Gregor Seliger1, Katharina Chaoui2, Christian Kunze3, Yasmina Dridi4, Klaus-Vitold Jenderka5, Andreas Wienke6, Michael Tchirikov7. 1. Maternity Clinic / Perinatal Treatment Center University Hospital Halle / Martin Luther University 06120 Halle (Saale) Germany, ST. gregor.seliger@uk-halle.de. 2. Maternity Clinic / Perinatal Treatment Center University Hospital Halle / Martin Luther University Halle (Saale). katharina.chaoui@uk-halle.de. 3. Department of Radiology University Hospital Halle Halle (Saale). christian.kunze@uk-halle.de. 4. Maternity Clinic / Perinatal Treatment Center University Hospital Halle / Martin Luther University Halle (Saale). yasmina.dridi@uk-halle.de. 5. Department of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Applied Sciences Merseburg. klaus.jenderka@hs-merseburg.de. 6. Department of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and computer science Martin Luther University Halle (Saale). andreas.wienke@uk-halle.de. 7. Maternity Clinic / Perinatal Treatment Center University Hospital Halle / Martin Luther University Halle (Saale). michael.tchirikov@uk-halle.de.
Abstract
AIMS: The elastic properties of circumscribed tissues (e.g., tendons, lymph nodes, prostates, brain tumors) are of considerable clinical interest. The purpose of this study was thus to compare the Intra-/Inter-observer variation and accuracy in vitro of point shear wave elastography (pSWE) with that of 2D-SWE and to assess 2D-SWE's precision with variable ROI (vROI) incircumscribed objects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Round targets (Elasticity QA Phantom Model 049) were examined for varying degrees of stiffness (8, 14, 45, and 80 kPa) and diameters (20/10 mm). Three ultrasound systems and four probes were applied (pSWE: Acuson/S3000 9L4/4C1 and Epiq7 C51, 2D-SWE: Aplio/500 PVT375BT). Three different ROIs were used, namely fixed ROI (fROI) and variable ROI: rectangular-best-fitted ROI, and round-best-fitted ROI. Each measurement was performed twice by four observers. RESULTS: A total of 3,604 measurements were conducted. The intra-observer variation of 2D-SWE measurements indicated better agreement (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.971; 95% CI=[0.945; 0.985]), than for the pSWE measurements (ICC = 0.872; 95% CI=[0.794; 0.92]). With both methods, the shear wave elastography applied showed low inter-observer variation: ICC = 0.980; 95% CI=[0.970; 0.987]. However, a significant difference was observed between fROI (pSWE) and vROI (2D-SWE) on circumscribed objects in terms of accuracy. The lowest degree of observationerror was detected in situations where the ROI was not "best fitted", but placed within the target of 3mm from the border (target diameter: 20mm; mean relative error = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: When estimating the elastic properties of circumscribed tissues, the different measurement techniques performed by commercial shear wave elastography systems reveal a strong susceptibility for observational errors, depending upon the fixed vs. variable ROI of the pSWE vs. 2D-SWE technique.
AIMS: The elastic properties of circumscribed tissues (e.g., tendons, lymph nodes, prostates, brain tumors) are of considerable clinical interest. The purpose of this study was thus to compare the Intra-/Inter-observer variation and accuracy in vitro of point shear wave elastography (pSWE) with that of 2D-SWE and to assess 2D-SWE's precision with variable ROI (vROI) incircumscribed objects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Round targets (Elasticity QA Phantom Model 049) were examined for varying degrees of stiffness (8, 14, 45, and 80 kPa) and diameters (20/10 mm). Three ultrasound systems and four probes were applied (pSWE: Acuson/S3000 9L4/4C1 and Epiq7 C51, 2D-SWE: Aplio/500 PVT375BT). Three different ROIs were used, namely fixed ROI (fROI) and variable ROI: rectangular-best-fitted ROI, and round-best-fitted ROI. Each measurement was performed twice by four observers. RESULTS: A total of 3,604 measurements were conducted. The intra-observer variation of 2D-SWE measurements indicated better agreement (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.971; 95% CI=[0.945; 0.985]), than for the pSWE measurements (ICC = 0.872; 95% CI=[0.794; 0.92]). With both methods, the shear wave elastography applied showed low inter-observer variation: ICC = 0.980; 95% CI=[0.970; 0.987]. However, a significant difference was observed between fROI (pSWE) and vROI (2D-SWE) on circumscribed objects in terms of accuracy. The lowest degree of observationerror was detected in situations where the ROI was not "best fitted", but placed within the target of 3mm from the border (target diameter: 20mm; mean relative error = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: When estimating the elastic properties of circumscribed tissues, the different measurement techniques performed by commercial shear wave elastography systems reveal a strong susceptibility for observational errors, depending upon the fixed vs. variable ROI of the pSWE vs. 2D-SWE technique.