| Literature DB >> 29193022 |
S Carpinteri1, S Sampurno1, J Malaterre1,2, R Millen1, M Dean1,3, J Kong1, T Chittleborough1, A Heriot1,3, A C Lynch1,3, R G Ramsay1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to monitor the effect of humidified-warm carbon dioxide (HWCO2 ) delivered into the open abdomen of mice, simulating laparotomy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29193022 PMCID: PMC5901019 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Surg ISSN: 0007-1323 Impact factor: 6.939
Figure 1Laparotomy set‐up using four retractors, intubation tube, PhysioSuite® monitor and rectal probe: a control mouse and b mouse with carbon dioxide diffuser (arrow). Humidified‐warm carbon dioxide is delivered via the diffuser throughout the 1‐h procedure
Figure 2Core temperature monitoring over time in control (no carbon dioxide) and humidified‐warm carbon dioxide (HWCO2) groups (18 in each group). Normal body temperature range for mice shown by dotted lines. Values are mean(s.d.). P < 0·001 for mean temperature of both cohorts (2‐way ANOVA)
Figure 3Percentage perfusion at the mouse paw in control (no carbon dioxide) and humidified‐warm carbon dioxide (HWCO2) groups (18 in each group). Values are plotted for each animal and mean(s.d.) values are also shown. P = 0·002 (2‐way t test)
Figure 4a Illustration depicting a normal peritoneal cell with cellular junctions (orange and blue) along with normal microvilli (black arrow). Damaged microvilli (blue arrow) and delaminating/bulging mesothelial cells (red arrow) are also illustrated, and exposure of the basement membrane (BM). b Representative scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of peritoneal surface at 24 h after laparotomy in control (no carbon dioxide) and humidified‐warm carbon dioxide (HWCO2) groups (scale bar 20 μm). c Higher‐power SEM images in both groups; cell bulging was apparent in the control group (scale bar 10 μm). d,e Quantification of retracted and/or bulged mesothelial cells (d) and structural defects in microvilli (e). Values are mean(s.d.) extent of damage (9 per group). *P < 0·050 (2‐way t test)
Figure 5Effect of humidified–warm carbon dioxide (HWCO2) on simulated surgery damage at 24 h after laparotomy. a Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images from both groups; mesothelial bulging and delamination was reduced by the use of HWCO2 (scale bar 20 μm). b Higher‐magnification SEM images of peritoneal surface in both groups (scale bar 10 μm). c,d Quantification of retracted and/or bulged mesothelial cells (c) and structural defects in microvilli (d). Values are mean(s.d.) (9 per group). *P < 0·050 (2‐way t test)
Figure 6Effect of humidified‐warm carbon dioxide (HWCO2) on markers of hypoxia at 24 h after laparotomy. a–c Matched immunohistochemical (IHC) images showing expression of nuclear hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) 1α (a) and cyclo‐oxygenase (COX) 2 expression (b) in the peritoneum, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A staining of damaged peritoneum (c) in control (no carbon dioxide) and HWCO2 groups (scale bar 50 μm). d–f Histological scores (H‐scores) for IHC staining of HIF‐1α, (d) COX‐2 (e) and VEGF‐A (f). Dotted lines indicate basal expression of each marker in mice subjected to anaesthesia but no surgery. Values are mean(s.d.) (9 per group). *P < 0·050 (2‐way t test)
Figure 7Sustained tissue changes assessed at 10 days after laparotomy in control (no carbon dioxide) and humidified‐warm carbon dioxide (HWCO2) groups in the absence or presence of damage caused by simulated surgery: a retracted and/or bulged mesothelial cells and b structural defects in microvilli. Values are mean(s.d.) (9 per group). *P < 0·050 (2‐way t test)