Literature DB >> 29193879

Organ Bioprinting: Are We There Yet?

Guifang Gao1,2, Ying Huang1, Arndt F Schilling3, Karen Hubbell2,4, Xiaofeng Cui1,2,4.   

Abstract

About 15 years ago, bioprinting was coined as one of the ultimate solutions to engineer vascularized tissues, which was impossible to accomplish using the conventional tissue fabrication approaches. With the advances of 3D-printing technology during the past decades, one may expect 3D bioprinting being developed as much as 3D printing. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The printing principles of bioprinting are dramatically different from those applied in industrialized 3D printing, as they have to take the living components into account. While the conventional 3D-printing technologies are actually applied for biological or biomedical applications, true 3D bioprinting involving direct printing of cells and other biological substances for tissue reconstruction is still in its infancy. In this progress report, the current status of bioprinting in academia and industry is subjectively evaluated. The progress made is acknowledged, and the existing bottlenecks in bioprinting are discussed. Recent breakthroughs from a variety of associated fields, including mechanical engineering, robotic engineering, computing engineering, chemistry, material science, cellular biology, molecular biology, system control, and medicine may overcome some of these current bottlenecks. For this to happen, a convergence of these areas into a systemic research area "3D bioprinting" is needed to develop bioprinting as a viable approach for creating fully functional organs for standard clinical diagnosis and treatment including transplantation.
© 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Keywords:  3D printing; biomaterials; bioprinting; tissue engineering; vascularization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29193879     DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201701018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater        ISSN: 2192-2640            Impact factor:   9.933


  11 in total

Review 1.  Multi-dimensional printing in thoracic surgery: current and future applications.

Authors:  Jackson K S Kwok; Rainbow W H Lau; Ze-Rui Zhao; Peter S Y Yu; Jacky Y K Ho; Simon C Y Chow; Innes Y P Wan; Calvin S H Ng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Scaffolds in the microbial resistant era: Fabrication, materials, properties and tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Ángel Serrano-Aroca; Alba Cano-Vicent; Roser Sabater I Serra; Mohamed El-Tanani; AlaaAA Aljabali; Murtaza M Tambuwala; Yogendra Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-08-30

3.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinted Controlled Release Scaffold Containing Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Lyosecretome for Bone Regeneration: Sterile Manufacturing and In Vitro Biological Efficacy.

Authors:  Elia Bari; Franca Scocozza; Sara Perteghella; Lorena Segale; Marzio Sorlini; Ferdinando Auricchio; Michele Conti; Maria Luisa Torre
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-03

4.  Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress.

Authors:  Sara Cristina Pedroza-González; Marisela Rodriguez-Salvador; Baruc Emet Pérez-Benítez; Mario Moisés Alvarez; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-04-20

Review 5.  Recent advances in microarray 3D bioprinting for high-throughput spheroid and tissue culture and analysis.

Authors:  Sunil Shrestha; Vinod Kumar Reddy Lekkala; Prabha Acharya; Darshita Siddhpura; Moo-Yeal Lee
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 7.258

6.  The Osteocyte Stimulated by Wnt Agonist SKL2001 Is a Safe Osteogenic Niche Improving Bioactivities in a Polycaprolactone and Cell Integrated 3D Module.

Authors:  Yangxi Liu; Xiaojie Ruan; Jun Li; Bo Wang; Jie Chen; Xiaofang Wang; Pengtao Wang; Xiaolin Tu
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 7.  Halfway between 2D and Animal Models: Are 3D Cultures the Ideal Tool to Study Cancer-Microenvironment Interactions?

Authors:  Jessica Hoarau-Véchot; Arash Rafii; Cyril Touboul; Jennifer Pasquier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Adapting the 14-day rule for embryo research to encompass evolving technologies.

Authors:  Kate Williams; Martin H Johnson
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2020-01-21

9.  What would you like to print? Students' opinions on the use of 3D printing technology in medicine.

Authors:  Renata Wilk; Wirginia Likus; Andrzej Hudecki; Marita Syguła; Aleksandra Różycka-Nechoritis; Konstantinos Nechoritis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Development of 3D bioprinting: From printing methods to biomedical applications.

Authors:  Zeming Gu; Jianzhong Fu; Hui Lin; Yong He
Journal:  Asian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 6.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.