Literature DB >> 29196772

Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task.

Elena Krugliakova1, Vasily Klucharev2, Tommaso Fedele3, Alexey Gorin2, Aleksandra Kuznetsova2, Anna Shestakova2.   

Abstract

Reflecting the discrepancy between received and predicted outcomes, the reward prediction error (RPE) plays an important role in learning in a dynamic environment. A number of studies suggested that the feedback-related negativity (FRN) component of an event-related potential, known to be associated with unexpected outcomes, encodes RPEs. While FRN was clearly shown to be sensitive to the probability of outcomes, the effect of outcome magnitude on FRN remains to be further clarified. In studies on the neural underpinnings of reward anticipation and outcome evaluation, a monetary incentive delay (MID) task proved to be particularly useful. We investigated whether feedback-locked FRN and cue-locked dN200 responses recorded during an auditory MID task were sensitive to the probability and magnitude of outcomes. The cue-locked dN200 is associated with the update of information about the magnitude of prospective outcomes. Overall, we showed that feedback-locked FRN was modulated by both the magnitude and the probability of outcomes during an auditory version of MID task, whereas no such effect was found for cue-locked dN200. Furthermore, the cue-locked dN200, which is associated with the update of information about the magnitude of prospective outcomes, correlated with the standard feedback-locked FRN, which is associated with a negative RPE. These results further expand our knowledge on the interplay between the processing of predictive cues that forecast future outcomes and the subsequent revision of these predictions during outcome delivery.

Keywords:  Electroencephalography; Feedback-related negativity; Monetary incentive delay task; N200

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29196772     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5113-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  50 in total

1.  Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  J O'Doherty; M L Kringelbach; E T Rolls; J Hornak; C Andrews
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.

Authors:  Christian Bellebaum; David Polezzi; Irene Daum
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Error-related negativities elicited by monetary loss and cues that predict loss.

Authors:  Jonathan P Dunning; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  A model for stimulus generalization and discrimination.

Authors:  R R BUSH; F MOSTELLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Differential patterns of nucleus accumbens activation during anticipation of monetary and social reward in young and older adults.

Authors:  Lena Rademacher; Aallaa Salama; Gerhard Gründer; Katja N Spreckelmeyer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  The feedback-related negativity signals salience prediction errors, not reward prediction errors.

Authors:  Deborah Talmi; Ryan Atkinson; Wael El-Deredy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Simulation of anticipatory responses in classical conditioning by a neuron-like adaptive element.

Authors:  A G Barto; R S Sutton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The reward positivity: from basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak Proudfit
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task Induces Changes in Sensory Processing: ERP Evidence.

Authors:  Elena Krugliakova; Alexey Gorin; Tommaso Fedele; Yury Shtyrov; Victoria Moiseeva; Vasily Klucharev; Anna Shestakova
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Cortical plasticity elicited by acoustically cued monetary losses: an ERP study.

Authors:  Aleksei Gorin; Elena Krugliakova; Vadim Nikulin; Aleksandra Kuznetsova; Victoria Moiseeva; Vasily Klucharev; Anna Shestakova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Differential effects of real versus hypothetical monetary reward magnitude on risk-taking behavior and brain activity.

Authors:  Sihua Xu; Yu Pan; Zhe Qu; Zhuo Fang; Zijing Yang; Fan Yang; Fenghua Wang; Hengyi Rao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.