| Literature DB >> 29187241 |
Judith K Anchang-Kimbi1, Vera Ngenwie Nkweti2, Helen Ngum Ntonifor3, Tobias O Apinjoh4, Hanesh Fru Chi5, Rolland Bantar Tata5, Eric Akum Achidi4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Anaemia is a serious problem in pregnancy in malaria-endemic countries. This study investigated red cell morphologies and possible causes of anaemia among pregnant women at first clinic visit. Venous blood samples from consented women were used to determine haemoglobin (Hb) levels, mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) using an automated haematology analyzer. Malaria parasitaemia was diagnosed by microscopy. Definitions were as follows: anaemia (Hb < 11.0 g/dl), microcytosis (MCV < 78 fl), macrocytosis (MCV > 101 fl), hypochromasia (MCH < 27 pg), microcytic hypochromia or normocytic hypochromia with anaemia [iron deficiency anaemia (IDA)], normocytic normochromia with anaemia in the absence of malaria parasitaemia (physiological anaemia of pregnancy).Entities:
Keywords: Anaemia and pregnancy; Red blood cell indices
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29187241 PMCID: PMC5707787 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-2961-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Clinical characteristics of the study participants
| Variables | Categories | n | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age groups (279) | ≤ 20 | 80 | 28.7 |
| 21–25 | 95 | 34.1 | |
| 25 | 104 | 37.3 | |
| Gravidity groups (276) | Primigravidae | 74 | 26.8 |
| Secundigravidae | 94 | 34.1 | |
| Multigravidae | 108 | 39.1 | |
| Trimester of first ANC (277) | First | 9 | 3.2 |
| Second | 152 | 54.9 | |
| Third | 116 | 41.9 |
Comparison of mean levels of Hb MCH, MCHC, MCV, RBCs, Ht and RDW-CV among anaemic cases, malaria-related, non-malaria and non-anaemic cases
| Anaemic status/red blood cell indices | Hb (g/dl) | MCH (pg) | MCHC (g/dl) | MCV (fl) | RBC (× 1012/l) | Ht (%) | RDW-CV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $All anaemic cases | 9.6 ± 1.0 | 26.8 ± 3.4 | 31.8 ± 1.6 | 84.5 ± 8.9 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 29.9 ± 3.3 | 16.2 ± 2.5 |
| *Malaria-related anaemia (n = 37) | 9.5 ± 1.2 | 27.7 ± 3.6 | 32.0 ± 1.3 | 86.7 ± 10.3 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 29.5 ± 2.7 | 16.0 ± 1.8 |
| &Non-malaria anaemia (n = 122) | 9.6 ± 1.0 | 26.3 ± 3.2 | 31.7 ± 1.7 | 83.8 ± 8.4 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 30.1 ± 3.4 | 16.2 ± 2.7 |
| #Non-anaemic (n = 120) | 12.2 ± 0.9 | 29.2 ± 2.1 | 33.4 ± 1.3 | 87.7 ± 5.6 | 4.2 ± 0.4 | 36.4 ± 2.8 | 14.9 ± 1.9 |
Statistical significant difference between $ and #: Hb (t = 21.5; p < 0.001), MCH (t = 6.9; p < 0.001), MCHC (t = 9.1; p < 0.001), MCV (t = 3.5; p = p < 0.001) RBC (t = 10.7; p < 0.001), Hct (t = 17.4; p < 0.001), RDW-CV (t = 5.0; p < 0.001) levels
No statistical significant difference between * and &: Hb (t = 0.8; p = 0.42), MCH (t = 1.9; p = 0.07), MCHC (t = 1.0; p = 0.33), MCV (t = 1.7; p = 0.09), RBC (t =1.7; p = 0.09), Hct (t = 0.9; p = 0.36) and RDW-CV (t = 0.5; p = 0.65) levels
Statistical significant difference between * and #: Hb (t = 14.8; p < 0.001), MCH (t = 3.2; p = 0.002), MCHC (t = 5.7; p < 0.001), RBC (t = 8.5; p < 0.001), Hct (t = 13.1; p < 0.001), RDW-CV (t = 3.6; p < 0.001) except MCV (t = 0.7; p = 0.45) levels
Statistical significant difference between & and #: Hb (t = 20.2; p < 0.001), MCH (t = 7.5; p = 0.002), MCHC (t = 8.7; p < 0.001), MCV (t = 4.2; p = p < 0.001) RBC (t = 9.6; p < 0.001), Hct (t = 15.9; p < 0.001), RDW-CV (t = 4.7; p < 0.001) levels
Fig. 1Distribution of the different red blood cell morphologies among malaria-related, non-malaria and non anaemic women