Literature DB >> 14518019

Efficacy endpoint selection and multiplicity adjustment methods in clinical trials with inherent multiple endpoint issues.

Abdul J Sankoh1, Ralph B D'Agostino, Mohammad F Huque.   

Abstract

The ideal approach for the design and analysis of clinical trials is to select a single primary endpoint that provides a complete characterization of the disease under study and permits an efficient evaluation of the effect of a test drug. However, this is often not possible for a number of diseases or clinical trials. This paper examines some practical clinical decision-making scenarios for the selection and analysis of efficacy outcome measures in clinical trials with inherent multiplicity components. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14518019     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  16 in total

1.  Considerations for Endpoint Selection When Designing HIV Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Katherine Huppler Hullsiek; Birgit Grund
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  The use and abuse of multiple outcomes in randomized controlled depression trials.

Authors:  Kristin M Tyler; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Nicholas J Horton
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Study design of ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE): a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  A web application for the design of multi-arm clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael J Grayling; James Ms Wason
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Establishing an evaluation mode with multiple primary outcomes based on combination of diseases and symptoms in TCM clinical trials.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Shuo Liu; Weihong Liu; Huina Zhang; Jing Chen; Hongcai Shang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-11

6.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Mobile Health Intervention to Promote Self-Management After Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  A DeVito Dabbs; M K Song; B A Myers; R Li; R P Hawkins; J M Pilewski; C A Bermudez; J Aubrecht; A Begey; M Connolly; M Alrawashdeh; M A Dew
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Alternative methods for testing treatment effects on the basis of multiple outcomes: simulation and case study.

Authors:  Frank B Yoon; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Stuart R Lipsitz; Nicholas J Horton; Nan M Laird; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Testing for heterogeneity among the components of a binary composite outcome in a clinical trial.

Authors:  Janice Pogue; Lehana Thabane; P J Devereaux; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Utility-based designs for randomized comparative trials with categorical outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas A Murray; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Comparisons of methods for multiple hypothesis testing in neuropsychological research.

Authors:  Richard E Blakesley; Sati Mazumdar; Mary Amanda Dew; Patricia R Houck; Gong Tang; Charles F Reynolds; Meryl A Butters
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.