Literature DB >> 29194534

Why not try harder? Computational approach to motivation deficits in neuro-psychiatric diseases.

Mathias Pessiglione1,2, Fabien Vinckier1,2,3, Sébastien Bouret1,2, Jean Daunizeau1,2, Raphaël Le Bouc1,2,4.   

Abstract

Motivation deficits, such as apathy, are pervasive in both neurological and psychiatric diseases. Even when they are not the core symptom, they reduce quality of life, compromise functional outcome and increase the burden for caregivers. They are currently assessed with clinical scales that do not give any mechanistic insight susceptible to guide therapeutic intervention. Here, we present another approach that consists of phenotyping the behaviour of patients in motivation tests, using computational models. These formal models impose a precise and operational definition of motivation that is embedded in decision theory. Motivation can be defined as the function that orients and activates the behaviour according to two attributes: a content (the goal) and a quantity (the goal value). Decision theory offers a way to quantify motivation, as the cost that patients would accept to endure in order to get the benefit of achieving their goal. We then review basic and clinical studies that have investigated the trade-off between the expected cost entailed by potential actions and the expected benefit associated with potential rewards. These studies have shown that the trade-off between effort and reward involves specific cortical, subcortical and neuromodulatory systems, such that it may be shifted in particular clinical conditions, and reinstated by appropriate treatments. Finally, we emphasize the promises of computational phenotyping for clinical purposes. Ideally, there would be a one-to-one mapping between specific neural components and distinct computational variables and processes of the decision model. Thus, fitting computational models to patients' behaviour would allow inferring of the dysfunctional mechanism in both cognitive terms (e.g. hyposensitivity to reward) and neural terms (e.g. lack of dopamine). This computational approach may therefore not only give insight into the motivation deficit but also help personalize treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29194534     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  35 in total

1.  Emotional content impacts how executive function ability relates to willingness to wait and to work for reward.

Authors:  Katherine S F Damme; Nicholas J Kelley; Meghan E Quinn; James E Glazer; Iris Ka-Yi Chat; Katherine S Young; Robin Nusslock; Richard Zinbarg; Susan Bookheimer; Michelle G Craske
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Can't or Won't? Immunometabolic Constraints on Dopaminergic Drive.

Authors:  Michael T Treadway; Jessica A Cooper; Andrew H Miller
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Effortful goal-directed behavior in schizophrenia: Computational subtypes and associations with cognition.

Authors:  Jessica A Cooper; Deanna M Barch; L Felice Reddy; William P Horan; Michael F Green; Michael T Treadway
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2019-07-08

4.  Preserved Unconscious Processing in Schizophrenia: The Case of Motivation.

Authors:  Lucie Berkovitch; Raphaël Gaillard; Pierre Abdel-Ahad; Sarah Smadja; Claire Gauthier; David Attali; Hadrien Beaucamps; Marion Plaze; Mathias Pessiglione; Fabien Vinckier
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 7.348

5.  Value, confidence, deliberation: a functional partition of the medial prefrontal cortex demonstrated across rating and choice tasks.

Authors:  Nicolas Clairis; Mathias Pessiglione
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 6.  The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued.

Authors:  Michael Inzlicht; Amitai Shenhav; Christopher Y Olivola
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  The neuroanatomical and neurochemical basis of apathy and impulsivity in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  L Passamonti; C J Lansdall; J B Rowe
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-08

8.  Aging Increases Prosocial Motivation for Effort.

Authors:  Patricia L Lockwood; Ayat Abdurahman; Anthony S Gabay; Daniel Drew; Marin Tamm; Masud Husain; Matthew A J Apps
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-04-16

9.  Apathy in small vessel cerebrovascular disease is associated with deficits in effort-based decision making.

Authors:  Youssuf Saleh; Campbell Le Heron; Pierre Petitet; Michele Veldsman; Daniel Drew; Olivia Plant; Ursula Schulz; Arjune Sen; Peter M Rothwell; Sanjay Manohar; Masud Husain
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 15.255

10.  Anticipatory energization revealed by pupil and brain activity guides human effort-based decision making.

Authors:  Irma T Kurniawan; Marcus Grueschow; Christian C Ruff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.