 2
Effect of FTO-R313A on body composition.
A,B. Absolute and relative fat and lean
mass in female and male homozygous FTO-R313A mice (R313A/R313A) and littermate
controls (wt/wt) measured by Echo-MRI at 9 (A) and 17
(B) weeks of age. C. Relative fat and lean
mass in male and female mice at 20 weeks of age, measured by
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). D. Post-mortem weights of
visceral and sub-cutaneous white adipose tissue (WAT). Males: wt/wt
(A,Bn = 7;
Cn = 11;
Dn = 3), R313A/R313A
(A,Bn = 7;
Cn = 11;
Dn = 3). Females: wt/wt
(A,Bn = 13;
Cn = 16;
Dn = 9), R313A/R313A
(A,Bn = 13;
Cn = 17;
Dn = 7). Data points
indicate individual animals, horizontal bars denote mean ± SEM.
Effect of FTO-R313A on body weight.Body weight in female and male homozygous FTO-R313A mice
(R313A/R313A) and littermate controls (wt/wt). Males: wt/wt
(n = 7), R313A/R313A
(n = 7). Females: wt/wt
(n = 13), R313A/R313A
(n = 13). Data points
denote mean ± SEM.Effect of FTO-R313A on body composition.A,B. Absolute and relative fat and lean
mass in female and male homozygous FTO-R313A mice (R313A/R313A) and littermate
controls (wt/wt) measured by Echo-MRI at 9 (A) and 17
(B) weeks of age. C. Relative fat and lean
mass in male and female mice at 20 weeks of age, measured by
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). D. Post-mortem weights of
visceral and sub-cutaneous white adipose tissue (WAT). Males: wt/wt
(A,Bn = 7;
Cn = 11;
Dn = 3), R313A/R313A
(A,Bn = 7;
Cn = 11;
Dn = 3). Females: wt/wt
(A,Bn = 13;
Cn = 16;
Dn = 9), R313A/R313A
(A,Bn = 13;
Cn = 17;
Dn = 7). Data points
indicate individual animals, horizontal bars denote mean ± SEM.
Energy expenditure and respiratory exchange
rate
Previous studies of FTO knockout mice have linked altered body
composition to differences in energy expenditure [11] or carbohydrate/fat utilisation, as
exemplified by a significant change in the respiratory exchange rate [13]. However, no significant
differences, after adjustment for lean mass, were found between R313A/R313A mice
and littermate controls (Fig.
3A–D).
Fig. 3
Effect of FTO-R313A on energy expenditure and respiratory
quotient.
A–D. VO2 consumed
(A), VCO2 produced (B),
Energy expenditure (EE, C) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER,
D), measured for 10-week-old male
(n = 7) and female
(n = 13) mice during
the light and dark phases by indirect calorimetry. Data in A–C
were adjusted for lean mass as described previously [13]. #: differences were not statistically
significant after post-hoc Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison. Data
indicate individual animals. Horizontal bars indicate mean ± SEM.
Effect of FTO-R313A on energy expenditure and respiratory
quotient.A–D. VO2 consumed
(A), VCO2 produced (B),
Energy expenditure (EE, C) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER,
D), measured for 10-week-old male
(n = 7) and female
(n = 13) mice during
the light and dark phases by indirect calorimetry. Data in A–C
were adjusted for lean mass as described previously [13]. #: differences were not statistically
significant after post-hoc Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison. Data
indicate individual animals. Horizontal bars indicate mean ± SEM.
Skeletal and bone phenotype
No obvious skeletal malformations were observed in R313A/R313A
mice. However, adult body size was decreased (Fig. 4A,B), and
can explain most (if not all) of the reduction in lean mass, fat mass and total
body mass (Fig. 1,
Fig. 2A,B). Tail length
was reduced by 10% in R313A/R313A mice compared to wt/wt littermates
(Fig. 4C). This was due
to reduced vertebra length, as the number of tail vertebrae was unaltered
(25.0 ± 0.1 and 25.3 ± 0.2, respectively, n = 20). Skull width was decreased by > 4% (Fig. 4D),
perhaps reflecting a smaller brain size, as was recently observed in FTO knockout
animals [24].
Fig. 4
Effect of FTO-R313A on body and tail
length.
A. X-ray pictures of 20-week-old male and
female R313A/R313A and wt/wt mice of representative body length.
B. Body length (nose tip to anus) of 20-week-old male and
female R313A/R313A and wt/wt mice. C. Tail length of 20-week-old
male and female R313A/R313A and wt/wt mice. D. Skull width of
20-week-old male and female R313A/R313A and wt/wt mice. B–D. Data
points indicate individual animals, horizontal bars mean ± SEM. Males: wt/wt (n = 7), R313A/R313A (n = 7). Females: wt/wt (n = 13), R313A/R313A (n = 13).
Effect of FTO-R313A on body and tail
length.A. X-ray pictures of 20-week-old male and
female R313A/R313A and wt/wt mice of representative body length.
B. Body length (nose tip to anus) of 20-week-old male and
female R313A/R313A and wt/wt mice. C. Tail length of 20-week-old
male and female R313A/R313A and wt/wt mice. D. Skull width of
20-week-old male and female R313A/R313A and wt/wt mice. B–D. Data
points indicate individual animals, horizontal bars mean ± SEM. Males: wt/wt (n = 7), R313A/R313A (n = 7). Females: wt/wt (n = 13), R313A/R313A (n = 13).The shorter body and bone length of R313A/R313A mice was
associated with a profound reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone
mineral content (BMC) (Fig.
5A,B). In particular, the BMD of
R313A/R313A mice was 3.0 standard deviations below that of their wt/wt
littermates, which is a greater difference than that used to define osteoporosis
in human patients [25].
Despite these strong effects on bone mineralization, the blood profile of
R313A/R313A mice was largely normal, including plasma calcium, phosphorus,
parathyroid hormone and growth hormone levels (Table 2). However,
alkaline phosphatase activity, an indicator of osteoblast function [26], was noticeably reduced in
R313A/R313A mice.
Fig. 5
Effect of FTO on bone density and mineral
content.
A,B. Bone mineral density
(A) and bone mineral content (B) of
20 week homozygous FTO-R313A mice (R313A/R313A,
n = 17(f),
n = 11(m)) and
littermate controls (wt/wt, n = 16(f), n = 11(m)), measured by DEXA.
C,D. Bone mineral density
(C) and bone mineral content (D) of
homozygous FTO knockout mice (ko/ko, n = 30(f), n = 32(m)), littermate heterozygous FTO knockout mice (wt/ko,
n = 19(f),
n = 17(m)) and
littermate controls (wt/wt, n = 7(f), n = 8(m)) for both genders at 24 weeks of age.
E,F. Bone mineral density
(E) and bone mineral content (F) of male
homozygous FTO-I367F mice (I367F/I367F, n = 15) and littermate controls (wt/wt,
n = 14) at 24 weeks of age.
Bone mineral density values in A,
C and E were adjusted for body mass by
multiple linear regression. Data points indicate individual animals, horizontal bars
mean ± SEM.
Table 2
Plasma biochemistry of FTO-R313A mice.
20 Weeks terminal
bleed
Female
Male
FTO-wt
FTO-R313A
FTO-wt
FTO-R313A
(n = 11)
(n = 11)
(n = 4)
(n = 5)
Sodium (mM)
146.6 ± 0.5
145.8 ± 0.4
n.s.
149.0 ± 0.4
149.8 ± 0.5
n.s.
Potassium (mM)
4.9 ± 0.1
4.9 ± 0.2
n.s.
5.0 ± 0.2
5.1 ± 0.3
n.s.
Chloride (mM)
113.2 ± 0.6
112.6 ± 0.5
n.s.
112.6 ± 0.7
113.8 ± 0.8
n.s.
Urea (mM)
10.3 ± 0.7
10.8 ± 0.5
n.s.
9.9 ± 0.8
12.4 ± 0.8
n.s.
Creatinine (μM)
16.5 ± 0.9
15.5 ± 0.5
n.s.
15.8 ± 0.8
15.3 ± 1.1
n.s.
Calcium (mM)a
2.60 ± 0.02
2.60 ± 0.02
n.s.
2.64 ± 0.02
2.68 ± 0.04
n.s.
Inorganic phosphorus (mM)
2.3 ± 0.1
2.5 ± 0.1
n.s.
2.3 ± 0.1
2.3 ± 0.1
n.s.
Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L)
117 ± 3
102 ± 3
p = 0.003
85 ± 1
58 ± 4
p = 0.004
PTH (pg/mL)
216 ± 47
260 ± 64
n.s.
210 ± 52
(n = 5)
160 ± 35
n.s.
GH (ng/mL)
6.5 ± 2.0
6.1 ± 2.7(n = 10)
n.s.
6.2 ± 2.3(n = 5)
12.6 ± 7.0
n.s.
PTH: Parathyroid hormone; GH: Growth
hormone.
Calcium corrected for plasma albumin
[Ca]corr = [Ca] + 0.02 mM ∗ (40 − [Alb] ∗ g− 1 L).
Effect of FTO on bone density and mineral
content.A,B. Bone mineral density
(A) and bone mineral content (B) of
20 week homozygous FTO-R313A mice (R313A/R313A,
n = 17(f),
n = 11(m)) and
littermate controls (wt/wt, n = 16(f), n = 11(m)), measured by DEXA.C,D. Bone mineral density
(C) and bone mineral content (D) of
homozygous FTO knockout mice (ko/ko, n = 30(f), n = 32(m)), littermate heterozygous FTO knockout mice (wt/ko,
n = 19(f),
n = 17(m)) and
littermate controls (wt/wt, n = 7(f), n = 8(m)) for both genders at 24 weeks of age.E,F. Bone mineral density
(E) and bone mineral content (F) of male
homozygous FTO-I367F mice (I367F/I367F, n = 15) and littermate controls (wt/wt,
n = 14) at 24 weeks of age.Bone mineral density values in A,
C and E were adjusted for body mass by
multiple linear regression. Data points indicate individual animals, horizontal bars
mean ± SEM.Plasma biochemistry of FTO-R313A mice.PTH: Parathyroid hormone; GH: Growth
hormone.Calcium corrected for plasma albumin
[Ca]corr = [Ca] + 0.02 mM ∗ (40 − [Alb] ∗ g− 1 L).Like R313A/R313A mice, homozygous FTO knockout mice are smaller
than wt/wt. [11], [13]. We therefore performed DEXA scanning on FTO knockout
animals to determine if they also show a bone phenotype, as this was not reported
in previous studies. Fig.
5C,D show that BMD and BMC were reduced in FTO knockout mice, but
not in wildtype or heterozygous littermates. Interestingly, mice with a homozygous
I367F mutation in FTO, which reduces catalytic activity of FTO by 80%
[10], had normal body
size [10] and unaltered
BMD and BMC (Fig. 5E,F).
Interestingly in this context, the HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor IOX3 has been
shown to reduce FTO expression in vitro and affects BMD/BMC when administered in
vivo [27].
Discussion
Our data demonstrate that lack of FTO enzymatic activity results in
a marked reduction of bone mineral density and bone mineral content, comparable to
that seen in osteoporosis [25]. These changes were not seen in heterozygous FTO knockout
animals or in homozygous FTO-I367F/I367F mice [10], which retain roughly 50% and 20% of wildtype
demethylase activity respectively. This indicates a relatively small amount of
catalytic activity is sufficient to rescue the bone phenotype. The mechanism behind
the BMD and BMC reduction remains to be elucidated, but reduced alkaline phosphatase
levels in FTO-R313A suggest osteoblast function might be affected.The catalytic activity of FTO is also required for normal body size,
as R313A/R313A mice had reduced body length and body mass, like global FTO knockout
mice. Again, only a minimum amount of FTO catalytic activity is necessary, as
heterozygous FTO-R313A mice, FTO-I367F/I367F mice [10] and FTO overexpressing mice [12] all have normal body length.
Reduced body size is typically seen in mouse models where bone mineralization is
affected, especially those with growth factor disturbances [28], [29]. Reduced size and bone
mineralization also occur in multiple mouse models of premature aging [30], [31], [32], [33] and
in mouse models with substantial fetal growth restriction [34]. Unfortunately, studies on mouse models with
growth retardation but bone-unrelated phenotypes rarely report bone mineralization
data [35], [36], [37].The enzymatic activity of FTO was also essential for normal
perinatal viability. As viability was also reduced in heterozygous FTO-R313A animals,
this seems unrelated to the bone phenotype. The cause of sub-viability remains
enigmatic, as studies of FTO knockout embryos did not reveal any obvious
malformations or defects [11]. However, the reduced viability and smaller body size mimic the
phenotype of the corresponding autosomal recessive human mutation [14].Our results further show that FTO demethylase activity is not
essential for normal body composition. Germline deletion of FTO also had no effect on
body composition in one study [13], although reduced fat mass has been reported in another FTO
knockout model [11]. The
range of previous FTO knockout phenotypes (reviewed in Merkestein & Sellayah,
2015 [38]), may reflect
disruption of intronic regulatory elements or differences in strain background,
environmental factors and experimental protocols. In contrast, FTO overexpression
results in a clear gene-dose-dependent increase in body fat and food intake
[12], suggesting excess
levels of FTO enhance appetite and thereby alter body composition. A role for FTO
demethylase activity in adipose tissue cannot be excluded, however, as FTO-R313A
overexpression was unable to rescue an adipogenesis phenotype in FTO knockout
embryonic cells [39]. Also,
acute loss of FTO in adulthood resulted in a sudden cessation of lean mass growth
followed by a compensatory rise in fat mass [13]. Because FTO-R313A/R313A mice have a constitutive germline
loss-of-function, potentially, effects on adipogenesis may be compensated during
development.We saw no change in RER in homozygous FTO catalytic null mice, in
contrast to the reduction observed in FTO knockout animals [13]. This suggests FTO may regulate RER via a
non-catalytic function, such as allosteric effects on binding partners, recruitment
of factors to different sub-cellular locations, or a scaffolding function. A role for
FTO that is unconnected to its catalytic activity may also help explain some of the
phenotypic variability seen in FTO loss-of-function mouse models [10], [11], [13], in which both
catalytic and non-catalytic phenotypes overlap.
Conclusions
FTO catalytic activity is needed for normal body size and viability,
although it is not required for normal fat/lean body composition, energy expenditure
or respiratory quotient. Lack of enzymatic activity results in substantial
osteoporotic changes that are rescued by as little as 20% of control catalytic
levels. The key findings necessitate a thorough re-interpretation of previous FTO
loss-of-function studies and introduce FTO as a novel regulator of bone growth and
mineralization.The following is the supplementary data related to
this article.
Supplementary Fig. 1
Generation of the FTO-R313A
allele.A. Sequence at the genomic
locus of the Fto gene, on mouse chromosome 8. Out of several mRNA guides
used for the CRISPR approach, the successful guide (green) was the one
binding on top of the mutation site. Shown in pink is the stretch of
sequence that was injected as single strand DNA to serve as donor for
mutation by homologous repair. Shown in orange is Fto exon 5, with the
translated amino acids shown below. CG → GC is the sequence change introduced to result in the
Arg313Ala mutation.B. At the top, potential
off-target sites, determined using Zhang Lab CRISPR design tool
(http://crispr.mit.edu/). From left to right: sequence
at locus; likeliness-score for off-target mutation; number & position
of mismatches compared to guide/geneID/chromosomal location. The tables
below show an overview of the respective control checks. Each locus was
checked for several animals, both wildtype (WT) controls, to show the
locus is correctly detected, and HOM R313A/R313A animals. For each
animal, several clones were amplified, subcloned with a TOPO PCR cloning
kit (Thermo Fisher) and sequenced (TOPO clones A,B etc.). Sequences shown
are the sequences amplified and sub-cloned, the guide RNA binding
position is marked in red. None of the successful sequencings uncovered
any mutation, indel or other damage to the sites.
Transparency document
Transparency document
Ackowledgements
We thank Rosie Hillier and other staff of the Mary Lyon Centre for
animal care. We thank Tertius Hough for clinical chemistry analysis. We thank the
Wellcome Trust (grants 884655, 089795) and the Medical Research
Council (MC_U142661184) for support. FMA holds an ERC Advanced
Investigator award and a Royal Society/Wolfson Merit Award.
Author contributions
GS, CC, RC and FMA designed research; GS, CC, MS, HC and LT
performed research and analysed data; GS, RC and FMA wrote the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.
Authors: Kate D Meyer; Yogesh Saletore; Paul Zumbo; Olivier Elemento; Christopher E Mason; Samie R Jaffrey Journal: Cell Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: F J Giordano; H P Gerber; S P Williams; N VanBruggen; S Bunting; P Ruiz-Lozano; Y Gu; A K Nath; Y Huang; R Hickey; N Dalton; K L Peterson; J Ross; K R Chien; N Ferrara Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-05-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: George Stratigopoulos; Lisa Cole Burnett; Richard Rausch; Richard Gill; David Barth Penn; Alicja A Skowronski; Charles A LeDuc; Anthony J Lanzano; Pumin Zhang; Daniel R Storm; Dieter Egli; Rudolph L Leibel Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Chris Church; Sheena Lee; Eleanor A L Bagg; James S McTaggart; Robert Deacon; Thomas Gerken; Angela Lee; Lee Moir; Jasmin Mecinović; Mohamed M Quwailid; Christopher J Schofield; Frances M Ashcroft; Roger D Cox Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2009-08-14 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Christian Dina; David Meyre; Sophie Gallina; Emmanuelle Durand; Antje Körner; Peter Jacobson; Lena M S Carlsson; Wieland Kiess; Vincent Vatin; Cecile Lecoeur; Jérome Delplanque; Emmanuel Vaillant; François Pattou; Juan Ruiz; Jacques Weill; Claire Levy-Marchal; Fritz Horber; Natascha Potoczna; Serge Hercberg; Catherine Le Stunff; Pierre Bougnères; Peter Kovacs; Michel Marre; Beverley Balkau; Stéphane Cauchi; Jean-Claude Chèvre; Philippe Froguel Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2007-05-13 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Angelo Scuteri; Serena Sanna; Wei-Min Chen; Manuela Uda; Giuseppe Albai; James Strait; Samer Najjar; Ramaiah Nagaraja; Marco Orrú; Gianluca Usala; Mariano Dei; Sandra Lai; Andrea Maschio; Fabio Busonero; Antonella Mulas; Georg B Ehret; Ashley A Fink; Alan B Weder; Richard S Cooper; Pilar Galan; Aravinda Chakravarti; David Schlessinger; Antonio Cao; Edward Lakatta; Gonçalo R Abecasis Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Qian Zhang; Ryan C Riddle; Qian Yang; Clifford R Rosen; Denis C Guttridge; Naomi Dirckx; Marie-Claude Faugere; Charles R Farber; Thomas L Clemens Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michał Marcinkowski; Tomaš Pilžys; Damian Garbicz; Jan Piwowarski; Damian Mielecki; Grzegorz Nowaczyk; Michał Taube; Maciej Gielnik; Maciej Kozak; Maria Winiewska-Szajewska; Ewa Szołajska; Janusz Dębski; Agnieszka M Maciejewska; Kaja Przygońska; Karolina Ferenc; Elżbieta Grzesiuk; Jarosław Poznański Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Ziyi Xiong; Gabriela Dankova; Timothy D Spector; Evie Stergiakouli; Seth M Weinberg; Fan Liu; Manfred Kayser; Laurence J Howe; Myoung Keun Lee; Pirro G Hysi; Markus A de Jong; Gu Zhu; Kaustubh Adhikari; Dan Li; Yi Li; Bo Pan; Eleanor Feingold; Mary L Marazita; John R Shaffer; Kerrie McAloney; Shu-Hua Xu; Li Jin; Sijia Wang; Femke Ms de Vrij; Bas Lendemeijer; Stephen Richmond; Alexei Zhurov; Sarah Lewis; Gemma C Sharp; Lavinia Paternoster; Holly Thompson; Rolando Gonzalez-Jose; Maria Catira Bortolini; Samuel Canizales-Quinteros; Carla Gallo; Giovanni Poletti; Gabriel Bedoya; Francisco Rothhammer; André G Uitterlinden; M Arfan Ikram; Eppo Wolvius; Steven A Kushner; Tamar Ec Nijsten; Robert-Jan Ts Palstra; Stefan Boehringer; Sarah E Medland; Kun Tang; Andres Ruiz-Linares; Nicholas G Martin Journal: Elife Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 8.140