Literature DB >> 29199637

Automated 3D bioassembly of micro-tissues for biofabrication of hybrid tissue engineered constructs.

N V Mekhileri1, K S Lim, G C J Brown, I Mutreja, B S Schon, G J Hooper, T B F Woodfield.   

Abstract

Bottom-up biofabrication approaches combining micro-tissue fabrication techniques with extrusion-based 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer scaffolds are emerging strategies in tissue engineering. These biofabrication strategies support native self-assembly mechanisms observed in developmental stages of tissue or organoid growth as well as promoting cell-cell interactions and cell differentiation capacity. Few technologies have been developed to automate the precise assembly of micro-tissues or tissue modules into structural scaffolds. We describe an automated 3D bioassembly platform capable of fabricating simple hybrid constructs via a two-step bottom-up bioassembly strategy, as well as complex hybrid hierarchical constructs via a multistep bottom-up bioassembly strategy. The bioassembly system consisted of a fluidic-based singularisation and injection module incorporated into a commercial 3D bioprinter. The singularisation module delivers individual micro-tissues to an injection module, for insertion into precise locations within a 3D plotted scaffold. To demonstrate applicability for cartilage tissue engineering, human chondrocytes were isolated and micro-tissues of 1 mm diameter were generated utilising a high throughput 96-well plate format. Micro-tissues were singularised with an efficiency of 96.0 ± 5.1%. There was no significant difference in size, shape or viability of micro-tissues before and after automated singularisation and injection. A layer-by-layer approach or aforementioned bottom-up bioassembly strategy was employed to fabricate a bilayered construct by alternatively 3D plotting a thermoplastic (PEGT/PBT) polymer scaffold and inserting pre-differentiated chondrogenic micro-tissues or cell-laden gelatin-based (GelMA) hydrogel micro-spheres, both formed via high-throughput fabrication techniques. No significant difference in viability between the construct assembled utilising the automated bioassembly system and manually assembled construct was observed. Bioassembly of pre-differentiated micro-tissues as well as chondrocyte-laden hydrogel micro-spheres demonstrated the flexibility of the platform while supporting tissue fusion, long-term cell viability, and deposition of cartilage-specific extracellular matrix proteins. This technology provides an automated and scalable pathway for bioassembly of both simple and complex 3D tissue constructs of clinically relevant shape and size, with demonstrated capability to facilitate direct spatial organisation and hierarchical 3D assembly of micro-tissue modules, ranging from biomaterial free cell pellets to cell-laden hydrogel formulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29199637     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa9ef1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  26 in total

1.  A Method for High-Throughput Robotic Assembly of Three-Dimensional Vascular Tissue.

Authors:  Christopher J Nycz; Hannah A Strobel; Kathy Suqui; Jonian Grosha; Gregory S Fischer; Marsha W Rolle
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  New Frontiers for Biofabrication and Bioreactor Design in Microphysiological System Development.

Authors:  Jonathon Parrish; Khoon Lim; Boyang Zhang; Milica Radisic; Tim B F Woodfield
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 3.  Cell Aggregate Assembly through Microengineering for Functional Tissue Emergence.

Authors:  Gozde Eke; Laurence Vaysse; Xi Yao; Mélanie Escudero; Audrey Carrière; Emmanuelle Trevisiol; Christophe Vieu; Christian Dani; Louis Casteilla; Laurent Malaquin
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 7.666

4.  GelMA Hydrogel Reinforced with 3D Printed PEGT/PBT Scaffolds for Supporting Epigenetically-Activated Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cells for Bone Repair.

Authors:  Kenny Man; Cesar Alcala; Naveen V Mekhileri; Khoon S Lim; Lin-Hua Jiang; Tim B F Woodfield; Xuebin B Yang
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-04-10

Review 5.  From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting.

Authors:  Riccardo Levato; Tomasz Jungst; Ruben G Scheuring; Torsten Blunk; Juergen Groll; Jos Malda
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 30.849

6.  Additive manufactured, highly resilient, elastic, and biodegradable poly(ester)urethane scaffolds with chondroinductive properties for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  S Camarero-Espinosa; C Tomasina; A Calore; L Moroni
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2020-04-13

Review 7.  Emulating Human Tissues and Organs: A Bioprinting Perspective Toward Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Ana Clotilde Fonseca; Ferry P W Melchels; Miguel J S Ferreira; Samuel R Moxon; Geoffrey Potjewyd; Tim R Dargaville; Susan J Kimber; Marco Domingos
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 8.  Review on Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing of Drug Delivery Scaffolds for Cell Guidance and Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Aurelio Salerno; Paolo A Netti
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-24

Review 9.  Adult Stem Cells Spheroids to Optimize Cell Colonization in Scaffolds for Cartilage and Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Leandra Santos Baptista; Gabriela Soares Kronemberger; Isis Côrtes; Letícia Emiliano Charelli; Renata Akemi Morais Matsui; Thiago Nunes Palhares; Jerome Sohier; Alexandre Malta Rossi; José Mauro Granjeiro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Advances in Hybrid Fabrication toward Hierarchical Tissue Constructs.

Authors:  Paul D Dalton; Tim B F Woodfield; Vladimir Mironov; Jürgen Groll
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 16.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.