| Literature DB >> 29197400 |
Michael Ried1, Maria-Magdalena Eicher2, Reiner Neu2, Zsolt Sziklavari3, Hans-Stefan Hofmann2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is the evaluation of the Masaoka-Koga and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC)/International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) proposal for the new TNM-staging system on clinical implementation and prognosis of thymic malignancies.Entities:
Keywords: Masaoka-Koga; Staging system; TNM staging; Thymic carcinoma; Thymoma
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29197400 PMCID: PMC5712125 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-017-1283-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Stages of thymic tumors according to Masaoka-Koga classification and the proposed IASLC/ITMIG classification [5, 7, 13]
| Stage | Masaoka-Koga | IASCL/ITMIG |
|---|---|---|
| I | Completely encapsulated tumor | T1N0M0 |
| II | (a) Microscopic transcapsular invasion | T2N0M0 |
| III | Invasion into neighboring organ including | (a) T3N0M0 |
| IV | (a) Pleural or pericardial metastases | (a) TanyN1M0, TanyN0M1a |
Patient characteristics
| Variable |
|
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 41 (53.9) |
| Female | 35 (46.1) |
| Age (mean; ±SD) [years] | 52.6 (± 14.3) |
| Myasthenia gravis | 39 (51.3) |
| Type of tumor | |
| Primary mediastinal tumor | 55 (72.4) |
| Pleural tumor spread | 17 (22.4) |
| Mediastinal recurrence | 4 (5.2) |
| WHO classification | |
| A | 2 (2.6) |
| AB | 5 (6.6) |
| B1 | 5 (6.6) |
| B2 | 28 (36.8) |
| Mixed B2/B3 | 8 (10.5) |
| B3 | 18 (23.7) |
| C (thymus carcinoma) | 10 (13.2) |
| Preoperative treatment | |
| None | 43 (56.6) |
| Induction chemotherapy | 28 (36.8) |
| Octreotid/prednisone | 5 (6.6) |
| Radiotherapy | 0 (0) |
SD standard deviation, WHO World Health Organization
Operative and postoperative data
| Variable |
|
|---|---|
| Surgery | |
| One approach | 41 (53.9) |
| Two approaches | 35 (46.1) |
| Surgical procedure | |
| Radical thymectomy | 61 (18.3) |
| P/D | 12 (15.8) |
| eP/D | 10 (13.2) |
| EPP | 3 (3.9) |
| HITHOC | 19 (25) |
| Completeness of resection | |
| R0 | 37 (48.7) |
| R1 | 28 (36.8) |
| R2 | 11 (14.5) |
| Complications | |
| Intraoperative | 3 (3.9) |
| Postoperative | 10 (13.2) |
| Adjuvant treatment | |
| Chemotherapy | 22 (28.9) |
| Radiotherapy | 19 (25) |
| 30-day mortality | 0 (0) |
eP/D extended pleurectomy/decortication, EPP extrapleural pneumonectomy, HITHOC hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy, P/D pleurectomy/decortication, R0 no residual tumor, R1 microscopic residual tumor, R2 macroscopic residual tumor
Patient distribution (n) between proposed IASLC/ITMIG stages and Masaoka-Koga classification
| IASLC/ITMIG stages | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | IIIa | IIIb | IVa | IVb | |||
| Masaoka-Koga | I | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| IIa | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| IIb | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| III | 0 | 1 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 20 | |
| IVa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 28 | |
| IVb | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| Total | 23 | 1 | 15 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 76 | |
Patient distribution (n) between proposed IASLC/ITMIG stages and WHO classification
| IASLC/ITMIG stages | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | IIIa | IIIb | IVa | IVb | |||
| WHO | A | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| AB | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | |
| B1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | |
| B2 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 28 | |
| Mixed B2/B3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8 | |
| B3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 18 | |
| C | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| Total | 23 | 1 | 15 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 76 | |
Fig. 1The number of patients in each subgroup is presented as well as the 5-year survival rate [%]. a Significant differences in survival were documented with respect to three groups of Masaoka-Koga stages. Stage III patients had a lower survival than patients with stage IV. b Survival curves with respect to the proposed IASLC/ITMIG stages showed also significant differences
Fig. 2Recurrence-free survival curves for patient subgroups according to the three stage groupings. There were significant differences between stage I + II compared to stage III or stage IV with respect to the Masaoka-Koga (a) and the proposed IASLC/ITMIG (b) staging system. Recurrence-free survival was nearly similar between stage III and stage IV
Comparison of hazard ratios between Masaoka-Koga and proposed IASLC/ITMIG stages using Cox’s regression analysis
| Overall survival | Recurrence-free survival | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI |
| HR | 95% CI |
| |
| Masaoka-Koga | ||||||
| I + II | 1.00 | 0.054 | 1.00 | 0.03 | ||
| III | 6.38 | 1.38–29.59 | 0.02 | 5.79 | 1.19–28.01 | 0.03 |
| IVa + IVb | 3.64 | 0.75–17.67 | 0.11 | 8.1 | 1.78–36.79 | 0.007 |
| IASLC/ITMIG | ||||||
| I + II | 1.00 | 0.09 | 1.00 | 0.04 | ||
| IIIa + IIIb | 5.71 | 1.19–27.49 | 0.03 | 3.66 | 0.91–14.67 | 0.07 |
| IVa + IVb | 4.73 | 1.01–22.1 | 0.048 | 5.31 | 1.47–19.15 | 0.01 |
CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio