| Literature DB >> 29202806 |
Flemming K Nielsen1, Niels Egund2, Anette Jørgensen3, Anne Grethe Jurik2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether clinical, radiographic or MRI findings are associated with long term risk for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in persons with knee osteoarthritis.Entities:
Keywords: Bone marrow lesion; Joint space narrowing; Knee osteoarthritis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiography; Synovitis
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29202806 PMCID: PMC5715644 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1871-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Diagram showing participant flow. MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; OA: osteoarthritis
Baseline characteristics at inclusion and predictors of knee replacement, univariate and multivariate analyses
| Total | Knee replacement | Unadjusted | Adjusteda | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | ( | Yes ( | No ( | OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
|
| Female, % (no.) | 64% (64) | 68% (45) | 56% (19) | 1.0 (0.9 – 1.0) | 0.52 | ||
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 62.0 (10.4) | 61.3 (10.0) | 63.4 (10.9) | 1.0 (0.9 – 1.0) | 0.34 | ||
| BMI grade, mean (SD) | 2.2 (0.9) | 2.2 (0.9) | 2.0 (0.9) | 1.2 (0.8 – 2.0) | 0.41 | ||
| WOMAC, mean (SD): | |||||||
|
| 184 (89) | 196 (95) | 161 (71) | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.0) | 0.07 | ||
|
| 81 (45) | 87(46) | 67 (40) | 1.3 (1.01 – 1.6)c | 0.04 | 1.3 (1.01 – 1.7)c | 0.04 |
|
| 657 (319) | 692 (332) | 588 (281) | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.0) | 0.13 | ||
|
| 922 (427) | 976 (446) | 817 (366) | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.0) | 0.08 | ||
| Hyalgan %, (no.) | 48% (48) | 50% (33) | 44% (15) | 1.3 (0.6 – 2.9) | 0.58 | ||
| JSN grade, mean (SD) | 1.7 (1.0) | 2.0 (0.9) | 1.0 (0.8) | 3.6 (2.1 - 6.2) | <0.001 | 5.0 (2.6 - 9.9) | <0.001 |
| Radiological sum score, mean (SD) | 5.0 (2.6) | 5.8 (2.3) | 3.4 (2.5) | 1.5 (1.3 - 1.9) | <0.001 | 1.7 (1.3 - 2.1) | <0.001 |
| BML grade, mean (SD)b, d | 2.1 (1.4) | 2.4 (1.5) | 1.4 (0.9) | 2.1 (1.2 – 3.7) | 0.006 | 2.3 (1.3 – 4.0) | 0.005 |
| Synovitis grade, mean (SD)b, e | 2.6 (1.0) | 2.9 (0.9) | 2.0 (1.1) | 2.7 (1.5 – 4.7) | 0.001 | 2.8 (1.5 – 5.2) | 0.001 |
| Effusion grade, mean (SD)b, f | 2.4 (1.5) | 2.7 (1.6) | 1.7 (1.1) | 1.9 (1.2 – 3.0) | 0.005 | 1.9 (1.2 – 3.1) | 0.006 |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, No. number, SD standard deviation, BMI body mass index, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA index, JSN joint space narrowing, BML bone marrow lesion
aAdjusted for sex, age and BMI; b Based on 83 participants with MRI scans and tibiofemoral osteoarthritis; c Logistic regression performed after ordering data into a ten point ordinal scale (Grade 1 = 0 – 10, grade 2 = 11 – 20 etc.); d Ordered into a ten point ordinal scale (Grade 1 = 0 - 10% BML, grade 2 = >10 - 20% BML etc.); eOrdered into a five point ordinal scale (Grade 1 = 0 - <5; grade 2 = 5 - <10 etc.); f Ordered into an eight point ordinal scale (Grade 1 = 0 - < 5; grade 2 = 5 - <10 etc.) (maximum effusion score = 38)
Fig. 2Kaplan-Meier plot showing the cumulative incidence of TKA in relation to different degrees of JSN, BML, synovitis and effusion. TKA: total knee arthroplasty; JSN: joint space narrowing; BML: bone marrow lesion
Cox proportional hazard ratios
| Unadjusted | Adjusteda | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
|
| JSN grade | 2.2 (1.7 – 2.9) | <0.001 | 2.2 (1.7 – 3.0) | <0.001 |
| Total radiological score | 1.3 (1.1 – 1.4) | <0.001 | 1.3 (1.1 – 1.4) | <0.001 |
| BML grade, b | 1.5 (1.2 – 1.7) | <0.001 | 1.5 (1.2 – 1.8) | <0.001 |
| Synovitis grade, c | 1.5 (1.2 – 1.9) | 0.001 | 1.5 (1.2 – 1.9) | 0.001 |
| Effusion grade, d | 1.3 (1.1 – 1.5) | 0.002 | 1.3 (1.1 – 1.5) | 0.001 |
CI confidence interval, JSN joint space narrowing, BML bone marrow lesion
aAdjusted for sex, age and BMI (body mass index); b Ordered into a ten point ordinal scale (Grade 1 = 0 - 10% BML, grade 2 = >10 - 20% BML etc.); c Ordered into a five point ordinal scale (Grade 1 = 0 - <5; grade 2 = 5 - <10 etc.); d Ordered into an eight point ordinal scale (Grade 1 = 0 - <5; grade 2 = 5 - <10 etc.) (maximum effusion score = 38)
Baseline characteristics and predictors of unilateral versus bilateral knee replacement, univariate and multivariate analyses
| Total | Knee replacement | Unadjusted | Adjusteda | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | (n = 66) | Unilateral ( | Bilateral ( | OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
|
| Female, % (no.) | 68% (45) | 76% (22) | 62% (23) | 1.0 (0.9 – 1.0) | 0.24 | ||
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 61.3 (10.0) | 62.9 (11.0) | 59.9 (9.0) | 0.5 (0.2 – 1.5) | 0.23 | ||
| BMI, grade, mean (SD) | 2.2 (0.9) | 1.9 (0.9) | 2.5 (0.9) | 2.3 (1.2 – 4.3) | 0.009 | ||
| WOMAC, mean (SD), baseline: | |||||||
|
| 196 (95) | 206 (91) | 189 (98) | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.0) | 0.48 | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.0) | 0.42 |
|
| 87(46) | 83 (47) | 91 (44) | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.0) | 0.44 | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.0) | 0.76 |
|
| 692 (332) | 682 (320) | 701 (340) | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.0) | 0.82 | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.0) | 0.69 |
|
| 976 (446) | 970 (420) | 981 (465) | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.0) | 0.92 | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.0) | 0.66 |
| JSN grade, mean (SD) | 2.0 (0.9) | 1.9 (0.9) | 2.1 (0.9) | 1.3 (0.8 – 2.3) | 0.30 | 2.2 (1.0 – 4.6) | 0.05 |
| Radiological sum score, mean (SD) | 5.8 (2.3) | 5.4 (2.4) | 6.1 (2.2) | 1.1 (0.9 – 1.4) | 0.26 | 1.4 (1.0 – 1.9) | 0.05 |
| BML grade, mean (SD)b, c | 2.4 (1.6) | 2.5 (1.7) | 2.4 (1.5) | 1.0 (0.7 – 1.3) | 0.82 | 0.9 (0.6 – 1.3) | 0.63 |
| Synovitis grade, mean (SD)b, d | 2.9 (0.9) | 2.8 (1.1) | 2.9 (0.7) | 1.2 (0.7 – 2.1) | 0.61 | 1.1 (0.6 – 2.1) | 0.78 |
| Effusion grade, mean (SD)b, e | 2.7 (1.6) | 2.4 (1.7) | 3.0 (1.5) | 1.3 (0.9 – 1.8) | 0.20 | 1.2 (0.8 – 1.7) | 0.39 |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, No. number, SD standard deviation, BMI body mass index, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA index, JSN joint space narrowing, BML bone marrow lesion
aAdjusted for sex, age and BMI; b Based on 56 participants with total knee arthroplasty, accessible MRI scan and tibiofemoral osteoarthritis; c Ordered into a ten point ordinal scale (Grade 1 = 0 - 10% BML, grade 2 = >10 - 20% BML etc.); d Ordered into a five point ordinal scale (Grade 1 = 0 - <5; grade 2 = 5 - <10 etc.); e Ordered into an eight point ordinal scale (Grade 1 = 0 - <5; grade 2 = 5 - <10 etc.) (maximum effusion score = 38)