Chidambar Kulkarni1, Daniele Di Nuzzo2, E W Meijer1, Stefan C J Meskers1. 1. Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry and Institute of Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology , 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Physics, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB2 1 TN, United Kingdom.
Abstract
The molecular organization in thermally annealed films of poly(9,9-bis((S)-3,7-dimethyloctyl)-2,7-fluorene-alt-benzothiadiazole) is investigated using polarized light. Measurement of linear polarization in transmission and reflection as a function of layer thickness and orientation directly show a left handed cholesteric organization with a pitch length of 600 nm. Results are corroborated by measurements of circularly polarized reflection and generalized ellipsometry and are compared to calculations of the optical properties based on the Maugin-Oseen-DeVries model. For wavelengths near the lowest allowed optical transition, light with the same handedness as the cholesteric arrangement (left) is found to be reflected and transmitted with a probability higher than right circularly polarized light. The high transmission for left polarized light is interpreted as an optical manifestation of the Borrmann effect.
The molecular organization in thermally annealed films of poly(9,9-bis((S)-3,7-dimethyloctyl)-2,7-fluorene-alt-benzothiadiazole) is investigated using polarized light. Measurement of linear polarization in transmission and reflection as a function of layer thickness and orientation directly show a left handed cholesteric organization with a pitch length of 600 nm. Results are corroborated by measurements of circularly polarized reflection and generalized ellipsometry and are compared to calculations of the optical properties based on the Maugin-Oseen-DeVries model. For wavelengths near the lowest allowed optical transition, light with the same handedness as the cholesteric arrangement (left) is found to be reflected and transmitted with a probability higher than right circularly polarized light. The high transmission for left polarized light is interpreted as an optical manifestation of the Borrmann effect.
Π-conjugated molecular materials
find application in optoelectronic
devices, such as light emitting diodes and photovoltaic cells. The
probability for optical transitions in these materials, which is an
important factor controlling the efficiency in light emission and
photovoltaic diodes, can in principle be influenced by the mesoscopic
structure of the material. A periodic variation in the polarizability
of the material with a typical length comparable to the wavelength
of the optical transition of interest, changes the density of photon
states and will affect the probability of spectroscopic transitions
in a limited frequency range. In the extreme case, a photonic bandgap
is established, i.e., in a certain frequency range practically all
photon states are eliminated. The exclusion of photon states prohibits
the absorption and/or emission of photons by the molecule in the material
in the forbidden frequency range. A well-established route to create
such a forbidden energy gap for photons in a particular direction
is the introduction of chiral nematic order.[1,2] Photons
with the same helicity as the molecular cholesteric arrangement are
selectively reflected when their direction of propagation runs parallel
to the axis of the cholesteric.In this study we investigate
thin layers (<400 nm) of an enantiomerically
pure, chiral fluorene-based alternating copolymer,[3,4] poly(9,9-bis((S)-3,7-dimethyloctyl)-2,7-fluorene-alt-benzothiadiazole) 1(5−7) (Mn ca. 5.5 kg/mol, PDI
2.20). This polymer shows liquid crystalline order at elevated temperature.[8,9] Upon rapid cooling, the molecular order in the liquid crystalline
state is vitrified,[10−12] and at room temperature, chiral nematic order is
evidenced by preferential reflection of left circularly polarized
light.[13] Chiroptical properties of 1 and related polymers become very pronounced after thermal
annealing in a liquid crystalline state, inducing long-range structural
order.[14−17] For films of polymer with thicknesses that are relevant for practical
application in light emitting diodes or photovoltaic diodes, few methods
exist to determine the pitch length of the cholesteric arrangement.
The well-known Grandjean–Cano or wedge method does not work
because of the high viscosity of the material. Second, because the
films are relatively thin, no clear selective reflection band can
be observed. Also optical rotation has been used to determine pitch
length, because according to the De Vries theory, optical rotation
should diverge for wavelengths approaching the selective reflection
band. Since often the reflection band cannot be discerned, the viability
of the De Vries description for optical rotation seems questionable.
In this contribution we develop a novel method to determine pitch
length in thin films based on linear dichroism in transmission and
reflection, relying on the strong optical anisotropy of the individual
polymer chains. This work extends the seminal contribution of Chen
and co-workers,[18] who showed that polarized
transmission measurements on a thin film of chiral fluorene nonamers
provide information on handedness and pitch of the cholesteric molecular
arrangement. Making use of this linear dichroism method, we determine
the handedness and pitch of the cholesteric arrangement in a layer
of chiral conjugated polymer. Complementary measurements on the circular
polarization in reflection and optical rotation confirm the handedness.
For aligned, thermally annealed films of 1 we find a
pitch length of around 600 nm which is close to the wavelength of
the lowest allowed absorption band in this material with an onset
around 500 nm. For π–conjugated polymers, the contrast
in dielectric contrast in the direction parallel and perpendicular
to the main chain is large for wavelengths near an optical resonance.
Because the wavelength of the lowest allowed optical transition in
the polymer 1 and its pitch length are comparable, many
of the intriguing optical properties of cholesteric liquid crystals
which are usually only observable in very thick films, now become
apparent already in thin films.
Experimental Section
Synthesis
Synthesis of 1 was carried out
according to a previously reported procedure.[7] However, the crude product was purified according to reported procedures[19,20] to remove palladium(0) catalyst from the polymer.Crude polymer
was dissolved in chloroform (150 mL) and aq. ammonia solution (28–30%,
150 mL) was added and refluxed for 3 h followed by stirring at room
temperature overnight.[19] The organic layer
was separated using a separating funnel and to this was added ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid disodium salt dihydrate (2.1 g) and the solution was stirred
overnight. The organic layer was extracted with water, washed with
brine, dried over sodium sulfate, and evaporated under reduced pressure
to about 10 mL. To this concentrated organic layer, a palladium scavenger,
diethyldithiocarbamic acid diethylammonium salt (60 mg) was added
and stirred under dark and argon atmosphere for 6 h.[11] Then the solution was poured onto cold methanol (300 mL)
and the precipitate was collected by suction filtration and dried
under vacuum at 60 °C overnight. The precipitate was further
subjected to Soxhlet extraction with acetone to remove small oligomers.
The insoluble precipitate was dissolved in minimum amount of THF and
precipitated into cold methanol. The precipitate was filtered and
dried under vacuum at 60 °C overnight to obtain a yellow powder.
Gell Permeation Chromatography
PS standard, THF; Apparent Mn: 5.54 kg mol–1, Mw: 12.24 kg mol–1, PDI (Mw/Mn) = 2.20.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
1H- and 13-C spectra were in accordance with the previous reports.[7]
Film Preparation
A solution of 1 in 9:1
(v/v) chloroform:chlorobenzene was heated in an oil bath at 70 °C
for 2 h and then within an hour was spin-coated (2000 rpm, 60 s, maximum
acceleration) on clean glass slides and rubbed polyimide coated glass
slides. The glass slides were annealed at 150 °C for 15 min under
nitrogen atmosphere (glovebox).[5,21] To obtain films of
different thickness, concentration of 1 was varied from
5 mg/mL to 50 mg/mL. Film thickness at each concentration (5, 7.5,
15, 30, and 50 mg/mL) of 1 was determined for films on
clean glass slides using Dektak 150 Surface Profiler and a similar
thickness was assumed on rubbed polyimide coated glass slides as well.
Polyimide Alignment Layer
2.5 cm × 2.5 cm glass
slides were cleaned by sonication for 10 min each with acetone and
isopropyl alcohol. The glass slides were then etched in a UV-ozone
photoreactor (PR-100) for 30 min. Polyimide (AL 1051) was spin-coated
on etched glass-slides (5000 rpm, 40 s, 500 rpm acceleration) and
then annealed at 180 °C for 90 min. The polyimide facing side
was rubbed on a velvet cloth to induce planar alignment.
Polarized Reflection
and Transmission Measurement
Polarized
reflection and transmission measurement were performed using a Woollam
WVASE ellipsometer using the general Mueller matrix measurement protocol.
Reflection measurement under normal incidence with selection of the
reflected intensity, were done used a home-built setup described earlier.[13,22]
Results and Discussion
In Figure we show
polarized transmission spectra for a thermally annealed film of 1 with a thickness of d = 24 nm on a rubbed
polyimide substrate. Transmission spectra for two different orientations
of the polymer film are shown: one with the rubbing direction of the
underlying alignment layer in the vertical direction and the other
with rubbing direction rotated clockwise over +45° with the vertical
as seen from the light source directly facing the polymer layer. The
minimum in transmission near 460 nm corresponds to electronic excitation
of the polymer chain via the allowed S1 ← S0 electronic transition. This transition is of π–π*
orbital nature and polarized in a direction along the polymer backbone.[23] As expected for the vertically oriented polymer
film, the transmission of light resonant with the electronic transition,
shows strong linear dichroism with vertically polarized (V) incident
light being transmitted with far lower probability that horizontally
polarized (H) incident light. The dichroism is consistent with alignment
of the polymer chains in the direction of rubbing in the polyimide
orientation layer. Also the reflection of the vertically oriented
film is strongly polarized in the vertical direction. If we rotate
the film over +45°, the dichroism for V and H polarized light
in reflection and transmission is strongly reduced. Yet we notice
that for the +45° orientation, H polarized light is transmitted
with lower probability than V. In reflection, H is reflected more
strongly than V for light at resonance with the S1 ←
S0 transition. This shows that in the film oriented +45°,
the orientation of the chains is biased toward the H direction. This
bias can be accounted for by assuming a left-handed cholesteric arrangement
of polymer chains.
Figure 1
(Top) Chemical structure of the polymer 1. (Middle)
Schematic of the direction of the polyimide alignment layer and the
orientation of the transition dipole moments of the π-conjugated
polymer chains in a thin film of annealed polymer. (Bottom) linear
dichroism in transmission and reflection for thermally annealed film
of 1 on rubbed polyimide with the rubbing direction vertical
(left) and rotated over +45° (right) as seen from the light source
with the layer of conjugated polymer directly facing the viewer. Thickness
of the layer of 1: d = 24 nm.
(Top) Chemical structure of the polymer 1. (Middle)
Schematic of the direction of the polyimide alignment layer and the
orientation of the transition dipole moments of the π-conjugated
polymer chains in a thin film of annealed polymer. (Bottom) linear
dichroism in transmission and reflection for thermally annealed film
of 1 on rubbed polyimide with the rubbing direction vertical
(left) and rotated over +45° (right) as seen from the light source
with the layer of conjugated polymer directly facing the viewer. Thickness
of the layer of 1: d = 24 nm.In Figure , we
summarize linearly polarized transmission and reflection measurements
as shown in Figure for films of 1 with various thickness. First we calculate
the maximum extinction (E = −10log T) for the S1 ← S0 band and then compute the degree of linear polarization for V and
H polarizations according to
Figure 2
(Top) Degree of linear polarization in the extinction
of vertically
and horizontally polarized light through annealed and aligned films
of 1 for orientations with rubbing direction vertical
(black line) and rotated +45° (red line) with respect to the
vertical direction as seen from the source with the layer of 1 directly facing the source. Lines show a fit to the data
of eq with pitch =
600 nm. (Middle) Corresponding degree of polarization in reflection
measured at 15° angle of incidence. Lines show a fit to the data
of eq with pitch =
600 nm. (Bottom) Schematic of the left handed cholesteric arrangement
of polymer chains on the alignment layer for three characteristic
thicknesses.
(Top) Degree of linear polarization in the extinction
of vertically
and horizontally polarized light through annealed and aligned films
of 1 for orientations with rubbing direction vertical
(black line) and rotated +45° (red line) with respect to the
vertical direction as seen from the source with the layer of 1 directly facing the source. Lines show a fit to the data
of eq with pitch =
600 nm. (Middle) Corresponding degree of polarization in reflection
measured at 15° angle of incidence. Lines show a fit to the data
of eq with pitch =
600 nm. (Bottom) Schematic of the left handed cholesteric arrangement
of polymer chains on the alignment layer for three characteristic
thicknesses.The degree of polarization
for the films with vertical and with
+45° orientation are shown in the top part of Figure . Clearly for the thinnest
films the degree of polarization is the largest. As the film thickness
increases a damped oscillatory pattern emerges. In order to account
for the measurements we assume simplistically that the extinction
in, say, the V direction is proportional to the square of the component
of the transition dipole moment integrated over the entire thickness
of the film:with d the
thickness of the film, ϕ the angle between the vertical direction
and the local director of the polymer chains film and χ the
angle describing the orientation of the film with χ = 0°
referring the rubbing direction parallel to V. In eq the integration ranges from zero
to ϕtop, i.e., the angle between the director of
the cholesteric at the top surface of the film and the direction of
rubbing of the underlying substrate:Good agreement between experimental data and
predictions from eq can be obtained assuming
a left-handed cholesteric order with a pitch length of 600 nm. To
illustrate this we note that for films with 300 nm thickness the director
of the cholesteric arrangement, makes exactly half a turn when going
from the bottom to the top surface of the film. As a consequence of
this half turn, the dichroism in extinction vanishes for all orientations
of the film, consistent with the experiment.For the linear
polarization in reflection R by
the films of 1, an analysis similar to the one described
above applies. We first introduce the degree of polarization in reflectionNext, we assume
that the linear polarization in reflection is determined
by the orientation of the polymer chains at the top surface of the
polymer film facing the light source.Assuming a pitch length of 600 nm and a left-handed
arrangement,
the dependence of the degree of polarization in reflection on film
thickness can quantitatively be accounted for (see Figure middle).An objection
that may be raised to the above treatment of especially
the linearly polarized reflection data, is that due the left-handed
helical arrangement with pitch length close to the wavelength of observation,
the reflection should be mainly circularly polarized. In order to
investigate the light reflection in more detail, we have resorted
to reflection measurements under exactly normal incidence in which
not only the polarization of the incoming light but also the polarization
of the reflected light can be selected, see Figure .
Figure 3
(a) Schematic of the experimental set up for
measurement of reflection
from a film under normal incidence with selection of both the incoming
and reflected polarization. V vertically linear polarized light, BS
beam splitter, PEM photoelastic modulator. The case of the modulator
at quarter wavelength retardation is shown with left circularly polarized
incident light reflected as left circular polarized light by the cholesteric
film. (b) Degree of linear polarization in reflection for vertically
polarized (V) incident light into V reflected light and horizontally
polarized (H) incident light into H reflected light for an aligned
film of 1 with thickness d = 180 nm
as a function of the rotation angle of the film around the surface
normal. Zero rotation refers to the rubbing direction being vertical.
Positive rotation refers to turning the polymer film in the clockwise
direction as seen from the light source facing the polymer on top
of the rubbed substrate. Wavelength of light: 543 nm. Red curve eq with d = 300 nm and pitch = 600 nm, c) degree of circular polarization
for right circularly polarized (R) incident light into R reflected
light and left circularly polarized (L) incident light into L reflected
light. Dashed blue line shows the average degree of circular polarization
(c) schematic of the director in the 180 nm thick cholesteric film
with a pitch of 600 nm. (e,f, and g) Similar for a 300 nm thick film
of 1.
(a) Schematic of the experimental set up for
measurement of reflection
from a film under normal incidence with selection of both the incoming
and reflected polarization. V vertically linear polarized light, BS
beam splitter, PEM photoelastic modulator. The case of the modulator
at quarter wavelength retardation is shown with left circularly polarized
incident light reflected as left circular polarized light by the cholesteric
film. (b) Degree of linear polarization in reflection for vertically
polarized (V) incident light into V reflected light and horizontally
polarized (H) incident light into H reflected light for an aligned
film of 1 with thickness d = 180 nm
as a function of the rotation angle of the film around the surface
normal. Zero rotation refers to the rubbing direction being vertical.
Positive rotation refers to turning the polymer film in the clockwise
direction as seen from the light source facing the polymer on top
of the rubbed substrate. Wavelength of light: 543 nm. Red curve eq with d = 300 nm and pitch = 600 nm, c) degree of circular polarization
for right circularly polarized (R) incident light into R reflected
light and left circularly polarized (L) incident light into L reflected
light. Dashed blue line shows the average degree of circular polarization
(c) schematic of the director in the 180 nm thick cholesteric film
with a pitch of 600 nm. (e,f, and g) Similar for a 300 nm thick film
of 1.From measurements of
the reflection with vertical polarization
of incident and reflected light and the corresponding measurement
with horizontal incoming and outgoing polarization we calculate the
degree of polarization in reflection according toThis degree of polarization has been measured
for a large number
of different orientations of the polymer film by rotation the film
around its surface normal. In Figure the dependence of the polarization on orientation
is shown for the two thickest aligned films studied. Using eq and simplifying the denominator
in (eq ) to unity, we
expect:The
relationship (eq ) is
illustrated in the left part of Figure for pitch length d = 600
nm.Interestingly, the experimental setup illustrated in Figure can also be used
to measure
the reflection of left circularly (L) polarized light reflected as
L and right circularly polarized light reflected as R. This type of
reflection is characteristic for cholesteric liquid crystals. In contrast,
reflection of circularly polarized light at dielectric interface occurs
with inversion of circular polarization. We define a degree of polarization
for this type of cholesteric reflection:Results for the cholesteric circularly polarized
reflection are
shown in the left part of Figure . We find that cholesteric reflection of left circular
polarized is more efficient that the corresponding reflection of right
circular polarization. Because cholesteric liquid crystals selectively
reflect light with the same helicity as their cholesteric ordering,
these measurements support the conclusion of a left-handed organization
in the films of 1. The variation of the degree of circular
polarization in the reflection with the orientation of the film which
can be observed for the film with 300 nm thickness (Figure c) is currently not understood
and may indicate that the reflected light may actually be polarized
elliptically rather than circularly. In summary, by controlling also
the polarization of the light detected in the reflection, we find
that both linear and circular polarization measurements confirm a
left-handed molecular organization in films of 1.Having now established a firm basis for the assignment of a left-handed
cholesteric arrangement, the question arises naturally whether any
circular selective reflection bands arise. It is well-known that in
thick films of cholesteric liquid crystals of at least several microns,
spectrally quite narrow selective reflection bands occur. In thinner
films, however, the width of these reflection bands broaden.[1] In Figure we present spectrally resolved circular selective reflection
measurements on aligned films of 1. These selectivities
can be extracted out of the so-called Mueller matrix obtained from
generalized ellipsometric measurements. In these experiments the angle
of incidence is 15° and the polarization of the incident light
is controlled and the total (unpolarized) reflected intensity is recorded.
Figure 4
(a) Degree
of circular polarization in reflection R of light by
aligned films of 1 for various thicknesses of the cholesteric
layer in the range 24–300 nm. Angle of incidence: 15°.
(b) Optical rotation of plane polarized light upon transmission through
the film under incidence along the surface normal, averaged over two
orientations of the polymer films (0° and 45°). (c) Degree
of circular polarization in transmission T of light
incident along the surface normal.
(a) Degree
of circular polarization in reflection R of light by
aligned films of 1 for various thicknesses of the cholesteric
layer in the range 24–300 nm. Angle of incidence: 15°.
(b) Optical rotation of plane polarized light upon transmission through
the film under incidence along the surface normal, averaged over two
orientations of the polymer films (0° and 45°). (c) Degree
of circular polarization in transmission T of light
incident along the surface normal.In the left part of Figure we show the degree of circular polarization in reflection
obtained as the 1,4 element of the Mueller matrix, defined according
toAs can be seen, even the thinnest films show preferential
reflection
of left circularly polarized light for wavelengths exceeding the wavelength
of maximum absorption for the S1 ← S0 transition. The degree of polarization in these thin films is however
quite low. For the two thickest films, circular selective reflection
is more pronounced and the typical undulatory pattern of the circular
polarization expected for thin cholesteric films is indeed observed.The handedness and pitch lengths for cholesteric materials have
previously also been estimated from study of the optical rotation
and circular dichroism.[24−26] We now also apply these methods
to the films of 1. In Figure b, the rotation of plane of linearly polarized
light upon transmission through films of 1 under normal
incidence is shown. The optical rotation shown is an average over
two orientation of the film (rubbing direction vertical and at +45°)
and has been obtained from the Mueller matrix for transmission. The
sign of the optical rotation is according to the convention in chemistry.
All film studied show negative optical rotation for wavelengths near
500 nm. Curiously, the optical rotation spectra show no specific feature
in the wavelength region matching the pitch of the cholesteric arrangement.The optical rotation ϕ of cholesteric liquid crystal is usually
interpreted in terms of the De Vries equation. The De Vries equation
for the specific rotation reads:[1]withand q0 = 2π/pitch. Eq is an approximate solution
to the wave equation for electromagnetic waves traveling along the
helical axis in the Maugin–Oseen–DeVries model for a
cholesteric.[27−29] Interestingly the DeVries equation predicts a discontinuity
at the wavelength of the electromagnetic waves inside the medium that
matches the pitch of the chiral nematic. This discontinuity is illustrated
in Figure b by the
red line.
Figure 5
Theoretical predictions for the Maugin–Oseen–DeVries
model based on the exact solutions as described by Good and Karali.
(a) Degree of circular polarization in reflection pRRL (black line) and pRRRLL (blue line). (b) Black line: Optical rotation
of plane polarized light upon transmission through the film under
incidence along the surface normal, averaged over two orientations
of the polymer films (0° and 45°). Red line in the lowest
panel: prediction from real part of eq . (c) Black line: Degree of circular polarization in
transmission. Normal incidence. Red line in lowest panel: Prediction
from imaginary part of eq .
Theoretical predictions for the Maugin–Oseen–DeVries
model based on the exact solutions as described by Good and Karali.
(a) Degree of circular polarization in reflection pRRL (black line) and pRRRLL (blue line). (b) Black line: Optical rotation
of plane polarized light upon transmission through the film under
incidence along the surface normal, averaged over two orientations
of the polymer films (0° and 45°). Red line in the lowest
panel: prediction from real part of eq . (c) Black line: Degree of circular polarization in
transmission. Normal incidence. Red line in lowest panel: Prediction
from imaginary part of eq .The discontinuity in the optical
rotation predicted by eq is not observed in our
experiment. In fact this discontinuity also does not occur in the
exact solution of wave equation for electromagnetic waves as given
by Belyakov[30] and Good and Karali.[31] In Figure we illustrate these exact solutions computed using
an adaptation of the method described by Good and Karali. In the calculations
we use complex dielectric functions determined experimentally from
ellipsometry on thin annealed and unaligned films of 1. Comparing Figures and 4, we notice that the calculated reflection
and optical rotation are in qualitative agreement. The calculations
correctly predict strong thickness dependence of the selective reflectivity
and the optical rotation. The optical rotation according to the exact
solution matches very closely the prediction from the DeVries eq , except for the discontinuity
at the wavelength matching the pitch of the medium. Calculations using
the Good and Karali formalism for films with thickness in the range
of several microns, show features that start to resemble the discontinuity
in optical rotation predicted by eq . We conclude that the DeVries equation does not correctly
predict the optical rotation for thin films in the wavelength range
corresponding to the pitch length.[32]Finally we focus on the circular differential transmission of light
through aligned films of 1. In Figure c the degree of circular polarization in
the transmission of light is shown, defined according:Reasons for studying
transmission rather than the more commonly
used circular differential absorption also known as circular dichroism
are the following. Because of the selective reflection and scattering
of light by the aligned cholesteric material, determining true absorption
and the associated circular differential is complicated and involves
combination of several spectroscopic observables. Circular differential
transmission is well-defined and can be measured directly. The second
reason is a practical one. Commercial circular dichroism spectrometers
are designed, optimized and calibrated to detect very small circular
dichroism signals. The differentials for the materials under study
can, however, be extremely large and partially fall outside the usual
measurement range of the commercial spectrometers. The degree of polarization
in (eq ) equals the
1,4 element of the normalized Mueller matrix in generalized ellipsometry
and the sign of (eq ) is consistent with the sign of the dissymmetry ratio used in circular
dichroism spectroscopy (gabs= 2(AL-AR)/(AL+AR) with A the absorbance).As can be seen in Figure c, the aligned films of 1 all
show a negative
degree of polarization for wavelengths near the maximum in the S1 ← S0 transitions. The degree of polarization
increases rapidly with film thickness. For the thickest film (300
nm), the value for pRLT = −0.8
is close to the theoretical limit for fully selective transmission
of left polarized light, p = −1. The p value for wavelengths just below the lowest allowed transition
is positive, which can be attributed to selective reflection.Up to now, we have interpreted
chiroptical properties of films
of 1 in terms of their mesoscopic chiral nematic molecular
organization.[33−35] In principle, however, also the helicity of individual
polymer chains could contribute to the circular differential signals.[36] In the latter case, because the chiroptical
effects arise from the intramolecular organization, one expects the
degree of circular polarization and the specific optical rotation
are independent of the thickness of this film. Indeed from molecular
chiroptical spectroscopy on dilute solutions, the dissymmetry ratio
and specific optical rotation are known to be intrinsic properties
of the individual molecules. In Figure we have summarized the maxima of the various degrees
of circular polarization as well as the specific optical rotation
for films with different thickness. As can be seen, all these chiroptical
properties show a strong variation with the thickness of the film.
These dependencies, which are in qualitative agreement with the predictions
for the Maugin–Oseen–DeVries model see Figure , indicate that contributions
to the chiroptical properties under study arising from the intrinsic
chiral molecular structure are negligibly small.
Figure 6
Degrees of
polarization p in reflection (a) and
transmission (b) according to eqs , 6, and 13 as a function of film thickness for 1. (c) Specific
optical rotation of films of 1. In (b) and (c) also results
for unaligned, annealed films of 1 are shown as open
red symbols.
Degrees of
polarization p in reflection (a) and
transmission (b) according to eqs , 6, and 13 as a function of film thickness for 1. (c) Specific
optical rotation of films of 1. In (b) and (c) also results
for unaligned, annealed films of 1 are shown as open
red symbols.For wavelengths
near the allowed S1 ← S0 transition we
find that, left circularly polarized light is both
reflected and transmitted with a higher probability than right circularly
polarized light. This implies that the right circularly polarized
light must be absorbed more strongly that left. In contrast, linearly
polarized light with polarization parallel to the direction of the
main chain of the conjugated polymers is reflected with higher probability
than the orthogonal polarization but transmitted with lower probability
by thin films, see Figure . The peculiar anomalous behavior of the circular polarizations
may be interpreted as an optical manifestation of the Borrmann effect.[37,38] The latter effect is known from X-ray spectroscopy and describes
an anomalously low absorption of X-rays in thick crystals when the
crystal is set for a Bragg reflection. In absorbing cholesteric liquid
crystals a related optical effect is known, where upon addition of
an infrared absorbing dopant, the circular polarization which is reflected
with the highest probability in the absence of dopant acquires the
highest transmission coefficient after addition of the absorbing species.[39,40]
Conclusion
The optical properties of thin films of the alternating
fluorenecopolymer 1 with a vitrified chiral nematic order have
been investigated covering linear dichroism in transmission and reflection,
circular differential reflection and transmission as well as optical
rotation. All optical signatures are consistent with a left-handed
cholesteric organization with a pitch length around 600 nm. In contrast
to common belief, we find that even films with thickness an order
of magnitude smaller than the pitch length of the cholesteric arrangement
show preferential reflection of one of the circular polarizations
of light.
Authors: Heong Sub Oh; Sha Liu; HongSub Jee; Alexander Baev; Mark T Swihart; Paras N Prasad Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Daniele Di Nuzzo; Chidambar Kulkarni; Baodan Zhao; Eilam Smolinsky; Francesco Tassinari; Stefan C J Meskers; Ron Naaman; E W Meijer; Richard H Friend Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: James N Wilson; Winfried Steffen; Trent G McKenzie; Günter Lieser; Masao Oda; Dieter Neher; Uwe H F Bunz Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2002-06-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Yanhou Geng; Anita Trajkovska; Sean W Culligan; Jane J Ou; H M Philip Chen; Dimitris Katsis; Shaw H Chen Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2003-11-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jessica Wade; James N Hilfiker; Jochen R Brandt; Letizia Liirò-Peluso; Li Wan; Xingyuan Shi; Francesco Salerno; Seán T J Ryan; Stefan Schöche; Oriol Arteaga; Tamás Jávorfi; Giuliano Siligardi; Cheng Wang; David B Amabilino; Peter H Beton; Alasdair J Campbell; Matthew J Fuchter Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 14.919