Literature DB >> 30550311

Age differences in everyday stressor-related negative affect: A coordinated analysis.

Robert S Stawski1, Stacey B Scott2, Matthew J Zawadzki3, Martin J Sliwinski4, David Marcusson-Clavertz5, Jinhyuk Kim6, Stephanie T Lanza5, Paige A Green7, David M Almeida4, Joshua M Smyth8.   

Abstract

Advancing age is often characterized by preserved or even enhanced emotion regulation, which is thought to manifest in terms of age-related reductions in the within-person association between stressors and negative affect. Existing research from ecological momentary assessment and end-of-day daily diary studies examining such age-related benefits have yielded mixed results, potentially due to differences in samples, design, and measurement of everyday stressors and negative affect. We conducted a coordinated analysis of 5 ecological momentary assessments and 2 end-of-day daily diary studies to examine adult age differences in the within-person association between everyday stressors and negative affect. Reported stressor occurrences are robustly associated with higher negative affect, regardless of study design and sample characteristics. Across studies, interactions between age and everyday stressors predicting negative affect revealed a pattern of age-related decreases in the stressor-negative affect association, but this interaction was only significant for 2 studies. Further, examination of statistical power of the included studies suggests that, despite differences in the number of repeated assessments, power to detect within-person stressor-negative affect associations is quite good. In contrast, despite possessing wider age ranges, observed age differences were relatively small in magnitude, and studies are potentially underpowered to detect age differences in these within-person associations. We discuss the importance of study design, interval of repeated assessments and number of participants for examining age differences in everyday stressors and negative affect, as well as the virtue of coordinated analyses for detecting consistent direction of associations, but inconsistent patterns of statistical significance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30550311      PMCID: PMC6367015          DOI: 10.1037/pag0000309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  50 in total

1.  Age-related differences in ambulatory blood pressure during daily stress: evidence for greater blood pressure reactivity with age.

Authors:  Bert N Uchino; Cynthia A Berg; Timothy W Smith; Gale Pearce; Michelle Skinner
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-06

2.  Intraindividual change and variability in daily stress processes: findings from two measurement-burst diary studies.

Authors:  Martin J Sliwinski; David M Almeida; Joshua Smyth; Robert S Stawski
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-12

3.  Effects of aging on experimentally instructed detached reappraisal, positive reappraisal, and emotional behavior suppression.

Authors:  Michelle N Shiota; Robert W Levenson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-12

Review 4.  Psychological vulnerability to daily stressors in old age: Results of short-term longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Oliver Karl Schilling; Manfred Diehl
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 1.281

5.  The daily inventory of stressful events: an interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors.

Authors:  David M Almeida; Elaine Wethington; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2002-03

6.  Has work replaced home as a haven? Re-examining Arlie Hochschild's Time Bind proposition with objective stress data.

Authors:  Sarah Damaske; Joshua M Smyth; Matthew J Zawadzki
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Fluid cognitive ability is associated with greater exposure and smaller reactions to daily stressors.

Authors:  Robert S Stawski; David M Almeida; Margie E Lachman; Patricia A Tun; Christopher B Rosnick
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-06

8.  Intensity and frequency: dimensions underlying positive and negative affect.

Authors:  E Diener; R J Larsen; S Levine; R A Emmons
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1985-05

9.  Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress.

Authors:  R C Kessler; G Andrews; L J Colpe; E Hiripi; D K Mroczek; S L T Normand; E E Walters; A M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Evaluating the longitudinal risk of social vigilance on atherosclerosis: study protocol for the North Texas Heart Study.

Authors:  John M Ruiz; Daniel J Taylor; Bert N Uchino; Timothy W Smith; Matthew Allison; Chul Ahn; Jillian J Johnson; Joshua M Smyth
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  15 in total

1.  How was your day? Convergence of aggregated momentary and retrospective end-of-day affect ratings across the adult life span.

Authors:  Andreas B Neubauer; Stacey B Scott; Martin J Sliwinski; Joshua M Smyth
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-05-09

2.  Diabetes stress and health: Is aging a strength or a vulnerability?

Authors:  Vicki S Helgeson; Meredith Van Vleet; Melissa Zajdel
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-11-15

3.  Associations among Braak stage, Parkinsonian gait, cognition, and functional status in autopsy-confirmed dementia with Lewy bodies.

Authors:  Ann M Mayo; Guerry M Peavy
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.485

Review 4.  Charting adult development through (historically changing) daily stress processes.

Authors:  David M Almeida; Susan T Charles; Jacqueline Mogle; Johanna Drewelies; Carolyn M Aldwin; Avron Spiro; Denis Gerstorf
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2020 May-Jun

5.  Race, socioeconomic status, and low-grade inflammatory biomarkers across the lifecourse: A pooled analysis of seven studies.

Authors:  Phoebe H Lam; Jessica J Chiang; Edith Chen; Gregory E Miller
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 4.905

6.  Resolution Status and Age as Moderators for Interpersonal Everyday Stress and Stressor-Related Affect.

Authors:  Dakota D Witzel; Robert S Stawski
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Individual Differences and Features of Self-reported Memory Lapses as Risk Factors for Alzheimer Disease Among Adults Aged 50 Years and Older: Protocol for a Coordinated Analysis Across Two Longitudinal Data Sets.

Authors:  Jacqueline Mogle; Nikki L Hill; Jennifer R Turner
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-05-14

8.  Incorporating ecological momentary assessment into multimethod investigations of cognitive aging: Promise and practical considerations.

Authors:  Jennifer L Crawford; Tammy English; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2022-02

9.  Coordinated data analysis: Knowledge accumulation in lifespan developmental psychology.

Authors:  Eileen K Graham; Emily C Willroth; Sara J Weston; Graciela Muniz-Terrera; Sean A P Clouston; Scott M Hofer; Daniel K Mroczek; Andrea M Piccinin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2021-05-24

10.  Cellular senescence as a driver of cognitive decline triggered by chronic unpredictable stress.

Authors:  Yu-Fen Lin; Li-Yun Wang; Chi-Sheng Chen; Chia-Chun Li; Ya-Hsin Hsiao
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2021-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.