| Literature DB >> 29190918 |
Lina Wang1,2, Xin Wang2,3, Ying Li2,4, Yan Hou5, Fengyu Sun5, Shuang Zhou2,4, Chunming Li1,2, Bin Zhang2,4.
Abstract
Biological requirements for tumor cell proliferation include the sustained increase of structural, energetic, signal transduction and biosynthetic precursors. Because lipids participate in membrane construction, energy storage, and cell signaling. We hypothesized that the differences in lipids between malignant carcinoma and normal controls could be reflected in the bio-fluids. A total of 100 pre-operative plasma samples were collected from 50 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), 50 normal patients and characterize by lipid profiling using ultra performance liquid chromatography/electro spray ionization mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS). The lipid profiles of the OSCC and control samples as well as the different stages were compared. Differentially expressed lipids were categorized as glycerophospholipids and sphingolipids. All glycerophospholipids were decreased, especially phosphatidylcholine and phosphoethanolamine plasmalogens, whereas sphingolipids were increased in the OSCC patients compared to the controls. We further identified 12 staging related lipids, which could be utilized to discriminate early stage patients from advanced stage patients. In the future, the differential lipids may provide biologists with additional information regarding lipid metabolism and guide clinicians in making individualized therapeutic decisions if these results are confirmed in a larger study.Entities:
Keywords: diagnosis; early diagnosis; lipidomics; oral squamous cell carcinoma; plasma
Year: 2017 PMID: 29190918 PMCID: PMC5696184 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Demographics and clinic pathological characteristics between OSCC and control groups
| Characteristics | OSCC | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 45±4.22 | 47±4.56 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 43(0.86) | 40(0.80) |
| Female | 7(0.14) | 10(0.20) |
| FIGO | ||
| I | 10(0.20) | |
| II | 18(0.36) | |
| III | 13(0.26) | |
| IV | 9(0.18) | |
| Lymphatic metastasis | ||
| Yes | 17(0.34) | |
| No | 33(0.66) | |
| Tumor location | ||
| Carcinoma of the tongue | 18(0.36) | |
| The floor of mouth | 16(0.32) | |
| The buccal mucosa | 5(0.10) | |
| The gingiva | 3(0.06) | |
| The lip | 8(0.16) |
Figure 1(A) PLS-DA score plot for discriminating OSCC and control with R2Y=0.443, Q2=0.221. (B) Validation plot for discriminating OSCC and control, all the permutation cumulative Q2 values were lower than the original values.
Twenty differential lipids between OSCC and control
| Name | mz | rt | FC | density | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC(32:2) | 730.5203 | 828.82 | 0.72 | down | <0.001 | 0.79 |
| PC(34:4) | 754.5129 | 813.36 | 0.56 | down | <0.001 | 0.79 |
| PC(36:4) | 782.5313 | 848.59 | 0.69 | down | <0.001 | 0.74 |
| PC(36:5) | 780.571 | 801.89 | 0.61 | down | <0.001 | 0.71 |
| PC(36:7) | 776.4328 | 812.12 | 0.51 | down | <0.001 | 0.77 |
| PC(38:6) | 806.6107 | 840.11 | 0.75 | down | <0.001 | 0.74 |
| PC(38:8) | 802.4852 | 798.25 | 0.57 | down | <0.001 | 0.77 |
| PC(38:9) | 800.5383 | 797.62 | 0.64 | down | <0.001 | 0.74 |
| PC(40:8) | 830.645 | 829.96 | 0.78 | down | <0.001 | 0.72 |
| PE(P-34:2) | 700.6135 | 936.65 | 0.76 | down | <0.001 | 0.73 |
| PE(P-36:2) | 728.504 | 991.14 | 0.81 | down | <0.001 | 0.7 |
| PE(P-36:4) | 724.5517 | 929.04 | 0.75 | down | <0.001 | 0.73 |
| PE(P-38:5) | 750.4511 | 934.49 | 0.81 | down | <0.001 | 0.66 |
| Cer(d18:1/16:0) | 538.5502 | 954.4 | 1.56 | up | <0.001 | 0.76 |
| Cer(d18:1/18:0) | 566.5151 | 1007.19 | 1.61 | up | <0.001 | 0.71 |
| GlcCeramide(d18:1/16:0) | 700.5802 | 886.65 | 1.61 | up | <0.001 | 0.77 |
| SM(d18:0/18:1) | 731.6491 | 925.12 | 1.47 | up | <0.001 | 0.79 |
| Trihexosylceramide (d18:1/16:0) | 1024.7369 | 830.21 | 1.45 | up | <0.001 | 0.85 |
| LysoPC(14:0) | 468.3542 | 111.67 | 0.63 | down | <0.001 | 0.77 |
| PG(34:2) | 747.5116 | 928.66 | 0.78 | down | <0.001 | 0.71 |
Measured mass to charge ratio (m/z); Retention time (s, RT); Fold change (FC).
Figure 2The intensity levels of lipids associated with pathological staging