OBJECTIVE: Pain is a subjectively complex and universal experience. We examine research investigating ethnic group differences in experimental pain response and factors contributing to group differences. METHOD: We conducted a systematic literature review and analysis of studies using experimental pain stimuli to assess pain sensitivity across multiple ethnic groups. Our search covered the period from 1944 to 2011, and used the PubMed bibliographic database; a reference source containing over 17 million citations. We calculated effect sizes; identified ethnic/racial group categories, pain stimuli, and measures; and examined findings regarding biopsychosociocultural factors contributing to ethnic/racial group differences. RESULTS: We found 472 studies investigating ethnic group differences and pain. Twenty-six of these met our review inclusion criteria of investigating ethnic group differences in experimental pain. The majority of studies included comparisons between African Americans (AA) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). There were consistently moderate to large effect sizes for pain tolerance across multiple stimulus modalities; AA demonstrated lower pain tolerance. For pain threshold, findings were generally in the same direction, but effect sizes were small to moderate across ethnic groups. Limited data were available for suprathreshold pain ratings. A subset of studies comparing NHW and other ethnic groups showed a variable range of effect sizes for pain threshold and tolerance. CONCLUSION: There are potentially important ethnic/racial group differences in experimental pain perception. Elucidating ethnic group differences has translational merit for culturally competent clinical care and for addressing and reducing pain treatment disparities among ethnically/racially diverse groups. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE:Pain is a subjectively complex and universal experience. We examine research investigating ethnic group differences in experimental pain response and factors contributing to group differences. METHOD: We conducted a systematic literature review and analysis of studies using experimental pain stimuli to assess pain sensitivity across multiple ethnic groups. Our search covered the period from 1944 to 2011, and used the PubMed bibliographic database; a reference source containing over 17 million citations. We calculated effect sizes; identified ethnic/racial group categories, pain stimuli, and measures; and examined findings regarding biopsychosociocultural factors contributing to ethnic/racial group differences. RESULTS: We found 472 studies investigating ethnic group differences and pain. Twenty-six of these met our review inclusion criteria of investigating ethnic group differences in experimental pain. The majority of studies included comparisons between African Americans (AA) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). There were consistently moderate to large effect sizes for pain tolerance across multiple stimulus modalities; AA demonstrated lower pain tolerance. For pain threshold, findings were generally in the same direction, but effect sizes were small to moderate across ethnic groups. Limited data were available for suprathreshold pain ratings. A subset of studies comparing NHW and other ethnic groups showed a variable range of effect sizes for pain threshold and tolerance. CONCLUSION: There are potentially important ethnic/racial group differences in experimental pain perception. Elucidating ethnic group differences has translational merit for culturally competent clinical care and for addressing and reducing pain treatment disparities among ethnically/racially diverse groups. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Claudia M Campbell; Christopher R France; Michael E Robinson; Henrietta L Logan; Gary R Geffken; Roger B Fillingim Journal: Pain Date: 2007-05-04 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Roger B Fillingim; Lee Kaplan; Roland Staud; Timothy J Ness; Toni L Glover; Claudia M Campbell; Jeffrey S Mogil; Margaret R Wallace Journal: J Pain Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: M Beth Mechlin; William Maixner; Kathleen C Light; Jessica M Fisher; Susan S Girdler Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: C Bond; K S LaForge; M Tian; D Melia; S Zhang; L Borg; J Gong; J Schluger; J A Strong; S M Leal; J A Tischfield; M J Kreek; L Yu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-08-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jacob M Vigil; Chance R Strenth; Andrea A Mueller; Jared DiDomenico; Diego Guevara Beltran; Patrick Coulombe; Jane Ellen Smith Journal: Hum Nat Date: 2015-06
Authors: A Yu; U Heilmeier; M Kretzschmar; G B Joseph; F Liu; H Liebl; C E McCulloch; M C Nevitt; N E Lane; T M Link Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Matthew C Morris; Lynn Walker; Stephen Bruehl; Natalie Hellman; Amanda L Sherman; Uma Rao Journal: J Pain Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: A M Cavanaugh; M J Rauh; C A Thompson; J Alcaraz; W M Mihalko; C E Bird; C B Eaton; M C Rosal; W Li; A H Shadyab; T Gilmer; A Z LaCroix Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Burel R Goodin; Quyen T Pham; Toni L Glover; Adriana Sotolongo; Christopher D King; Kimberly T Sibille; Matthew S Herbert; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Shelley H Sanden; Roland Staud; David T Redden; Laurence A Bradley; Roger B Fillingim Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Burel R Goodin; Hailey W Bulls; Matthew S Herbert; Jessica Schmidt; Christopher D King; Toni L Glover; Adriana Sotolongo; Kimberly T Sibille; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Roland Staud; Barri J Fessler; David T Redden; Laurence A Bradley; Roger B Fillingim Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 4.312