Literature DB >> 29477776

The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued.

Michael Inzlicht1, Amitai Shenhav2, Christopher Y Olivola3.   

Abstract

According to prominent models in cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and economics, effort (be it physical or mental) is costly: when given a choice, humans and non-human animals alike tend to avoid effort. Here, we suggest that the opposite is also true and review extensive evidence that effort can also add value. Not only can the same outcomes be more rewarding if we apply more (not less) effort, sometimes we select options precisely because they require effort. Given the increasing recognition of effort's role in motivation, cognitive control, and value-based decision-making, considering this neglected side of effort will not only improve formal computational models, but also provide clues about how to promote sustained mental effort across time.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive control; cognitive dissonance; decision-making; effort; learned industriousness; need for cognition; value

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29477776      PMCID: PMC6172040          DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  77 in total

1.  Scale-invariance as a unifying psychological principle.

Authors:  N Chater; G D Brown
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-01-01

2.  Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science?

Authors:  Nick Chater; Paul Vitányi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  I endeavor to make it: effort increases valuation of subsequent monetary reward.

Authors:  Qingguo Ma; Liang Meng; Lei Wang; Qiang Shen
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Neural mechanisms underlying the impact of daylong cognitive work on economic decisions.

Authors:  Bastien Blain; Guillaume Hollard; Mathias Pessiglione
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The road to heaven is paved with effort: Perceived effort amplifies moral judgment.

Authors:  Yochanan E Bigman; Maya Tamir
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-10-13

6.  Effort increases sensitivity to reward and loss magnitude in the human brain.

Authors:  Julen Hernandez Lallement; Katarina Kuss; Peter Trautner; Bernd Weber; Armin Falk; Klaus Fliessbach
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Jonathan D Cohen; Matthew M Botvinick
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Self-inflicted pain out of boredom.

Authors:  Chantal Nederkoorn; Linda Vancleef; Alexandra Wilkenhöner; Laurence Claes; Remco C Havermans
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  The Martyrdom Effect: When Pain and Effort Increase Prosocial Contributions.

Authors:  Christopher Y Olivola; Eldar Shafir
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2011-12-22

10.  Striatal activity underlies novelty-based choice in humans.

Authors:  Bianca C Wittmann; Nathaniel D Daw; Ben Seymour; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  64 in total

Review 1.  Moving towards specificity: A systematic review of cue features associated with reward and punishment in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Ann F Haynos; Jason M Lavender; Jillian Nelson; Scott J Crow; Carol B Peterson
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-05-27

2.  Young children consider the expected utility of others' learning to decide what to teach.

Authors:  Sophie Bridgers; Julian Jara-Ettinger; Hyowon Gweon
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-10-14

3.  Shifts in attentional scope modulate event-related potentials evoked by reward.

Authors:  Ajay Nadig; Nicholas J Kelley; Narun Pornpattananangkul; James E Glazer; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Task duration and task order do not matter: no effect on self-control performance.

Authors:  Wanja Wolff; Vanda Sieber; Maik Bieleke; Chris Englert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-07-18

5.  Does intrinsic reward motivate cognitive control? a naturalistic-fMRI study based on the synchronization theory of flow.

Authors:  Richard Huskey; Britney Craighead; Michael B Miller; René Weber
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  The volatile nature of positive affect effects: opposite effects of positive affect and time on task on proactive control.

Authors:  Carmen Hefer; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-04

7.  An Eye for an Eye: Neural Correlates of the Preference for Punishment-Based Justice.

Authors:  Samantha J Fede; Joshua L Gowin; Peter Manza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  After-effects of self-control: The reward responsivity hypothesis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Kelley; Anna J Finley; Brandon J Schmeichel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  From likely to likable: The role of statistical typicality in human social assessment of faces.

Authors:  Chaitanya K Ryali; Stanny Goffin; Piotr Winkielman; Angela J Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Surprise, value and control in anterior cingulate cortex during speeded decision-making.

Authors:  Eliana Vassena; James Deraeve; William H Alexander
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.