Literature DB >> 29193180

Considerations for analysis of time-to-event outcomes measured with error: Bias and correction with SIMEX.

Eric J Oh1, Bryan E Shepherd2, Thomas Lumley3, Pamela A Shaw1.   

Abstract

For time-to-event outcomes, a rich literature exists on the bias introduced by covariate measurement error in regression models, such as the Cox model, and methods of analysis to address this bias. By comparison, less attention has been given to understanding the impact or addressing errors in the failure time outcome. For many diseases, the timing of an event of interest (such as progression-free survival or time to AIDS progression) can be difficult to assess or reliant on self-report and therefore prone to measurement error. For linear models, it is well known that random errors in the outcome variable do not bias regression estimates. With nonlinear models, however, even random error or misclassification can introduce bias into estimated parameters. We compare the performance of 2 common regression models, the Cox and Weibull models, in the setting of measurement error in the failure time outcome. We introduce an extension of the SIMEX method to correct for bias in hazard ratio estimates from the Cox model and discuss other analysis options to address measurement error in the response. A formula to estimate the bias induced into the hazard ratio by classical measurement error in the event time for a log-linear survival model is presented. Detailed numerical studies are presented to examine the performance of the proposed SIMEX method under varying levels and parametric forms of the error in the outcome. We further illustrate the method with observational data on HIV outcomes from the Vanderbilt Comprehensive Care Clinic.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox model; SIMEX; accelerated failure time; measurement error; survival analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29193180      PMCID: PMC5810403          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  21 in total

1.  Attenuation of treatment effect due to measurement variability in assessment of progression-free survival.

Authors:  S Hong; N Schmitt; A Stone; J Denne
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 1.894

2.  Measurement error in covariates in the marginal hazards model for multivariate failure time data.

Authors:  Wendy F Greene; Jianwen Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Accelerated failure time models with covariates subject to measurement error.

Authors:  Wenqing He; Grace Y Yi; Juan Xiong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Accounting for data errors discovered from an audit in multiple linear regression.

Authors:  Bryan E Shepherd; Chang Yu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A general method for dealing with misclassification in regression: the misclassification SIMEX.

Authors:  Helmut Küchenhoff; Samuel M Mwalili; Emmanuel Lesaffre
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Estimating the parameters in the Cox model when covariate variables are measured with error.

Authors:  P Hu; A A Tsiatis; M Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The role of frailty models and accelerated failure time models in describing heterogeneity due to omitted covariates.

Authors:  N Keiding; P K Andersen; J P Klein
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Accounting for misclassified outcomes in binary regression models using multiple imputation with internal validation data.

Authors:  Jessie K Edwards; Stephen R Cole; Melissa A Troester; David B Richardson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  EVALUATING RISK-PREDICTION MODELS USING DATA FROM ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS.

Authors:  L E Wang; Pamela A Shaw; Hansie M Mathelier; Stephen E Kimmel; Benjamin French
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  Measuring the quality of observational study data in an international HIV research network.

Authors:  Stephany N Duda; Bryan E Shepherd; Cynthia S Gadd; Daniel R Masys; Catherine C McGowan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Multiple-Imputation Variance Estimation in Studies With Missing or Misclassified Inclusion Criteria.

Authors:  Mark J Giganti; Bryan E Shepherd
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Errors in multiple variables in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) cohort and electronic health record data: statistical challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Bryan E Shepherd; Pamela A Shaw
Journal:  Stat Commun Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-07

3.  Sequence of flexion contracture development in the lower limb: a longitudinal analysis of 1,071 children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Erika Cloodt; Anna Lindgren; Henrik Lauge-Pedersen; Elisabet Rodby-Bousquet
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 4.  The Measurement Error Elephant in the Room: Challenges and Solutions to Measurement Error in Epidemiology.

Authors:  Gabriel K Innes; Fiona Bhondoekhan; Bryan Lau; Alden L Gross; Derek K Ng; Alison G Abraham
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 5.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 1-Basic theory and simple methods of adjustment.

Authors:  Ruth H Keogh; Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Helmut Küchenhoff; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Victor Kipnis; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Raking and regression calibration: Methods to address bias from correlated covariate and time-to-event error.

Authors:  Eric J Oh; Bryan E Shepherd; Thomas Lumley; Pamela A Shaw
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Improved generalized raking estimators to address dependent covariate and failure-time outcome error.

Authors:  Eric J Oh; Bryan E Shepherd; Thomas Lumley; Pamela A Shaw
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 1.715

8.  Robust methods to correct for measurement error when evaluating a surrogate marker.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Tanya P Garcia; Ross L Prentice; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.701

9.  Individual Characteristics as Prognostic Factors of the Evolution of Hospitalized COVID-19 Romanian Patients: A Comparative Observational Study between the First and Second Waves Based on Gaussian Graphical Models and Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Alexandra Mocanu; Gratiela Georgiana Noja; Alin Viorel Istodor; Georgiana Moise; Marius Leretter; Laura-Cristina Rusu; Adina Maria Marza; Alexandru Ovidiu Mederle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.