Literature DB >> 29201791

Psychological Results of 438 Patients with persisting Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms by Symptom Checklist 90-Revised Questionnaire.

Xia Chen1, Ping Li1, Fei Wang1, Guozhong Ji1, Lin Miao1, Sihong You1.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects mental state and social activities. On the contrary, mental disorders may also play a crucial role in GERD symptoms. The purpose of the study was to analyze the data of Symptom Checklist 90-Revised (SCL-90-R) questionnaire from patients with persisting GERD and to explore the impact of psychological factors on them.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients accepted SCL-90-R questionnaire survey, following endoscopy, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring. Based on these results, we divided patients into different groups. The result of SCL-90-R was also compared with degree of acid reflux, symptoms, symptom duration, and gender.
RESULTS: The data from 438 patients were analyzed. All patients were divided into reflux esophagitis (RE; 63, 14.38%); nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD; 106, 24.20%); functional heartburn (FH; 123, 28.08%), hypersensitive esophagus (HE; 67, 15.29%), diffuse esophageal spasm (DES; 5: 1.14%), hypertensive (10, 3.42%); weak peristalsis (14, 3.20%); achalasia (50, 11.42%). There were significant differences between different groups regarding depression (DEP), anxiety (ANX), paranoid ideation (PAR), and psychoticism (PSY). The patients with ≥2 years with GERD presented with increased scores in DEP, ANX, and PSY. Women had dramatically higher scores than men in each domain (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Data have shown that GERD patients exhibit differential levels of psychological symptoms. Long duration of GERD was related to typical plus atypical symptoms and females seem to be more prone to develop psychological disorders.How to cite this article: Chen X, Li P, Wang F, Ji G, Miao L, You S. Psychological Results of 438 Patients with persisting Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms by Symptom Checklist 90-Revised Questionnaire. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2017;7(2):117-121.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-resolution manometry; Impedance-pH monitoring; Refractory proton pump inhibitor symptoms; Symptom checklist 90-Revised questionnaire.; Gastroesophageal reflux disease

Year:  2017        PMID: 29201791      PMCID: PMC5670252          DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol        ISSN: 2231-5047


INTRODUCTION

Due to several factors, the incidence of GERD has been increasing in Asian and Western countries.[12] Therapeutic strategy for GERD mainly involves the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Despite treatment with standard PPI dose, unfortunately, 20 to 30% of patients still suffer from troublesome GERD symptoms.[3] Persisting GERD symptoms cause discomfort, impair quality of life, and affect mental state and social activities. Likewise, the subsequent development of mental disorders, such as ANX, and depressive symptoms also plays a crucial role on GERD symptom deterioration and has a negative effect on people’s quality of life.[4] As a self-report questionnaire may be able to provide multidimensional and normative data, the SCL-90-R is widely used for all psychiatric patients. Some medical groups applied SCL-90-R to evaluate the psychological state of patients with chronic diseases.[56] Previous studies suggest that the SCL-90-R could be valuable in evaluating psychological factors and, therefore, recommend it for psychosocial investigation in varied disease clinical practice.[7-9] However, data from patients with persisting refractory GERD symptom based on SCL-90-R questionnaire have not been properly evaluated. This study focused on the psychological state of refractory GERD patients using SCL-90-R. We intended to find the differences between several conditions of refractory GERD symptom and to assess if SCL-90-R would be a new, simple method for screening patients with GERD in a community hospital. Consequently, it may be helpful for gastroenterologists to choose relatively precise diagnostic approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The target patients were all with persisting GERD symptoms after 8-week trial of once-daily PPI therapy from October 2010 to November 2015. Exclusion criteria included previous psychopathological disease; previous digestive disease surgery; organic disease in digestive tract; severe comorbidity; any type of cancer; currently taking psychological drugs; and diagnosis of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). The tests, such as SCL-90-R,[10] upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and HRM (Given Imaging, Los Angeles, California) were accomplished; 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring (Given Imaging, Los Angeles, California) was done. Data of HRM and impedance-pH monitoring analysis were performed using software (Mano View software; Sierra Scientific Instrument Inc, Los Angeles, California). The SCL-90-R consists of 90 items, evaluating psychopathological and somatic status on a 4-point scale. The scale ranges from 0 (absence of the symptom) to 4 (maximum disturbance). These items are divided into nine scale markers as: DEP; somatization (SOM); ANX; obsessive-compulsive behavior (O-C); hostility (HOS); interpersonal sensitivity (I-S); phobic anxiety (PHOB); PSY; and PAR. Every dimension includes 6 to 13 questions. The score on each dimension represents the mean score of the dimension and directly reflects the severity of the mental health problem. Subscale scores >2 were suggestive of potential mental health issues. The global severity index (GSI) indicates the mean score of 90 items.[11] Based on endoscopy, HRM, and impedance-pH monitoring, we divided patients into subgroups, such as NERD, RE, FH, HE, DES, hypertensive, weak peristalsis, and achalasia. The diagnosis was made and classified according to the Chicago classification and previously published criteria.[1213]

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data analysis was performed independently by two investigators unaware of the status of individuals. The data were shown as mean ± standard deviation. Analysis of variance for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 13.0 was accomplished. A p-value <0.05 was significant and all p values were two-sided.

RESULTS

Clinical Characteristics

A total of 438 patients (137 male, 301 female, age 51.42 ± 17.30 years) were analyzed in this study (Table 1). Symptom duration of these patients was 4.02 ± 1.45 years. There were 271 (61.87%) patients with heartburn and 239 (54.57%) with regurgitation, 189 (43.15%) with retrosternal discomfort and pain (Table 1). All patients were divided into RE (63, 14.38%), NERD (106, 24.20%), FH (123, 28.08%), HE (67, 15.29%), DES (5, 1.14%), hypertensive (10, 3.42%), weak peristalsis (14, 3.20%), achalasia (50, 11.42%).

Table 1: Demographics and clinical characteristics

Characteristics (n = 438)    n    %    
Age (years)    51.42 ± 17.30        
  Range    19-83        
Gender            
  Male    137    31.28    
  Female    301    68.72    
BMI    23.42 ± 10.37        
RE    63    14.38    
NERD    106    24.20    
HE    123    28.08    
FH    67    15.29    
DES    5    1.14    
Hypertensive    10    3.42    
Weak peristalsis    14    3.20    
Achalasia    49    11.19    
Smoking    142    32.42    
Alcohol consumption    145    33.10    
Drug history            
  Calcium ion antagonist    179    40.87    
  Aspirin    153    34.93    
  Hypnotic drug    51    11.64    
Past medical history    253        
Symptom            
  Duration (years)    4.02±1.45        
  Heartburn    271    61.87    
  Regurgitation    239    54.57    
  Retrosternal discomfort and pain    189    43.15    
  Cough    74    16.89    
  Asthma    19    4.34    
  Hoarseness    34    7.76    
  Throat discomfort    195    44.52    
Foreign body sensation in throat    113    25.80    
Globus sensation    63    14.38    
Belching    204    46.58    
  Dysphagia    152    34.70    
  Epigastric pain and epigastric discomfort    204    46.58    

BMI: Body Mass Index

Table 1: Demographics and clinical characteristics BMI: Body Mass Index Table 2: Scores in different groups *p < 0.05 between groups

SCL-90-R Questionnaire Survey

We investigated the scores of SCL-90-R in different groups (Table 2). The results indicated that the scores had significant differences between various groups as shown by DEP, ANX, PAR, PSY, and GSI. In DEP domain, the score in RE group was less than that in NERD, FH, achalasia groups (p < 0.05); the score in NERD was more than in HE and hypertensive groups (p < 0.05); the score in FH was more than in hypertensive and HE (p < 0.05); the score in achalasia was more than in HE as well as hypertensive groups (p < 0.05). About ANX domain, we found RE group had less score than in NERD and achalasia groups (p < 0.05); NERD group had more than HE group (p < 0.05); FH group had more score than HE group (p < 0.05); achalasia had more score than HE and hypertensive groups (p < 0.05). For PSY, the score of achalasia group showed higher level than RE, NERD, FH, and HE groups (p < 0.05); the score of FH group was more than hypertensive group (p < 0.05). For PAR, NERD group had more score than HE, hypertensive and achalasia groups (p < 0.05), and hypertensive group had more score than DES group (p < 0.05). According to the result of GSI domain, the data revealed that the level of NERD was higher than RE, FH, and HE groups (p < 0.05).

Table 2: Scores in different groups

 RE (n = 63) HE (n = 67) FH (n = 123) NERD (n = 106) Achalasia (n = 50) Hypertensive (n = 10) DES (n = 5) Weak (n = 14) 
SOM 1.39 ± 0.58 1.46 ± 0.62 1.57 ± 0.67 1.40 ± 0.62 1.54 ± 0.66 1.66 ± 0.72 1.20 ± 0.59 1.46 ± 0.90 
O-C 1.50 ± 0.54 1.42 ± 0.64 1.55 ± 0.63 1.50 ± 0.63 1.62 ± 0.73 1.39 ± 0.56 1.94 ± 0.70 1.62 ± 0.73 
I-S 1.43 ± 0.67 1.35 ± 0.66 1.38 ± 0.57 1.40 ± 0.59 1.48 ± 0.71 1.57 ± 0.75 1.20 ± 0.59 1.60 ± 0.69 
DEP* 1.48 ± 0.64 1.51 ± 0.65 1.77 ± 0.59 1.80 ± 0.59 1.76 ± 0.66 1.27 ± 0.54 1.65 ± 0.67 1.61 ± 0.81 
ANX* 1.50 ± 0.60 1.46 ± 0.70 1.69 ± 0.621.70 ± 0.53 1.87 ± 0.66 1.34 ± 0.57 1.57 ± 1.06 1.72 ± 0.73 
HOS 1.44 ± 0.56 1.40 ± 0.62 1.40 ± 0.61 1.39 ± 0.67 1.35 ± 0.56 1.40 ± 0.84 1.20 ± 0.59 1.51 ± 0.75 
PHOB 1.48 ± 0.64 1.47 ± 0.62 1.42 ± 0.58 1.47 ± 0.64 1.56 ± 0.68 1.20 ± 0.57 1.57 ± 1.06 1.37 ± 0.56 
PAR* 1.27 ± 0.49 1.16 ± 0.47 1.27 ± 0.47 1.32 ± 0.57 1.12 ± 0.44 0.96 ± 0.36 0.56 ± 0.51 1.36 ± 0.51 
PSY* 1.26 ± 0.47 1.31 ± 0.53 1.23 ± 0.51 1.27 ± 0.50 1.59 ± 0.57 1.58 ± 0.60 1.67 ± 0.48 1.51 ± 0.50 
GSI* 1.04 ± 0.41 1.01 ± 0.42 1.02 ± 0.38 1.18 ± 0.38 1.07 ± 0.44 1.17 ± 0.47 0.94 ± 0.43 1.11 ± 0.44 

*p < 0.05 between groups

The nine domains with DeMeester pathological (>14.72, n = 114) and normal (<14.72, n = 245) values showed no statistical differences (p > 0.05; Graph 1). However, we found statistically significant differences between the patients with less duration of GERD symptoms (<2 years, n = 95) with those with prolonged GERD duration (>2 years, n = 343). The patients with more duration presented more scores in DEP, ANX, and PSY (p <0.05; Graph 2). But the score of PAR was lower in >2 years group (p < 0.05). Subjects with GERD typical plus atypical symptoms (n = 253) had higher scores compared with subjects only with typical symptoms (n = 185) in SOM, ANX, PSY, and GSI (p < 0.05; Graph 3). Compared with gender, women had dramatically higher scores than men in these nine domains (all p < 0.05; Graph 4).
Graph 1:

SCL-90-R scores based on DeMeester value. No differences were detected in nine domains and GSI between DeMeester value 214.72 and DeMeester value <14.72

Graph 2:

SCL-90-R scores depending on symptom duration. Significant differences were seen in DEP, ANX, PAR, and PSY domains. *p < 0.05

Graph 3:

SCL-90-R scores based on symptom. Significant differences were seen in SOM, ANX, and PSY domains and GSI. *p < 0.05

Graph 4:

SCL-90-R scores based on gender. The scores of females were significantly more than those of males in all domains and GSI. *p < 0.05

SCL-90-R scores based on DeMeester value. No differences were detected in nine domains and GSI between DeMeester value 214.72 and DeMeester value <14.72 SCL-90-R scores depending on symptom duration. Significant differences were seen in DEP, ANX, PAR, and PSY domains. *p < 0.05

DISCUSSION

Psychosocial factors are able to exert influence on deterioration of disease, symptoms, responses to treatment, and the quality of life. Researchers evaluated the psychological status of patients with chronic disease using SCL-90-R questionnaire. A link of GERD and psycho-pathological features has already been demonstrated by several studies.[1415] We analyzed the data from the patients with refractory GERD symptoms in order to acquire their psychological characteristics, which may be helpful for making diagnosis and clinical strategy. SCL-90-R scores based on symptom. Significant differences were seen in SOM, ANX, and PSY domains and GSI. *p < 0.05 SCL-90-R scores based on gender. The scores of females were significantly more than those of males in all domains and GSI. *p < 0.05 In this study, O-S and I-S, which are stable personality characters and are referred as personality, were not found to be statistically significant between these patients. But, differences were found regarding DEP, ANX, PAR, PSY, and GSI domains. The results suggest that the psychological status perhaps does not have close relationship with acid reflux. Remarkably, achalasia showed more psychological factors. Considering that achalasia is an unknown congenital disease, those factors will certainly exist because of refractory GERD symptoms. They probably are the result of symptoms from which patients have suffered for a quite long duration. Taken together, it appears that psychological factors will have a distinct effect on chronic diseases.[51617] With our other comparison results based on DeMeester value, we did not find difference between pathological and normal acid reflux. This strongly supports our suggestion that psychological status does not relate to acid reflux again. Possible reason is that the universal usage of PPIs has effectively controlled acid reflux; therefore, this makes patients benefit from reducing mental stress. A large number of previous studies have revealed that patients with typical symptoms are apt to suffer from atypical GERD symptoms and FGID symptoms.[1819] Also, there is always an overlap between reflux symptoms, irritable bowel syndrome, and functional dyspepsia. The atypical GERD symptoms are closely related to the typical GERD symptoms.[20] Unlike the study of Lee et al[21] that showed that patients with symptomatic RE had more scores than patients with asymptomatic RE on all dimensions of SCL-90-R, we chose patients only with typical GERD symptom to compare with those with typical plus atypical GERD symptom. Our aim was to acquire more precise information about the relationship between mental disorder and GERD symptom. The analysis of symptom duration in this study showed that the patients with more duration had more problems regarding DEP, ANX, and PSY. Considering gender difference, we investigated the data divided by females and males. Our results are consistent with those of Núñez-Rodríguez and Miranda Sivelo[17] that women had dramatically higher scores than men in these nine domains by SCL-90-R. Due to more and more researchers paying attention to gender difference in chronic disease development,[22-24] we assume that the difference between females and males is worthy of further investigations. Regarding the measurement of mental disorders with SCL-90-R, some limitations are also prevailing in this study. The processes including interviewing, diagnosing, and rating were done by experts in our gastroenterology department. Although our research team acquired the assistance of psychologists, the results were likely to have a little bias. Moreover, the samples in this study were regional instead of a being nationally representative. Differences across cities and countries may occur due to differences in sociodemographics. Large-scale multicenter studies need to be carried out in future.
  24 in total

1.  Prevalence of atypical symptoms and their association with typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in Spain.

Authors:  Enrique Rey; Cristina Moreno Elola-Olaso; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo; G Richard Locke; Manuel Díaz-Rubio
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.566

2.  The SCL-90 and the MMPI: a step in the validation of a new self-report scale.

Authors:  L R Derogatis; K Rickels; A F Rock
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 3.  Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; M Fox; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino; W Schwizer; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale--preliminary report.

Authors:  L R Derogatis; R S Lipman; L Covi
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1973-01

5.  Risk of psychiatric disorders following gastroesophageal reflux disease: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Zi-Hong You; Chin-Lin Perng; Li-Yu Hu; Ti Lu; Pan-Ming Chen; Albert C Yang; Shih-Jen Tsai; Yi-Shin Huang; Hon-Jhe Chen
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.487

6.  Comparative analysis between psychological and endoscopic profiles in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective study based on screening endoscopy.

Authors:  Yi-Chia Lee; Hsiu-Po Wang; Han-Mo Chiu; Shih-Cheng Liao; Shih-Pei Huang; Yo-Ping Lai; Ming-Shiang Wu; Ming-Fong Chen; Jaw-Town Lin
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.029

7.  The relationship between existence of typical symptoms and psychological factors in patients with erosive esophagitis.

Authors:  Sang Pyo Lee; Kang Nyeong Lee; Oh Young Lee; Hang Lak Lee; Ho Soon Choi; Byung Chul Yoon; Dae Won Jun; Won Sohn; Seung Chul Cho
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.924

Review 8.  Proton-pump inhibitor therapy in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: putative mechanisms of failure.

Authors:  Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Psychological factors in gastroesophageal reflux disease measured by scl-90-R questionnaire.

Authors:  Ma Henar Núñez-Rodríguez; Alberto Miranda Sivelo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Dyspepsia and IBS symptoms in patients with NERD, ERD and Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Helmut Neumann; Klaus Monkemuller; Arne Kandulski; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.404

View more
  13 in total

1.  Oropharyngeal swallowing functions are impaired in patients with naive-achalasia.

Authors:  Sezgin Baha; Eyigor Sibel; Durusoy Duygu; Karaoguz Ezgi; Kirazli Tayfun; Bor Serhat
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The role of body mass index in determining clinical and quality of life outcomes after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery.

Authors:  Zachary Sanford; Shyam Jayaraman; Adam S Weltz; H Reza Zahiri; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Dynorphin participates in interaction between depression and non-erosive reflux disease.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Bingduo Zhou; Shengquan Fang; Shengliang Zhu; Tingting Xu; Makan Dilikumaer; Guanwu Li
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2022-10-16       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Prevalence and Correlation of Anxiety, Insomnia and Somatic Symptoms in a Chinese Population During the COVID-19 Epidemic.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Huang; Yanxia Wang; Lingyun Zeng; Jiezhi Yang; Xiuli Song; Wenwang Rao; Hehua Li; Yuping Ning; Hongbo He; Ting Li; Kai Wu; Fengjuan Chen; Fengchun Wu; Xiangyang Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Mental Health and Psychosocial Problems of Medical Health Workers during the COVID-19 Epidemic in China.

Authors:  Wen-Rui Zhang; Kun Wang; Lu Yin; Wen-Feng Zhao; Qing Xue; Mao Peng; Bao-Quan Min; Qing Tian; Hai-Xia Leng; Jia-Lin Du; Hong Chang; Yuan Yang; Wei Li; Fang-Fang Shangguan; Tian-Yi Yan; Hui-Qing Dong; Ying Han; Yu-Ping Wang; Fiammetta Cosci; Hong-Xing Wang
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 17.659

6.  The Relationship Between Symptoms of Anxiety and Somatic Symptoms in Health Professionals During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

Authors:  Hehua Li; Yaping Zhang; Honggang Wang; Jing Liang; Yongjie Zhou; Yuanyuan Huang; Tianyi Zhai; Qiong Yang; Mingzhe Yang; Yuping Ning; Hongbo He; Kai Wu; Fengjuan Chen; Fengchun Wu; Xiangyang Zhang
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.570

7.  Associations between Objective and Subjective Housing Status with Individual Mental Health in Guangzhou, China.

Authors:  Lijian Xie; Suhong Zhou; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Profile of the Change in Depression during Proton-Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Influence of the Mucosal Break.

Authors:  Chia-Liang Wu; Chien-Lin Chen; Shu-Hui Wen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Tongue diagnosis indices for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A cross-sectional, case-controlled observational study.

Authors:  Tzu-Chan Wu; Cheng-Nan Lu; Wen-Long Hu; Keng-Liang Wu; John Y Chiang; Jer-Ming Sheen; Yu-Chiang Hung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Mental Health and Work Attitudes among People Resuming Work during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.

Authors:  Lili Song; Yong Wang; ZhengLin Li; Ying Yang; Hao Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.