Carlo J Milani1, Sean D Rundell1,2,3, Jeffrey G Jarvik2,4, Janna Friedly1,2, Patrick J Heagerty2,4,5,6, Andy Avins7, David Nerenz8, Laura S Gold2, Judith A Turner1,2,9, Thiru Annaswamy10,11, Srdjan S Nedeljkovic12,13, Pradeep Suri1,2,5. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 2. Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center (CECORC), University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 3. Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 5. Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center (ERIC) and Division of Rehabilitation Care Services, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA. 6. Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 7. Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, CA. 8. Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI. 9. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 10. VA North Texas Health Care System/Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 11. UTSouthwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 12. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Pain Management Center, Chestnut Hill, MA. 13. Spine Unit, Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Boston, MA.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the Back Pain Outcomes using Longitudinal Data (BOLD) cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To characterize associations of self-reported race/ethnicity with back pain (BP) patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and health care utilization among older adults with a new episode of care for BP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No prior longitudinal studies have characterized associations between multiple race/ethnicity groups, and BP-related PROs and health care utilization in the United States. METHODS: This study included 5117 participants ≥65 years from three US health care systems. The primary BP-related PROs were BP intensity and back-related functional limitations over 24 months. Health care utilization measures included common diagnostic tests and treatments related to BP (spine imaging, spine-related relative value units [RVUs], and total RVUs) over 24 months. Analyses were adjusted for multiple potential confounders including sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and study site. RESULTS: Baseline BP ratings were significantly higher for blacks vs. whites (5.8 vs. 5.0; P < 0.001). Participants in all race/ethnicity groups showed statistically significant, but modest improvements in BP over 24 months. Blacks and Hispanics did not have statistically significant improvement in BP-related functional limitations over time, unlike whites, Asians, and non-Hispanics; however, the magnitude of differences in improvement between groups was small. Blacks had less spine-related health care utilization over 24 months than whites (spine-related RVU ratio of means 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.86). Hispanics had less spine-related health care utilization than non-Hispanics (spine-related RVU ratio of means 0.60; 95% CI 0.40-0.90). CONCLUSION: Blacks and Hispanics had slightly less improvement in BP-related functional limitations over time, and less spine-related health care utilization, as compared to whites and non-Hispanics, respectively. Residual confounding may explain some of the association between race/ethnicity and health outcomes. Further studies are needed to understand the factors underlying these differences and which differences reflect disparities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the Back Pain Outcomes using Longitudinal Data (BOLD) cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To characterize associations of self-reported race/ethnicity with back pain (BP) patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and health care utilization among older adults with a new episode of care for BP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No prior longitudinal studies have characterized associations between multiple race/ethnicity groups, and BP-related PROs and health care utilization in the United States. METHODS: This study included 5117 participants ≥65 years from three US health care systems. The primary BP-related PROs were BP intensity and back-related functional limitations over 24 months. Health care utilization measures included common diagnostic tests and treatments related to BP (spine imaging, spine-related relative value units [RVUs], and total RVUs) over 24 months. Analyses were adjusted for multiple potential confounders including sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and study site. RESULTS: Baseline BP ratings were significantly higher for blacks vs. whites (5.8 vs. 5.0; P < 0.001). Participants in all race/ethnicity groups showed statistically significant, but modest improvements in BP over 24 months. Blacks and Hispanics did not have statistically significant improvement in BP-related functional limitations over time, unlike whites, Asians, and non-Hispanics; however, the magnitude of differences in improvement between groups was small. Blacks had less spine-related health care utilization over 24 months than whites (spine-related RVU ratio of means 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.86). Hispanics had less spine-related health care utilization than non-Hispanics (spine-related RVU ratio of means 0.60; 95% CI 0.40-0.90). CONCLUSION: Blacks and Hispanics had slightly less improvement in BP-related functional limitations over time, and less spine-related health care utilization, as compared to whites and non-Hispanics, respectively. Residual confounding may explain some of the association between race/ethnicity and health outcomes. Further studies are needed to understand the factors underlying these differences and which differences reflect disparities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Authors: Gareth T Jones; Ruth E Johnson; Nicola J Wiles; Carol Chaddock; Richard G Potter; Chris Roberts; Deborah P M Symmons; Gary J Macfarlane Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Timothy M Dall; Paul D Gallo; Ritasree Chakrabarti; Terry West; April P Semilla; Michael V Storm Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Timothy S Carey; Janet K Freburger; G Mark Holmes; Anne Jackman; Stefanie Knauer; Andrea Wallace; Jane Darter Journal: J Pain Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Damian Hoy; Lyn March; Peter Brooks; Fiona Blyth; Anthony Woolf; Christopher Bain; Gail Williams; Emma Smith; Theo Vos; Jan Barendregt; Chris Murray; Roy Burstein; Rachelle Buchbinder Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 19.103