| Literature DB >> 29186903 |
Marta Gómez1,2, Laura Moles3, Irene Espinosa-Martos4, Gerardo Bustos5, Willem M de Vos6,7, Leónides Fernández8,9, Juan M Rodríguez10,11, Susana Fuentes12, Esther Jiménez13,14.
Abstract
An abnormal colonization pattern of the preterm gut may affect immune maturation and exert a long-term influence on the intestinal bacterial composition and host health. However, follow-up studies assessing the evolution of the fecal microbiota of infants that were born preterm are very scarce. In this work, the bacterial compositions of fecal samples, obtained from sixteen 2-year-old infants were evaluated using a phylogenetic microarray; subsequently, the results were compared with those obtained in a previous study from samples of meconium and feces collected from the same infants while they stayed in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). In parallel, the concentration of a wide range of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and immunoglobulins were determined in meconium and fecal samples. Globally, a higher bacterial diversity and a lower interindividual variability were observed in 2-year-olds' feces, when compared to the samples obtained during their first days of life. Hospital-associated fecal bacteria, that were dominant during the NICU stay, seemed to be replaced, two years later, by genera, which are usually predominant in the healthy adult microbiome. The immune profile of the meconium and fecal samples differed, depending on the sampling time, showing different immune maturation statuses of the gut.Entities:
Keywords: DNA microarray; immune maturation; infant gut microbiota; prematurity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29186903 PMCID: PMC5748744 DOI: 10.3390/nu9121293
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Demographic data for the infant cohort.
| Infant | Gestational Age (week) | Delivery Mode | Gender | Birth Weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 30 | Caesarean section | Male | 1550 |
| 4 | 27 | Caesarean section | Female | 1080 |
| 5 | 30 | Caesarean section | Male | 2030 |
| 6 | 30 | Vaginal | Male | 1760 |
| 7 | 24 | Caesarean section | Female | 600 |
| 9 | 27 | Vaginal | Male | 1540 |
| 10 | 26 | Caesarean section | Female | 790 |
| 13 | 32 | Vaginal | Female | 1310 |
| 15 | 30 | Vaginal | Female | 1350 |
| 18 | 24 | Vaginal | Male | 740 |
| 21 | 28 | Caesarean section | Male | 1100 |
| 22 | 31 | Vaginal | Female | 1430 |
| 28 | 27 | Vaginal | Female | 1040 |
| 29 | 29 | Caesarean section | Male | 680 |
| 30 | 30 | Vaginal | Female | 1370 |
| 31 | 28 | Caesarean section | Female | 1150 |
Clinical characteristics of the preterm infants recruited in this study.
| Infant | Hospital Stay (days) | Antibiotic Therapy (days) | Mechanical Ventilation (days) | Parenteral Nutrition (days) | Nasogastric Feeding Tube (days) | Meconium Expulsion (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 42 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 38 | 59 |
| 4 | 60 | 4 | 0.5 | 3 | 48 | 24 |
| 5 | 27 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 26 | 11 |
| 6 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 7 |
| 7 | 113 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 107 | 116 |
| 9 | 68 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 58 | 96 |
| 10 | 84 | 7 | 0.5 | 6 | 70 | 0 |
| 13 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 12 |
| 15 | 44 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 38 | 11 |
| 18 | 116 | 27 | 35 | 13 | 112 | 144 |
| 21 | 73 | 7 | 10 | 14 | 62 | 48 |
| 22 | 37 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 35 | 3 |
| 28 | 68 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 62 | 12 |
| 29 | 70 | 15 | 8 | 9 | 60 | 144 |
| 30 | 41 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 40 | |
| 31 | 52 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 47 | 9 |
| Mean (95% CI) | 58.64 (41.35; 75.93) | 4.85 (2.66; 7.05) | 52.40 (36.03; 68.82) | 46.4 (17.22;75.58) | ||
| Median (IQR) | 3.5 (3.0–7.0) | 0.25 (0.00–1.75) |
CI: Confidence interval; IQR: Inter-quartile range.
Figure 1Hierarchical clustering of the intestinal microbiota. Unsupervised clustering was performed for HITChip oligoprofiles, obtained from fecal samples of the preterm infants at meconium (0 days), third week (21 days) and 2-years (720 days). Each line represents a different probe and the darkness of the lines represents the probe abundance in the sample. The highest phylogenetic levels represented are shown on the right side of the figure. Pearson’s correlation and Ward’s clustering methods were used.
Figure 2Development of the intestinal microbiota composition at the phylum level. The relative contribution is shown for the phyla detected in meconium, third week and 2-year fecal samples of the preterm infants.
Figure 3Development of the intestinal microbiota composition at the phylum/order level. The relative contribution is shown for the phylum/order-like phylogroups of the microbiota of meconium, third week and 2-year fecal samples of the preterm, as assessed using the HITChip microarray. Only phylum/order-like phylogroups that contributed at least 0.1% to a given profile are shown.
Relative counts of genus-like bacterial groups. The genus-like phylogenetic groups (Level 2; [39]), detected in fecal samples, collected at 21 days and 2 years after birth, from preterm infants, are shown a.
| Phylum/Order | Genus-Like Phylogenetic Group ¥ | 21 Days | 730 Days | Fold Change # | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.04 (0.03; 0.04) | 0.25 (0.18; 0.32) | 0.009 | ↑6.77 | ||
| 0.09 (0.08; 0.11) | 0.38 (0.17; 0.59) | 0.009 | ↑4.06 | ||
| 0.06 (0.05; 0.07) | 0.38 (0.05; 0.71) | 0.009 | ↑6.69 | ||
| 0.04 (0.03; 0.04) | 0.12 (0.08; 0.16) | 0.009 | ↑3.23 | ||
| 0.09(0.08; 0.11) | 0.26 (0.11; 0.41) | 0.016 | ↑2.73 | ||
| 0.04 (0.03; 0.04) | 0.11 (0.05; 0.16) | 0.009 | ↑2.97 | ||
| 0.08 (0.05; 0.09) | 3.12 (1.54; 4.70) | 0.009 | ↑39.50 | ||
| 0.06 (0.05; 0.07) | 0.32 (0.16; 0.48) | 0.009 | ↑5.20 | ||
| 0.11 (0.09; 0.13) | 0.88 (−0.16; 1.92) | 0.033 | ↑8.20 | ||
| 0.04 (0.03; 0.04) | 0.24 (−0.02; 0.50) | 0.016 | ↑6.55 | ||
| 0.02 (0.02; 0.03) | 0.10 (0.07; 0.13) | 0.009 | ↑4.20 | ||
| 0.05 (0.04; 0.06) | 0.13 (0.11; 0.16) | 0.009 | ↑2.63 | ||
| 3.49 (−1.05; 8.03) | 0.10 (0.06; 0.13) | 0.009 | ↓36.18 | ||
| 1.00 (0.19; 1.80) | 0.02 (0.01; 0.02) | 0.009 | ↓61.31 | ||
| 0.02 (0.01; 0.02) | 0.73 (−0.02; 1.48) | 0.056 | ↑41.05 | ||
| 0.19 (−0.05; 0.43) | 0.02 (nd) | 0.033 | ↓10.86 | ||
| 0.04 (0.02; 0.05) | 0.15 (0.11; 0.20) | 0.033 | ↑3.96 | ||
| 0.03 (0.03; 0.04) | 0.28 (0.15; 0.41) | 0.009 | ↑9.26 | ||
| 0.13 (0.11; 16) | 3.49 (1.20; 5.79) | 0.009 | ↑26.48 | ||
| 0.18 (0.09; 0.28) | 2.16 (0.74; 3.57) | 0.009 | ↑11.81 | ||
| 1.03 (−0.68; 2.73) | 5.59 (3.90; 7.29) | 0.042 | ↑5.44 | ||
| 0.17 (0.14; 0.20) | 5.02 (1.81; 8.22) | 0.009 | ↑29.35 | ||
| 0.15 (0.13; 0.18) | 3.10 (−0.13; 6.32) | 0.009 | ↑20.04 | ||
| 0.06 (0.05; 0.07) | 0.50 (0.34; 0.66) | 0.009 | ↑8.56 | ||
| 0.02 (0.02; 0.03) | 1.31 (0.20; 2.43) | 0.009 | ↑52.65 | ||
| 0.08 (0.07; 0.09) | 0.86 (−0.06; 1.78) | 0.009 | ↑10.57 | ||
| 0.16 (0.14; 0.19) | 1.89 (0.96; 2.81) | 0.009 | ↑11.56 | ||
| 0.11 (0.09; 0.13) | 2.98 (1.48; 4.48) | 0.009 | ↑27.51 | ||
| 0.05 (0.02; 0.07) | 0.75 (−0.03; 1.54) | 0.009 | ↑16.10 | ||
| 0.05 (0.04; 0.06) | 0.41 (0.27; 0.55) | 0.009 | ↑7.79 | ||
| 0.09 (0.05; 0.12) | 3.94 (2.10; 5.77) | 0.009 | ↑45.14 | ||
| 0.14 (0.08; 0.21) | 0.69 (0.50; 0.89) | 0.009 | ↑4.82 | ||
| 0.16 (0.09; 0.23) | 1.41 (1.14; 1.68) | 0.009 | ↑8.89 | ||
| 0.05 (0.04; 0.06) | 0.14 (0.06; 0.23) | 0.009 | ↑2.77 | ||
| 0.12 (0.09; 0.14) | 0.85 (0.56; 1.14) | 0.009 | ↑7.38 | ||
| 0.22 (0.13; 0.32) | 1.81 (1.38; 2.24) | 0.009 | ↑8.09 | ||
| 0.08 (0.06; 0.09) | 4.96 (2.87; 7.04) | 0.009 | ↑64.93 | ||
| 0.16 (0.08; 0.23) | 2.63 (1.86; 3.40) | 0.009 | ↑16.72 | ||
| 0.04 (0.02; 0.06) | 2.23 (1.40; 3.05) | 0.009 | ↑52.41 | ||
| 0.06 (0.04; 0.08) | 0.42 (0.26; 0.58) | 0.009 | ↑7.09 | ||
| 0.05 (0.02; 0.07) | 0.28 (0.13; 0.42) | 0.009 | ↑6.00 | ||
| 0.07 (0.05; 0.07) | 0.31 (0.26; 0.36) | 0.009 | ↑4.43 | ||
| 0.10 (0.07; 0.13) | 0.40 (0.28; 0.53) | 0.009 | ↑4.08 | ||
| 0.03 (0.01; 0.05) | 0.24 (0.15; 0.34) | 0.009 | ↑7.86 | ||
| 0.03 (0.02; 0.03) | 0.42 (−0.18; 1.02) | 0.009 | ↑16.30 | ||
| 0.26 (0.21; 0.31) | 11.42 (8.18; 14.66) | 0.009 | ↑43.96 | ||
| Uncultured | Uncultured | 0.17 (0.14; 0.20) | 1.11 (0.12; 2.10) | 0.009 | ↑6.48 |
| Uncultured | 0.18 (0.16; 0.21) | 0.36 (0.21; 0.51) | 0.009 | ↑1.97 | |
| Uncultured | Uncultured | 0.08 (0.07; 0.10) | 0.32 (−0.07; 0.70) | 0.022 | ↑3.94 |
| 0.01 (nd) | 0.10 (−0.04; 0.24) | 0.016 | ↑10.98 | ||
| 14.82 (8.07; 21.57) | 0.21 (0.10; 0.32) | 0.009 | ↓69.90 | ||
| 37.06 (24.37; 49.76) | 0.82 (−0.25; 1.88) | 0.009 | ↓45.41 | ||
| 15.75 (10.18; 21.32) | 0.11 (0.05; 0.18) | 0.009 | ↓138.34 | ||
| 0.02 (0.02; 0.03) | 0.17 (0.02; 0.32) | 0.009 | ↑7.35 | ||
| 0.29 (0.17; 0.42) | 0.09 (0.05; 0.12) | 0.009 | ↓3.46 | ||
| 5.18 (1.88; 8.49) | 0.15 (−0.04; 0.33) | 0.009 | ↓35.00 | ||
| 0.08 (0.07; 0.10) | 0.23 (0.07; 0.39) | 0.009 | ↑2.79 | ||
| 0.11 (0.08; 0.15) | 0.04 (0.03; 0.04) | 0.009 | ↓2.94 | ||
| 1.16 (0.63; 1.68) | 0.04 (0.03; 0.04) | 0.009 | ↓31.05 | ||
| 0.06 (0.00; 0.13) | 0.62 (0.34; 0.91) | 0.016 | ↑9.64 |
a Relative counts (log-transformed hybridization signals) are expressed as the mean and 95% confidence interval. nd, no data. ¥ The genus-like phylogenetic groups shown, contributed at least 0.1% to the microbial profile of a given sample. * t-tests were used to evaluate differences in the hybridization signal intensities of genus-like bacterial groups across time. # Fold changes were calculated as log-transformed hybridization signals at 2 years over those at 3 weeks.
Figure 4Development of the intestinal microbiota diversity. Shannon–Weaver diversity indices are shown for the intestinal microbiota in the meconium, third week and 2-year fecal samples of preterm infants. Boxes at the right and middle represent the Shannon–Weaver diversity index obtained in meconium, 21-day and 2-year feces. Boxes on the right represent Shannon–Weaver diversity indexes previously obtained with the Human Intestinal Tract Chip (HITChip) in feces, from 2 and 4-year-old healthy infants and from healthy adults. The red bars on the top represent pairs of indices that were found to be statistically different (p < 0.001).
Figure 5Correlation analysis for the intestinal microbiota. The results of a redundancy analysis are shown for the bacterial composition of meconium (blue circles), third week (red squares) and 2-year (green rhombus) fecal samples of the preterm infants. Arabic numbers indicate the different infants. Gray arrows indicate the bacterial groups associated with the different samples. The plotted first and second ordination axes explained 41.4% of the variability in the data set. Age was the only variable that was significantly related to the sample distribution (p = 0.006, Monte Carlo Permutation Testing (MCPT) with forward selection).
Immunological analysis of intestinal samples. The presence and concentrations are shown for cytokines and other immune compounds in the meconium and fecal samples collected in this study.
| Meconium | Feces (7 days) | Feces (21 days) | Feces (2 years) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | |||||||
| Innate immunity | ||||||||||
| IL-1β | 2 (22.22) | 1.24 (0.68–1.80) | 7 (77.78) | 0.13 (0.05–0.30) | 13 (86.67) | 0.05 (0.03–0.38) | 0 | - | 0.000 | 0.520 |
| IL-6 | 1 (11.11) | 0.03 | 2 (22.22) | 0.02 (0.02–0.03) | 3 (20.00) | 0.05 (0.05–0.71) | 4 (26.67) | 0.3 (0.15–0.47) | 0.094 | 0.255 |
| IL-12p70 | 1 (11.11) | 0.06 | 2 (22.22) | 0.11 (0.08–0.15) | 4 (26.67) | 0.07 (0.05–0.12) | 4 (26.67) | 0.84 (0.28–1.38) | 0.018 | 0.601 |
| IFN-γ * | 0 | - | 0 | - | 1 (6.67) | 3.27 | 3 (20.00) | 9.27 (−7.44; 25.98) | 0.000 | 0.521 |
| TNF-α | 1 (11.11) | 0.14 | 2 (22.22) | 0.15 (0.13–0.17) | 5 (33.33) | 0.18 (0.10–0.25) | 3 (20.00) | 0.27 (0.17–0.43) | 0.002 | 0.934 |
| Acquired immunity | ||||||||||
| IL-2 | 1 (11.11) | 0.92 | 1 (11.11) | 0.09 | 2 (13.33) | 0.04 (0.03–0.05) | 4 (26.67) | 0.04 (0.02–0.15) | 0.003 | 0.373 |
| IL-4 | 4 (44.44) | 0.01 (0.00–0.01) | 6 (66.67) | 0.01 (0.00–0.01) | 11 (73.33) | 0.01 (0.00–0.01) | 15 (100.00) | 0.01 (0.00–0.01) | 0.000 | 0.292 |
| IL-10 | 0 | - | 1 (11.11) | 0.03 | 1 (6.67) | 0.04 | 4 (26.67) | 0.03 (0.02–0.23) | 0.000 | 0.675 |
| IL-13 * | 1 (11.11) | 0.03 | 1 (11.11) | 0.05 | 2 (13.33) | 0.08 (−0.10; 0.26) | 1 (6.67) | 0.05 | 0.568 | 0.571 |
| IL-17 | 4 (44.44) | 3.09 (2.32–3.31) | 2 (22.22) | 0.08 (0.05–0.12) | 9 (60.00) | 0.07 (0.03–0.19) | 12 (80.00) | 0.08 (0.04–0.06) | 0.000 | 0.122 |
| Chemokines | ||||||||||
| IL-8 * | 4 (44.44) | 0.07 (−0.08; 0.21) | 1 (11.11) | 0.05 | 3 (20.00) | 0.09 (−0.02; 0.20) | 0 | - | 0.000 | 0.865 |
| MCP-1 | 3 (33.33) | 0.03 (0.02–0.03) | 1 (11.11) | 0.03 | 4 (26.67) | 0.05 (0.03–0.06) | 9 (60.00) | 0.19 (0.06–0.88) | 0.000 | 0.080 |
| MIP-1β | 6 (66.67) | 0.62 (0.05–1.78) | 6 (66.67) | 0.05 (0.04–0.16) | 8 (53.33) | 0.07 (0.02–0.10) | 2 (13.33) | 0.05 (0.04–0.07) | 0.000 | 0.639 |
| GRO-α | 3 (33.33) | 0.18 (0.16–8.28) | 0 (0.00) | - | 6 (40.00) | 0.16 (0.11–0.19) | 3 (20.00) | 0.14 (0.13–0.22) | 0.000 | 0.537 |
| Hematopoyetic factors | ||||||||||
| IL-5 * | 0 | - | 0 | - | 1 (6.67) | 0.03 | 5 (33.33) | 0.25(0.03; 0.47) | 0.000 | 0.322 |
| IL-7 | 1 (11.11) | 0.03 | 1 (11.11) | 0.04 | 3 (20.00) | 0.03 (0.02–0.05) | 0 | - | 0.000 | 0.766 |
| G-CSF | 4 (44.44) | 1.64 (0.34–4.29) | 6 (66.67) | 0.06 (0.04–0.17) | 12 (80.00) | 0.28 (0.15–0.55) | 12 (80.00) | 0.14 (0.11–0.46) | 0.000 | 0.220 |
| GM-CSF | 9 (100.00) | 0.59 a (0.28–55.03) | 7 (77.78) | 0.23 ab (0.12–0.40) | 15 (100.00) | 0.23 ab (0.18–0.26) | 15 (100.00) | 0.67 ac (0.62–0.87) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Concentrations (ng/g feces) are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR). 1 n (%): number of samples in which the parameter was detected (relative frequency of detection). ♯ Chi-squared tests were used to evaluate differences in expression frequencies of the analyzed parameters. One-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to evaluate differences in concentration across time. Different superscript letters show which medians were different within groups. * These data sets were normally distributed and concentrations are expressed as mean and 95% CI.
Detection and concentrations of immunoglobulins (Ig) in the meconium and fecal samples collected in this study.
| Meconium | Feces (7 days) | Feces (21 days) | Feces (2 years) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | |||||||
| IgG1 | 4 (44.44) | 0.03 (0.02–0.06) | 2 (22.22) | 0.34 (0.18–0.50) | 3 (20.00) | 0.32 (0.17–0.76) | 1 (6.67) | 0.06 | 0.000 | 0.621 |
| IgG2 | 6 (66.67) | 1.54 (0.84–3.39) | 7 (77.78) | 0.99 (0.84–1.19) | 3 (20.00) | 0.35 (0.27–0.62) | 2 (13.33) | 0.34 (0.24–0.44) | 0.000 | 0.062 |
| IgG3 * | 0 | - | 1 (11.11) | 0.01 | 0 | - | 2 (13.33) | 0.01 (−0.01; 0.03) | 0.000 | 0.326 |
| IgG4 * | 2 (22.22) | 0.00 (−0.01; 0.01) | 3 (33.33) | 0.01 (−0.00; 0.02) | 1 (6.67) | 0.00 | 1 (6.67) | 0.01 | 0.000 | 0.510 |
| IgM | 1 (2.08) | 0.55 | 6 (12.50) | 2.27 (0.53–5.14) | 11 (22.92) | 0.54 (0.33–0.88) | 1 (6.67) | 0.08 | 0.000 | 0.368 |
| IgA | 5 (55.56) | 1.02 a (0.48–67.45) | 8 (88.89) | 26.62 ab (10.42–58.88) | 15 (100.00) | 6.24 ab (3.69–26.13) | 13 (86.67) | 1.13 ac (0.81–3.18) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
Concentrations (mg/g feces) arere expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR). 1 n (%): number of samples in which the parameter was detected (relative frequency of detection). ♯ Chi-squared tests were used to evaluate differences in expression frequencies of the analyzed parameters. One-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to evaluate differences in concentration across time. Different superscript letters show which medians were different within groups. * These data sets were normally distributed and concentrations are expressed as mean and 95% CI.
Figure 6Multiple discriminant analysis (MDA) of the immune data. MDA was applied to the immunological data of meconium (blue circles), first week (red squares), third week (orange cross), and 2-year (green rhombus) feces, taking sampling time as the discriminant factor. The red cross represents the mathematical centroid for each sampling time group (meconium, first week, third week, and 2-year fecal samples). The first and second functions, which were plotted as the x and y axes, had a predictive power of 85% and internal axes (pink lines) match the zero values for both functions.