Stacey B Scott1, Elizabeth Munoz2, Jacqueline A Mogle3, Alyssa A Gamaldo4, Joshua M Smyth5, David M Almeida6, Martin J Sliwinski7. 1. Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, USA. Electronic address: stacey.scott@stonybrook.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, University of California-Riverside, USA. Electronic address: elizabeth.munozdiaz@ucr.edu. 3. School of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, USA. Electronic address: jam935@psu.edu. 4. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, USA. Electronic address: aag46@psu.edu. 5. Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, USA. Electronic address: jms1187@psu.edu. 6. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, USA. Electronic address: dma18@psu.edu. 7. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, USA. Electronic address: mjs56@psu.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Neighborhood characteristics may influence health and well-being outcomes through stressors in daily life. OBJECTIVES: This study tested whether a varied set of perceived characteristics of neighborhood (i.e., social cohesion, safety, aesthetic quality, violence) predicted stressor frequency and severity as well as negative emotional responses to stressors. We predicted greater reported cohesion and safety and less violence would be associated with less frequent stressor exposure and severity and less intense negative affect following stressors; we conducted subsequent tests of neighborhood aesthetic quality as a predictor. METHODS: Participants (n = 233, age 25-65 years) were residents in a socio-economically, racially, and ethnically diverse zip code in Bronx, New York, most who participated in the Effects of Stress on Cognitive Aging, Physiology and Emotion study between 2012 and 2013. They provided demographic information and neighborhood ratings, then participated in the EMA protocol in which they completed brief smartphone surveys of current negative affect and stressor exposure, severity, and recency, five times daily for 14 days. RESULTS: No coded neighborhood characteristic was related to the frequency of stressors. Individuals who reported greater neighborhood violence, however, rated their stressors as more severe. Individuals rating their neighborhood lower in safety or aesthetic quality, or higher in violence, had greater negative affect following stressors. CONCLUSION: Even among people living within the same zip code, individual differences in perceptions of neighborhood predict how stressful they appraised stressors in daily life to be and how much negative affect they reported following stressors.
RATIONALE: Neighborhood characteristics may influence health and well-being outcomes through stressors in daily life. OBJECTIVES: This study tested whether a varied set of perceived characteristics of neighborhood (i.e., social cohesion, safety, aesthetic quality, violence) predicted stressor frequency and severity as well as negative emotional responses to stressors. We predicted greater reported cohesion and safety and less violence would be associated with less frequent stressor exposure and severity and less intense negative affect following stressors; we conducted subsequent tests of neighborhood aesthetic quality as a predictor. METHODS:Participants (n = 233, age 25-65 years) were residents in a socio-economically, racially, and ethnically diverse zip code in Bronx, New York, most who participated in the Effects of Stress on Cognitive Aging, Physiology and Emotion study between 2012 and 2013. They provided demographic information and neighborhood ratings, then participated in the EMA protocol in which they completed brief smartphone surveys of current negative affect and stressor exposure, severity, and recency, five times daily for 14 days. RESULTS: No coded neighborhood characteristic was related to the frequency of stressors. Individuals who reported greater neighborhood violence, however, rated their stressors as more severe. Individuals rating their neighborhood lower in safety or aesthetic quality, or higher in violence, had greater negative affect following stressors. CONCLUSION: Even among people living within the same zip code, individual differences in perceptions of neighborhood predict how stressful they appraised stressors in daily life to be and how much negative affect they reported following stressors.
Authors: Paulina Kaiser; Amy H Auchincloss; Kari Moore; Brisa N Sánchez; Veronica Berrocal; Norrina Allen; Ana V Diez Roux Journal: Health Place Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Sohrab Saeb; Mi Zhang; Christopher J Karr; Stephen M Schueller; Marya E Corden; Konrad P Kording; David C Mohr Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Stacey B Scott; Jennifer E Graham-Engeland; Christopher G Engeland; Joshua M Smyth; David M Almeida; Mindy J Katz; Richard B Lipton; Jacqueline A Mogle; Elizabeth Munoz; Nilam Ram; Martin J Sliwinski Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Kristine M Molina; Mayra L Estrella; Ramon Durazo-Arvizu; Vanessa L Malcarne; Maria M Llabre; Carmen R Isasi; India J Ornelas; Krista M Perreira; Frank J Penedo; Elizabeth Brondolo; Linda Gallo; Martha L Daviglus Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2018-12-27 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Elizabeth Muñoz; Stacey B Scott; Robin Corley; Sally J Wadsworth; Martin J Sliwinski; Chandra A Reynolds Journal: Health Place Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Robert S Stawski; Stacey B Scott; Matthew J Zawadzki; Martin J Sliwinski; David Marcusson-Clavertz; Jinhyuk Kim; Stephanie T Lanza; Paige A Green; David M Almeida; Joshua M Smyth Journal: Psychol Aging Date: 2018-12-13
Authors: Kristen N Arthur; Synnøve F Knutsen; Rhonda Spencer-Hwang; David Shavlik; Susanne Montgomery Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2019 Jan-Dec
Authors: Megan M Shannon; Jane E Clougherty; Clare McCarthy; Michal A Elovitz; Max Jordan Nguemeni Tiako; Steven J Melly; Heather H Burris Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Médicoulé Traoré; Cécile Vuillermoz; Pierre Chauvin; Séverine Deguen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 3.390