Literature DB >> 29201872

Establishing an evaluation mode with multiple primary outcomes based on combination of diseases and symptoms in TCM clinical trials.

Jing Hu1, Shuo Liu2, Weihong Liu1, Huina Zhang1, Jing Chen3, Hongcai Shang2.   

Abstract

The development of a scientific evaluation tool is a prerequisite to reflect the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). At present, separate analysis of each outcome is the most commonly used method in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TCM, while this method has been reported to have some limitations. Combination evaluation of multiple primary outcomes including diseases and symptoms can reflect the efficacy of TCM comprehensively and objectively. Now, several multivariate statistical methods have been proposed to analyze RCTs with multiple clinical outcomes. In this article, we highlighted the two commonly used methods, global statistical test (GST) methodology and alpha-adjustment procedures, and introduced an evaluation mode. First, we used one stage adaptive adjustment strategy to estimate the correlation among multiple primary outcomes in blindness, which can resolve the inappropriate correlation estimation among multiple primary outcomes, then we introduced an adaptation of the Bonferroni procedure which can account for correlated data to calculate the alpha of individual outcome. GST using O'Brien ranking procedure and the corresponding global treatment effect (GTE) measure were used to assess the treatment's global impact. We will conduct a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with compound Danshen dripping pills for stable angina to explore establishing the evaluation mode. We hope that the introduction of this approach can provide methodological aid for the assessment of therapeutic effect of TCM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Combination of diseases and syndromes; multiple primary outcomes; randomized controlled trials (RCTs); traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)

Year:  2017        PMID: 29201872      PMCID: PMC5690965          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  25 in total

1.  Efficacy endpoint selection and multiplicity adjustment methods in clinical trials with inherent multiple endpoint issues.

Authors:  Abdul J Sankoh; Ralph B D'Agostino; Mohammad F Huque
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Comparison of the global statistical test and composite outcome for secondary analyses of multiple coronary heart disease outcomes.

Authors:  Sarah Baraniuk; Roann Seay; Arup K Sinha; Linda B Piller
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.194

3.  [Innovative clinical scientific researches promotes the chinese medicine development grounding on globalization].

Authors:  Ka Kit Hui; Wei-jun Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi       Date:  2010-08

Review 4.  Traditional Chinese medicine: potential approaches from modern dynamical complexity theories.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Kehua Zhou; Jing Fan; Shuchen Sun
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  A comparison of multiplicity adjustment strategies for correlated binary endpoints.

Authors:  Andrew C Leon; Moonseong Heo
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 6.  How to deal with multiple endpoints in clinical trials.

Authors:  Markus Neuhäuser
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.748

7.  Bonferroni-based correction factor for multiple, correlated endpoints.

Authors:  Qian Shi; Emily S Pavey; Rickey E Carter
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 1.894

8.  [Preliminary study of establishing clinical effect evaluation methods of Chinese medicine based on combination of disease and syndrome, systematic staging, and multi-dimension index].

Authors:  Wang Xian-liang; Mao Jing-yuan; Hou Ya-zhu
Journal:  Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi       Date:  2013-02

9.  The analysis of multiple endpoints in clinical trials.

Authors:  S J Pocock; N L Geller; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  A rank-based sample size method for multiple outcomes in clinical trials.

Authors:  Peng Huang; Robert F Woolson; Peter C O'Brien
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Discovery Strategy for Active Compounds of Chinese Medicine Based on the Prediction Model of Compound-Disease Relationship.

Authors:  Mengqi Huo; Sha Peng; Jing Li; Yanling Zhang; Yanjiang Qiao
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.501

Review 2.  The Use of Multiple Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Chinese Herbal Medicine.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Shuo Feng; Xiaoli Zhang; Huina Zhang; Yanxiang Ha; Chongyang Wei; Xuejiao Wang; Rui Zhang; Xing Liao; Bo Li
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Study protocol for yoga-based lifestyle intervention for healthy ageing phenotype in the older adults (yHAP): a two-armed, waitlist randomised controlled trial with multiple primary outcomes.

Authors:  Vijaya Majumdar; Atmakur Snigdha; N K Manjunath; Raghuram Nagarathna; Ramesh Mavathur; Amit Singh; Kalpana S R; Nagendra H R
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.