Literature DB >> 29190087

Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.

Hossam M Ashtawy1, Nihar R Mahapatra1.   

Abstract

Molecular docking, scoring, and virtual screening play an increasingly important role in computer-aided drug discovery. Scoring functions (SFs) are typically employed to predict the binding conformation (docking task), binding affinity (scoring task), and binary activity level (screening task) of ligands against a critical protein target in a disease's pathway. In most molecular docking software packages available today, a generic binding affinity-based (BA-based) SF is invoked for all three tasks to solve three different, but related, prediction problems. The limited predictive accuracies of such SFs in these three tasks has been a major roadblock toward cost-effective drug discovery. Therefore, in this work, we develop BT-Score, an ensemble machine-learning (ML) SF of boosted decision trees and thousands of predictive descriptors to estimate BA. BT-Score reproduced BA of out-of-sample test complexes with correlation of 0.825. Even with this high accuracy in the scoring task, we demonstrate that the docking and screening performance of BT-Score and other BA-based SFs is far from ideal. This has motivated us to build two task-specific ML SFs for the docking and screening problems. We propose BT-Dock, a boosted-tree ensemble model trained on a large number of native and computer-generated ligand conformations and optimized to predict binding poses explicitly. This model has shown an average improvement of 25% over its BA-based counterparts in different ligand pose prediction scenarios. Similar improvement has also been obtained by our screening-based SF, BT-Screen, which directly models the ligand activity labeling task as a classification problem. BT-Screen is trained on thousands of active and inactive protein-ligand complexes to optimize it for finding real actives from databases of ligands not seen in its training set. In addition to the three task-specific SFs, we propose a novel multi-task deep neural network (MT-Net) that is trained on data from the three tasks to simultaneously predict binding poses, affinities, and activity levels. We show that the performance of MT-Net is superior to conventional SFs and on a par with or better than models based on single-task neural networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29190087     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  17 in total

1.  Nonparametric chemical descriptors for the calculation of ligand-biopolymer affinities with machine-learning scoring functions.

Authors:  Edelmiro Moman; Maria A Grishina; Vladimir A Potemkin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Incorporating Explicit Water Molecules and Ligand Conformation Stability in Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.

Authors:  Jianing Lu; Xuben Hou; Cheng Wang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Improving Structure-Based Virtual Screening with Ensemble Docking and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Joel Ricci-Lopez; Sergio A Aguila; Michael K Gilson; Carlos A Brizuela
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Using diverse potentials and scoring functions for the development of improved machine-learned models for protein-ligand affinity and docking pose prediction.

Authors:  Omar N A Demerdash
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction using Structure-Based Deep Learning: A Review.

Authors:  Rocco Meli; Garrett M Morris; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  Front Bioinform       Date:  2022-06-17

6.  Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks and a Cross-Docked Data Set for Structure-Based Drug Design.

Authors:  Paul G Francoeur; Tomohide Masuda; Jocelyn Sunseri; Andrew Jia; Richard B Iovanisci; Ian Snyder; David R Koes
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Property-Unmatched Decoys in Docking Benchmarks.

Authors:  Reed M Stein; Ying Yang; Trent E Balius; Matt J O'Meara; Jiankun Lyu; Jennifer Young; Khanh Tang; Brian K Shoichet; John J Irwin
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 8.  Empirical Scoring Functions for Structure-Based Virtual Screening: Applications, Critical Aspects, and Challenges.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Felipe S S Pereira; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning.

Authors:  Andrew T McNutt; Paul Francoeur; Rishal Aggarwal; Tomohide Masuda; Rocco Meli; Matthew Ragoza; Jocelyn Sunseri; David Ryan Koes
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 10.  Structure-Based Virtual Screening: From Classical to Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Eduardo Habib Bechelane Maia; Letícia Cristina Assis; Tiago Alves de Oliveira; Alisson Marques da Silva; Alex Gutterres Taranto
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.