O-Sung Lee1, Yong Seuk Lee1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of referencing system on posterior condylar offset (PCO) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. Moreover, there is a lack of concern about the anterior flange-bone contact according to the referencing system. METHODS:One hundred four TKAs using the anterior referencing (AR) system and 107 TKAs using the posterior referencing (PR) system were analyzed with 2-year follow-up. The PCO, PCO ratio (PCOR), and contact at the anterior flange-bone interface were compared between the 2 groups. The flexion and extension gaps and the degree of medial release were measured, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Finally, the correlation between changes in PCO and knee flexion angle was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean postoperative PCO and PCOR were significantly larger in the PR group than in the AR group. Incomplete contact between the anterior flange and anterior femur occurred more frequently in the AR group than in the PR group (48.1% vs 13.1%, P < .001). The medial and lateral flexion gaps were significantly larger in the AR group than in the PR group. The groups showed no differences in soft tissue release, degree of flexion, and clinical scores. In both groups, there was no correlation between postoperative change of PCO and improvement in flexion. CONCLUSION: The PR system produced larger PCO and PCOR, and smaller flexion gap compared to the AR system. Additionally, the PR group showed more favorable contact between the anterior flange and anterior femur. However, these differences were not related to the degree of soft tissue release and clinical outcomes.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The effect of referencing system on posterior condylar offset (PCO) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. Moreover, there is a lack of concern about the anterior flange-bone contact according to the referencing system. METHODS: One hundred four TKAs using the anterior referencing (AR) system and 107 TKAs using the posterior referencing (PR) system were analyzed with 2-year follow-up. The PCO, PCO ratio (PCOR), and contact at the anterior flange-bone interface were compared between the 2 groups. The flexion and extension gaps and the degree of medial release were measured, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Finally, the correlation between changes in PCO and knee flexion angle was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean postoperative PCO and PCOR were significantly larger in the PR group than in the AR group. Incomplete contact between the anterior flange and anterior femur occurred more frequently in the AR group than in the PR group (48.1% vs 13.1%, P < .001). The medial and lateral flexion gaps were significantly larger in the AR group than in the PR group. The groups showed no differences in soft tissue release, degree of flexion, and clinical scores. In both groups, there was no correlation between postoperative change of PCO and improvement in flexion. CONCLUSION: The PR system produced larger PCO and PCOR, and smaller flexion gap compared to the AR system. Additionally, the PR group showed more favorable contact between the anterior flange and anterior femur. However, these differences were not related to the degree of soft tissue release and clinical outcomes.