Literature DB >> 29201514

Does antegrade JJ stenting affect the total operative time during laparoscopic pyeloplasty?

Mustafa Suat Bolat1, Önder Çınar1, Ekrem Akdeniz1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to show the effect of retrograde JJ stenting and intraoperative antegrade JJ stenting techniques on operative time in patients who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 34 patients were retrospectively investigated (15 male and 19 female) with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Of the patients stentized under local anesthesia preoperatively, as a part of surgery, 15 were retrogradely stentized at the beginning of the procedure (Group 1), and 19 were antegradely stentized during the procedure (Group 2). A transperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty technique was performed in all patients. The two groups were retrospectively compared in terms of complications, the mean total operative time, and the mean stenting times.
RESULTS: The mean ages of the patients were 31.5±15.5 and 33.2±15.5 years (p=0.09), and the mean body mass indexes were 25.8±5.6 and 26.2.3±8.4 kg/m2 in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. The mean total operative times were 128.9±38.9 min and 112.7±21.9 min (p=0.04); the mean stenting times were 12.6±5.4 min and 3.5±2.4 min (p=0.02); and the mean rates of catheterization-to-total surgery times were 0.1 and 0.03 (p=0.01) in Group 1 and 2, respectively. The mean hospital stays and the mean anastomosis times were similar between the two groups (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Antegrade JJ stenting during laparoscopic pyeloplasty significantly decreased the total operative time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antegrade stenting; laparoscopic pyeloplasty; operative time; retrograde stenting

Year:  2017        PMID: 29201514      PMCID: PMC5687214          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.77775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  19 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children using needlescopic instrumentation.

Authors:  H L Tan
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative.

Authors:  Brian J Daley; William Cecil; P Chris Clarke; Joseph B Cofer; Oscar D Guillamondegui
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Intraoperative retrograde ureteral stent placement and manipulation during laparoscopic pyeloplasty without need for patient repositioning.

Authors:  Davis P Viprakasit; Hernan O Altamar; Nicole L Miller; S Duke Herrell
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases.

Authors:  C G Eden; D Cahill; J D Allen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Correcting and sharing our complications. Misplacement of pigtail catheter, during a Robot Assisted Pyeloplasty. Clinical findings, diagnosis, possible causes and endoscopic treatment.

Authors:  Konstantinos Stravodimos; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Evangelos Fragkiadis; Stavros Tyritzis; Constantinos A Constantinides
Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl       Date:  2015-07-07

6.  A Modified Antegrade Stenting Technique for Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants and Children.

Authors:  Senad Kalkan; Cevper Ersöz; Abdullah Armagan; Ali İhsan Taşçı; Mesrur Selcuk Silay
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  Neonatal hydronephrosis--the controversy and the management.

Authors:  B M Tripp; Y L Homsy
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Antegrade versus retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Nimalan Arumainayagam; Andrea Minervini; Kim Davenport; Vivekanandan Kumar; Lorenzo Masieri; Sergio Serni; Marco Carini; Anthony G Timoney; Francis X Keeley
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Is antegrade stenting superior to retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty?

Authors:  Anil Mandhani; Shailendra Goel; Mahendra Bhandari
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Is visualising ureter before pyeloplasty necessary in adult patients?

Authors:  M Cakan; F Yalçinkaya; F Demirel; A Satir
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.