| Literature DB >> 26835009 |
Ngimuh Leonard1, Fokam Bertrand Eric2, Anchang-Kimbi K Judith2, Wanji Samuel3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria in pregnancy has been shown to cause both maternal and infant morbidity and mortality especially in sub Saharan Africa. The World Health Organization therefore recommends the use of insecticide treated nets (ITNs), intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) and effective management of clinical malaria. The main aim of this study was to assess the coverage of ITN and IPT among pregnant women and the factors associated with their use in the Buea Health District of Cameroon.Entities:
Keywords: IPT and pregnancy; ITN; Usage
Year: 2016 PMID: 26835009 PMCID: PMC4734861 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-016-0116-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Public Health ISSN: 0778-7367
Socio demographic characteristics of pregnant women attending ANC in the Buea Health District
| Characteristics | Total enrolled | IPT users (%) | IPT Non users (%) | ITN users (%) | ITN Non users (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 292 | 259(88.7) | 33(11.3) | 128(43.8) | 51(17.5) | |
| Gravidity | Primigravid | 97 | 94(36.3) | 3(9.1) | 27(21.1) | 18(35.3) |
| Secondigravid | 92 | 76(29.3) | 16(48.5) | 44(34.4) | 14(27.5) | |
| Multigravid | 103 | 89(34.4) | 14(42.4) | 57(44.5) | 19(37.3) | |
| Age | <20 | 22 | 19(7.3) | 3(9.1) | 6(4.7) | 3(5.9) |
| 21–25 | 98 | 92(35.5) | 6(18.2) | 29(22.7) | 19(37.3) | |
| >25 | 172 | 148(57.1) | 24(72.4) | 93(72.6) | 29(56.9) | |
| Occupation | Students/unemployed | 92 | 88(34) | 4(12.1) | 19(14.8) | 26(51.0) |
| Business | 90 | 79(30.5) | 11(33.3) | 43(33.6) | 12(23.5) | |
| Civil servants | 58 | 50(19.3) | 8(24.2) | 34(26.6) | 7(13.7) | |
| House wife/ farmers | 52 | 42(16.2) | 10(30.3) | 32(25) | 6(11.8) | |
| Number of ANC Attendance | First | 27 | 5(1.9) | 22(66.7) | 24(18.8) | 1(2.0) |
| Second | 88 | 81(31.3) | 7(21.2) | 36(28.1) | 12(23.5) | |
| Third or more | 177 | 173(66.8) | 4(12.1) | 68(53.1) | 38(74.5) | |
| Education | Primary | 68 | 56(21.6) | 12(36.4) | 36(28.1) | 10(19.6) |
| Secondary/high | 126 | 108(41.7) | 18(54.5) | 62(48.4) | 19(37.3) | |
| Tertiary | 98 | 95(36.7) | 3(9.1) | 30(23.4) | 22(43.1) | |
| Trimester | Second | 150 | 120(46.3) | 30(90.9) | 73(57) | 19(37.3) |
| Third | 142 | 139(53.7) | 3(9.1) | 55(43) | 32(62.7) | |
Factors associated to ITN use in the Control of malaria in pregnancy using Bivariate and Multivariate analysis
| Factors | ITN use (%) | ITN Non users (%) | Significance | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI) |
| |||||
| Gravidity | Primigravid | 27(21.1) | 18(35.3) | χ2 = 3.92 | NA | |
| Secundigravid | 44(34.4) | 14(27.5) | P = 0.141 | NA | ||
| muitigravid | 57(44.5) | 19(37.3) | NA | |||
| Age | <20 | 6(4.7) | 3(5.9) | χ2 = 3.92 | NA | |
| 21–25 | 29(22.7) | 19(37.3) | P = 0.141 | NA | ||
| >25 | 93(72.6) | 29(56.9) | NA | |||
| Occupation | Students/unemployed | 19(14.8) | 26(51.0) | χ2 = 25.779 | 0.25(0.07–0.95) | 0.042 |
| Business | 43(33.6) | 12(23.5) | P = 0.001 | 0.65(0.18–2.35) | 0.511 | |
| Civil servants | 34(26.6) | 7(13.7) | 1.39(0.33–5.75) | 0.654 | ||
| House wife/ farmers | 32(25) | 6(11.8) | REF | |||
| Educational level | Primary | 56(21.6) | 10(19.6) | χ2 = 6.909 | 2.4(0.57–10.18) | 0.234 |
| Secondary/high | 108(41.7) | 19(37.3) | P = 0.032 | 2.11(0.77–5.77) | 0.147 | |
| Tertiary | 95(36.7) | 22(43.1) | REF | |||
| Trimester | Second | 73(57) | 19(37.3) | χ2 = 5.710 | 1.64(0.63–4.27) | 0.312 |
| Third | 55(43) | 32(62.7) | P = 0.017 | REF | ||
| Source of ITN | Hospital | 50(39.1) | 18(41.9) | χ2 = 11.912 | 7.45(0.67–83.22) | 0.103 |
| Free distribution | 77(60.2) | 20(46.5) | P = 0.003 | 8.06(0.75–87.04) | 0.09 | |
| Bought | 1(0.8) | 5(11.6) | REF | |||
| Number of ANC visits | One | 24(18.8) | 1(2.0) | χ2 = 10.464 | 4.23(0.46–39.19) | 0.204 |
| Twice | 36(28.1) | 12(23.5) | P = 0.005 | 1.46(0.53–4.01) | 0.461 | |
| Thrice or more | 68(53.1) | 38(74.5) | REF | |||
NA means not applicable and REF means reference group use for comparison
Factors associated to IPTp use for malaria control in pregnancy using bivariate and multivariate analysis
| Factors | IPT use (%) | IPT Non users (%) | Significant | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI) | p-value | |||||
| Gravidity | Primigravid | 94(36.3) | 3(9.1) | χ2 = 10.463 | 5.04(0.69-37.10) | 0.112 |
| Secundigravid | 76(29.3) | 16(48.5) | P = 0.005 | 0.41(0.11-1.56) | 0.190 | |
| Multigravid | 89(34.4) | 14(42.4) | REF | |||
| Age | <20 | 19(7.3) | 3(9.1) | χ2 = 3.949 | NA | |
| 21-25 | 92(35.5) | 6(18.2) | P = 0.139 | NA | ||
| >25 | 148(57.1) | 24(72.4) | NA | |||
| Occupation | Students/unemployed | 88(34) | 4(12.1) | χ2 = 8.135 | 1.64(0.28-9.67) | 0.586 |
| Business | 79(30.5) | 11(33.3) | P = 0.043 | 4.31(0.85-21.86) | 0.079 | |
| Civil servants | 50(19.3) | 8(24.2) | 0.51(0.07-3.92) | 0.520 | ||
| House wife/farmers | 42(16.2) | 10(30.3) | REF | |||
| Educational level | Primary | 49(19.4) | 12(36.4) | χ2 = 11.749 | 0.23(0.02-2.14) | 0.195 |
| Secondary/high | 108(42.9) | 18(54.5) | P = 0.003 | 0.26(0.05-1.46) | 0.126 | |
| Tertiary | 95(37.7) | 3(9.1) | REF | |||
| Trimester of pregnancy | Second | 120(46.3) | 30(90.9) | χ2 = 23.283 | 0.25(0.06-1.13) | 0.071 |
| Third | 139(53.7) | 3(9.1) | P = 0.000 | REF | ||
| Number of ANC visits | One | 5(1.9) | 22(66.7) | Χ2 = 148.08 | 0.006(0.00-0.04) | 0.001 |
| Twice | 81(31.3) | 7(21.2) | P = 0.000 | 0.39(0.10-1.56) | 0.181 | |
| Thrice or more | 173(66.8) | 4(12.1) | REF | |||
Where NA means not applicable and REF means reference group use for comparison